Syllabus for Educational TechnologyFull description
Educational Technology for LETFull description
Reaction paper on abortionabReaction paper on abortionabReaction paper on abortionabReaction paper on abortionabReaction paper on abortionabReaction paper on abortionabReaction paper on abor…Full description
Reaction Paper 14Full description
Stock Smart: Stock Investing Made Easy by Marvin Germo
This is about a show that was aired last 2005 about the imaging of the Philippine Presidents :)Full description
Pangungulisap Reaction PaperFull description
Reaction Paper 8Full description
Technological Institute of the Philippines – Quezon City ED 009 – Educational Technology 2 “A 2page !eaction pape"# $a%e& Joven, Christine Diane M.
P"ofesso"& Dr. Maria Christina Aragon
P"og"a% ' (ection& ED_ENGL / ED31FA1 What is this research article all ao!t" Wh# $o %e nee$ to rea$ this" What ene&its %o!l$ ' gain in rea$ing this" What is the relevance o& this research article to (# co!rse" )o% $oes it relate to (e as an e$!cation st!$ent" *hese %ere &e% o& the +!estions that oe$ into (# hea$ %hen ' &irst rea$ the title, -Understanding Today’s Learners.” asicall#, even e&ore rea$ing its content, ' $e$!ce$ that it %as %as all all going going to e ao!t ao!t no%in no%ing g an$ an$ !n$e !n$erst rstan an$in $ing g the the learne learners rs o& to$a# to$a# or, or, (ore (ore seci&icall#, seci&icall#, to$a#0s generation. *heir characteristics, characteristics, learning l earning st#les, $i&&erences, $i&&erences, %oring (in$ sets etc. An#%a#s, a&ter rea$ing the %hole content content o& the research article, ' &o!n$ o!t that it tells !s ao!t the generation o& to$a# or the so calle$ “Web 2.0 Learners or 2.0 Learners” Learners” %ho the# are, %hat sets the( aart &ro( the other generation, ho% the# learn an$ sho!l$ learn, ho% the# interact an$ learn %ith an$ &ro( others an$ ho% $o staehol$ers an$ eole in the %or&orce coe ! %ith it an$ set $i&&erent strategies an$ aroaches that caters to these generation. Jane )art, the a!thor o& the research article, $ivi$e$ it into three arts2 art 14 *he 5esea 5esearch rch,, art art 64 *he *he racti ractice ce an$ an$ art art 34 Learn Learnin ing g an$ an$ $evel $evelo o(e (ent nt ro&es ro&essio siona nals ls as Learners 6.7. No%, let (e get into $etails &or each arts an$ share to #o! %hat &acts an$ insights ' have learne$ an$ $e$!ce$ &ro( the research article. PA!T )& 'n s!((ar#, this art tells !s all ao!t the characteristics o& to$a#0s learners an$ ho% the# est learn in t%o (ain %a#s2 819 Age an$ generational generational attit!$inal $i&&erences2 $i&&erences2 an$ 869 # their !se o& technolog#, artic!larl#, We 6.7 social (e$ia tools. 'n act!alit#, it %as interesting to no% these ne% in&or(ation eca!se ' have &o!n$ o!t that ' elong in the “Generation Z,” %hich in$icates ho% reall# #o!ng ' a(. An#%a#s, it %as not the &oc!s o& the research article &or it %as the “Generation Y” that %as given (ore e(hasis. Moreover, ' have learne$ that it $oesn0t necessaril# (ean that i& #o! are a “digital native,” #
all (eans, #o! are technolog# o(niscient, an$ (ore so, i& #o! are a “digital immigrant” #o! are not tech:savv# or an e;ert in !sing technolog# an#(ore. 'n &act, ' a( a sel&:$eclare$ “digital namigrant < 8a ter( ' (a$e ! # (i;ing oth ter(s9 &or ' live in the ti(e erio$ that technolog# alrea$# e;ists an$ is a tren$ #et not reall# %ell:verse$ in its co(le;ities. PA!T 2& 'n this art, it reorts on intervie%s %ith eLearning G!il$ (e(ers &ro( oth e$!cation an$ %orlace learning, on ho% the# erceive learners o& to$a#, an$ ho% the# are a$$ressing their nee$s. 'n&or(ative #et co(licate$. *%o %or$s ' have sai$ a&ter ' &inishe$ rea$ing this art. 't %as in&or(ative &or it gave ne% &acts that can e o& hel to (e, as an in$ivi$!al, a learner an$ a &!t!re e$!cator. 't (a$e (e reali=e$ that %ith the $a%n o& We 6.7 social (e$ia tools, it ave$ %a# &or (an# oort!nities, so!rces an$ lins &or to$a#0s learners. 't (a$e the( (ore in$een$ent an$ (ani!lative in $oing (!lti:tasing sills, %hether it e in an in$ivi$!ali=e$ instr!ction or collaorative learning e;erience. An$ ' can reall# relate to that. >n the contrar#, it %as co(licate$, in a sense that, it (a$e (ore $i&&ic!lties &or the “traditional learners” to ee ! %ith the( 86.7 learners9 an$ to accet the !se o& technolog# in their $ail# lives eseciall# in a %orlace setting. )ence, it %as reall# hel&!l to learn so(e tis &ro( e;erts intervie%e$ &or the research article on ho% to get the( 8tra$itional learners9 e involve$. PA!T *& *he last art loos at the i(ortance &or learning an$ $evelo(ent ro&essionals to e;erience eing a “Learner 2.0” in or$er to a$vise on aroriate ne% learning aroaches. *his art %as reall# enlightening. asicall#, the est i$ea ' have learne$ %as “E!erien"e is t#e best tea"#er.” ' elieve nothing can $e&eat nor s!rasse$ that. 't %as even (entione$ in the art 6 o& the research article that generation o& to$a# are (ostl# “e!eriential learners.” )ence, learning an$ $evelo(ent ro&essionals, ractitioners, staehol$ers an$ even teachers sho!l$ also $o the sa(e thing. 5esearch an$ e;erience &irst:han$ %hat their learners e;erience in !sing the technolog# or, (ore seci&icall#, the “Web 2.0 so"ial media tools,” an$ !se it $ail#, %hether it e &or ersonal or ro&essional !roses. Lie %hat ' have recentl# learne$ in (# Fiel$ ?t!$# co!rses, one o& the things ' (!st $o as an asiring &!t!re e$!cator, accor$ing to the “$ational %om!eten"y&'ased Tea"#er
(tandards )$%'T(*,” %as to ee (#sel& areast %ith the latest $evelo(ents, tren$s, reathro!ghs an$ technologies in e$!cation. What ' gaine$ &ro( the research article is o& %orth%hile an$ o& !se to an# &!t!re !n$ertaings ' (a# e involve$.