ELECTRONIC GRADING SHEET

Colegio De Sta. Cecilia 108 Gen. T. De Leon Valenzuela City

“ELECTRONIC GRADING SYSTEM “ (EGS)

“In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements in Computer Research” Presented To: Mr. Jeffriel Galang Sison By: Lim, Michael Habaluyas, Jobeth Te, Beatriz Nagai, Kaori Hebron, Gehann Hadloc, Racell Paez, John Paul Francisco, Ariel

E G S Page CDSX

j

- ( C o l e g i o

D e

S t a

C e c i l i a 1 0 8 G e n T . D e l e o n , V a l e n z u e l a C i t y )

Acknowledgement: We would like to express gratitude to the following persons who helped make this project possible. To Mr. Eman Alvarez, Science teacher, for giving us some advice on how to start making this paperworks. We Love You Sir! To Mr. Jefferiel Sison, Our Computer teacher, for inspiring and motivating us, 4th year students Batch 2010-2011. THANK YOU Sir! Mrs. Betty Habaluyas, Jobeth’s mother, for providing materials in research study and also for her help and support. We would also like to thank our parents, classmates and all the people who help us made this project a very successful one. Thank you all. And lastly the God almighty for giving us some courage, strength and safety everyday.

E G S Page CDSX

j

- ( C o l e g i o

D e

S t a


Dedication: We, Dungs crew, would like to dedicate this project of ours to Mr. Crisanto Lim and to all IV- Proficiency batch 2010-2011. We are proud to present this to Mr. Jeffriel Sison because we tried our very best and all out efforts just to finish this project. We are lucky to have Mr. Crisanto Lim as our adviser and also as our 2nd father in school who are always there and give his support to us. He always remind us to do this and to do that ... He motivate us to be a good children and cecilian in our alma mater Colegio De Sta. Cecilia. E G S Page CDSX

j

- ( C o l e g i o

D e

S t a


WE SALUTE and THANK HIM!

ABSTRACT E G S Page CDSX

j

- ( C o l e g i o

D e

S t a


We decided to make this project, Electronic Grading System, to make our teachers work easier. We came up in making this application software because we want to improve our school mostly in grading system.

E G S Page CDSX

j

- ( C o l e g i o

D e

S t a


E G S Page CDSX

j

- ( C o l e g i o

D e

S t a


Chapter I

The Problem and Its Background E G S Page CDSX

j

- ( C o l e g i o

D e

S t a


Introduction Electronic Grading System The fast paced development of technology made everyone’s life changed. The turnover had been remarkable - better hardware and software are available almost every week. The development plays an essential role in developing the integral skills of a certain individuals. Its main role as of today is to make one’s life easier and productive.

The problem of proctors and teachers is encoding and calculating the grades of the students that’s why we created this program to help them and make their work easier and faster. The purpose of this study is to support and improve the grading system of CDSC (Colegio de Sta. Cecilia). The current grading system of CDSC, which uses Excel is difficult on the part of the user. Not all of the users are fully computer literate and they have to process the student grade by themselves without proper monitoring of the Principal. Moreover E.G.S is fixed.

E G S Page CDSX

j

- ( C o l e g i o

D e

S t a


In response to this problem, the solution is a user- friendly program, well guided system operation. The E.G.S is a system that can help to process the grading system of CDSC as well as monitoring the performance of the students.

Background of the Study Electronic Grading System

The current system of CDSC which uses Excel is difficult on the part of user. Not all the users are computer literate and they have to process the students’ grade by themselves without the proper monitoring of the Principal. The problem also in Excel is that environmental that can cause error in case the user clicked or pressed accidentally. While E.G.S is fixed to use by user. However the teacher has option to do computing manually if the E.G.S can’t support their needs. In response to this, the solution is a user-friendly program that can be accessed by the user.

CDSC is currently using Excel as means of computing student grades. In terms of Excel, it is not easy to the part of the teachers’ to access the grade of the students immediately as needed, because sometimes it can cause environmental

E G S Page CDSX

j

- ( C o l e g i o

D e

S t a


error.

Objectives Electronic Grading System

E G S Page CDSX

j

- ( C o l e g i o

D e

S t a


Our group’s main goal here is to help teachers. We thought that one of the problem of teachers is computing their students’ grades so we created this EGS (Electronic Grading System) to help them. Instead of using the old Ms. Excel to compute grades, we will use visual basic to make it easier. Sometimes just one mistake in Excel makes it go all wrong and you need to type all the needed formula just to compute it, unlike in Electronic Grading Sheet its automatic, no formulas needed. You will just enter the grade then voilà you will have the grade. It is also build to lessen the time used when doing students grades. The lesser time you used for working then the more time you’ll have for resting. More rest means less stress for teachers.

Conceptual Framework students

E G S ( C o l e g i o Page CDSX Teacher inputs -grade to EGS

C e c i l i a Teacher 1 0 8 Ginputs e n T . D to e EGS grade Grade l e o n ,

EGS co

j

D e S t a Student’s

V a l e n z u e l a

C i t y )

mputes and records the grades of the students. Grades ready to print

(optional)

Significance of the study Electronic Grading System

Traditionaly, the grading system of our school is based on bunch excel for the formula, etc. and by hand. All of the excel files are improtant so they need extra care about the files.

E G S Page CDSX

j

- ( C o l e g i o

D e

S t a


Instead of manually computes all the grades. the teacher can delegate most of their time in providing quality grades to their students. Data and other important information are backed up just in case something unexpected might happen.

In encoding the grades, sometimes things went wrong like pressing a wrong button might crash the application or ruin the grades. But using EGS it automatically erase the fears of crashing down the application.

E G S Page CDSX

j

- ( C o l e g i o

D e

S t a


E G S Page CDSX

j

- ( C o l e g i o

D e

S t a


Chapter II – E G S Page CDSX

j

- ( C o l e g i o

D e

S t a


Review of Related Literature and Studies Relevance of the Present Studies

Grading System Inventor: Nicholas Langdon Gunther USPTO Applicaton #: #20090226872 - Class: 434350 (USPTO)

Short Description of the Present Invention; Developing, Grading and Reporting The present invention comprises a grading system with some or all of the following features: users, including evaluators such as individual teachers, instructors, professors, teaching assistants, graders, test administrators, or one or more academic departments, faculties, schools, universities, text book writers or publishers, or any and all other persons acting as evaluators, responders, including students, candidates, E G S Page CDSX

j

- ( C o l e g i o

D e

S t a


applicants or other individuals or group or groups of individuals, to respond to instructions, instructions, including evaluations, tests, exams, quizzes and/or assignments, to evaluate, including to test, assess, examine, quiz, estimate, review, refresh, stimulate, challenge or renew, those responders\' capacities, including their knowledge, learning, experience, understanding, abilities, skills, performance, resources and/or capabilities, [4] methods for developing, including creating, reviewing, revising, modifying, extracting from, adding to, extending and/or enhancing, such instructions, methods to provide, including give, transfer, transmit, distribute, upload, download, email, reference, provide access to or make available, instructions to one or more responders, methods to obtain, including receive, transfer, transmit, distribute, upload, download, and/or obtain access to, responders\' responses to such instructions, including any answers to questions and/or completion of other tasks the instructions may include, a grading procedure to grade, including score, mark, assess or otherwise evaluate, the responders\' responses to such instructions, including by providing one or more numerical grades to such responses, to portions of such responses, to responses to particular instructions, or otherwise, in aggregate or separately, analysis methods for analyzing the results of such grading, including the grades, reporting methods for reporting the results of such grading or other evaluation, including the grades, and/or reporting such analysis, including some or all of the following: analyzing, assessing, compiling, storing, retrieving, publishing, reviewing, transferring, transmitting, distributing, formatting, extracting, monitoring, tracking, organizing, comparing, combining, displaying, compressing, recording, revising, and/or processing such results and/or such analysis, and/or 10] compilation methods for compiling, comparing or contrasting such reports or such analyses with one or more other reports or analyses, or with other materials or data, including other reports, analyses, materials or data in respect of one or more of the following: responders, users, including instructors or other evaluators, and institutions or institutional subdivisions, including academic departments. For purposes of this document, a person includes an individual, a group, division, company, entity, legal person (including a trust, partnership or corporation), department, faculty, school, university, college and/or other institution of learning, or other institution, government body, government agency and/or government authority, and private or public board or other organization of admission, approval, authorization, certification, examination, licensing, permission, qualification or testing. Concepts and Synonymy Among other procedures, the grading procedure of the present invention includes (sub)procedures to address synonymy and polysemy, which, as described below, are two fundamental problems confronting any grading procedure that is based on textual analysis. The grading procedure incorporates these procedures, as described in D]3) below. Synonymy refers to the problem that different words and phrases can mean the same thing, and an appropriate reference to any of several synonymous and equally correct

E G S Page CDSX

j

- ( C o l e g i o

D e

S t a


words or phrases must receive grading credit, without duplication—a reference to two synonyms should receive credit only once, not separate credit for each. The problem of polysemy is that a single word or phrase may have different meanings in different contexts. For purposes of this document, polysemy includes homonymy, arising when several words share the same spelling but have different meanings. As described in greater detail in D]3)iii) below, certain embodiments of the current invention includes methods for the user to develop and specify grading procedures that include procedures for addressing both synonymy and polysemy. These embodiments include grading procedures based on concepts. In these embodiments, a concept comprises specification of a structure of terms, or a terms structure, including one or more terms, such as words or phrases, to occur singly or a specified number of times, alone, together with or excluding other terms. The specification of occurrence with, or excluding, other terms may include proximity limits, such as requiring that the other terms occur (or not occur) within the same sentence, or paragraph, or within a specified number of characters, words, sentences, or paragraphs. Once the user has provided the term structure for one or more concepts, these embodiments provide as part of their grading procedure a procedure to search or otherwise analyze a response\'s text, and possibly other response properties, including word location, order and formatting, to see the extent to which the response is consistent with, or, in certain of the embodiments, matches, the specified terms structure(s). In the embodiments that provide matching methods (“Matching Embodiments”), the extent of matching between response and concept is treated as the extent to which the response appropriately references the concept and the associated terms. In several embodiments, therefore, a response is graded based on the extent to which that response is consistent with the concepts the user has specified. In certain of these embodiments, namely in the Matching Embodiments, consistency is determined based on the extent to which the response references each concept appropriately, based on matching. Examples of Matching Embodiments and other embodiments are described in D]3) below. To address synonymy, these embodiments provide the user methods to include, in a concept\'s terms structure, synonym groups, including groups of terms that are to be treated as synonymous, a reference to any one of which will be treated as a reference to the (same) concept. A synonym group thus represents the concept for which the terms in that group are synonyms. Certain of these embodiments provide the user with methods to specify weights for one or both of the following: (a) weights for concepts or synonym groups, reflecting the relative importance of the different concepts, (b) weights for individual synonymous terms, reflecting how closely associated with the corresponding concept the user specifies those terms to be. To address polysemy, these embodiments provide the user the ability to include in a concept\'s terms structure contextual requirements for terms to be treated as referenced in a response, and thus contextual requirements for receiving credit under the grading procedure for such references. By requiring a reference to a term to E G S Page CDSX

j

- ( C o l e g i o

D e

S t a


establish an appropriate context that justifies treating that reference as a reference to the associated concept, these embodiments provide a procedure to reduce the risk that an accidental or otherwise spurious reference to a term will be treated as a reference to that concept, thus reducing the risk of polysemy.

NEW ELECTRONIC GRADING SYSTEM AT BROOKLYN COLLEGE Adam jefferson Rickford PASSES FIRST TEST WITH FLYING COLORS Brooklyn, N.Y. -- Brooklyn College has launched WebGrade, a revolutionary electronic grading system that is the only one of its kind within the City University of New York. "The new system is a significant step in simplifying existing procedures and facilitating access to important information," said Christoph M. Kimmich, president of Brooklyn College, "and I welcome it. It will benefit faculty and students alike." The secure Web site allows faculty to submit grades onto an electronic roster from any computer that has Internet capability. Because of its simplicity and convenience, the new grading system has received an enthusiastic response throughout the Brooklyn College community. Nearly 80 percent of all fall semester grades were submitted through WebGrade, and, of those, 65 percent came from faculty members' home computers. "I encourage faculty in my department to use e-mail and other electronic resources," said Philip F. Gallagher, chairperson of the history department. "On-line grading seemed like the next logical step."

E G S Page CDSX

j

- ( C o l e g i o

D e

S t a


Aside from benefiting faculty, WebGrade virtually eliminates processing errors while allowing students quicker access to their grades. "It's easier to read than a computer printout and you don't have to go through a whole transcript," said Renette Calixte, a senior studying public communication. Joan Antonicelli, registrar, who worked with Mark Gold, director of Information Technology Systems, to implement the new WebGrade system said, "the grades were on the student's transcripts in record time. The faculty, students and staff were surprised and delighted with the effectiveness of the WebGrade system." Ms. Antonicelli added that the savings in scannable forms and labor would amount to thousands of dollars for Brooklyn College. Brooklyn College, founded in 1930, is one of the eleven senior colleges of the City University of New York. Located on a 26-acre tree-lined campus in Flatbush, it enrolls 15,000 undergraduate and graduate students who are representative of the diverse population of Brooklyn and New York City. The college, nationally known for its core curriculum, has been hailed as one of the "bright spots" in American higher education. For more information about Brooklyn College, visit the college Web site at www:brooklyn.cuny.edu

New grading system gets school board OK By John Ranallo [email protected] Published: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 1:15 PM CDT

The School District of Beloit has a new grading system and middle school principal after Tuesday’s board meeting. Mark Smullen, former interim principal of Beloit Memorial High School, will serve as the new principal for Aldrich Middle School. Smullen will be replacing Walter James, who is leaving Aldrich to become principal of Rock Cut Elementary School in Loves Park, Ill. Smullen will begin serving as principal effective July 1. The board also chose to adopt Superintendent Milt Thompson’s new grading system which will begin in the fall. Thompson is now focused on implementation of the system. According E G S Page CDSX

j

- ( C o l e g i o

D e

S t a


to the board business packet the goal of the new grading system is to help students increase effort so their academic performance is reflective of their true potential and capability. The new system aims to promote mastery of material. Thompson said the current grading system is not working and is ineffective at preventing student failure. Under the new grading system, the lowest acceptable grade a student can receive is a C. The new system replaces letter grades of D and F with grades of I and M, though it is possible teachers will still be permitted to use D and F. Work below a C must be made up or the student will have to attend summer school. One of the primary focuses of the grading system is communication. Thompson said the system will increase feedback for students, teachers and parents as the system will also feature real-time grades every few weeks. Teachers will also be required to fill out an electronic grade book via the Skyward online management program. Grades of M will be used for missing work while grades of I will be designated for work that is handed in but is less than C quality work. All work below C quality must be redone; however, the highest grade a student can earn on a retake is a B. Students who fail to complete work will be enrolled in an alternative summer school program that centers on completing missing work. Prior to its approval, Thompson held discussions with nearly all departments and received input from teachers, parents and students across the district. He also piloted the system in several departments. The vote to approve the grading policy passed by a vote of 5-0 as board members Shannon Scharmer and John Winkelmann were not in attendance for the business meeting.

E G S Page CDSX

j

- ( C o l e g i o

D e

S t a


The school board also approved purchases of over $15,000 for Novell, Weidenhammer Systems Corp. and Norlight Inc. and adopted antibullying curriculum which is aligned to standards set by the Department of Public Instruction. The school board also amended and reposted the job description for the district’s Community and School Relations position— currently held by Melissa Badger— to reflect extra responsibilities. The position will also come with an increased salary as determined by the superintendent and board of education.

Grade Crossing Electronic Document Management System (GCEDMS) Chace thompson What is a Grade Crossing Electronic Document Management Systems?

Grade Crossing Electronic Document Management Systems (GCEDMS) are typically webbased methods of facilitating railroad-related internal communications, electronic document storage, and expedited external communications between the state DOT, public utility commission, railroad companies, and the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA). Railroad companies typically are able to securely submit and view documents through the web that pertain to projects in which they are involved. These systems may allow electronic submission of rail crossing inventory data as required under recently expanded and clarified FRA highwayrail crossing inventory reporting requirements. Benefits Grade Crossing Electronic Document Management Systems (GCEDMS), as have been developed recently by PennDOT and several other states, have proven to be of great benefit in facilitating internal railroad crossing communications and necessary external communications between the state DOT, the Federal Rail Authority (FRA), and railroad companies. Railroad companies are able to securely submit and view documents through the web that pertain to projects in which they are involved. A more detailed listing of benefits made possible by GCEDMS systems is provided below. a.

E G S Page CDSX

j

1. Public Safety and Operational Benefits: Public safety at grade crossings is improved through improved planning data.

- ( C o l e g i o

D e

S t a


b.

Grade crossing locations may be linked to a GIS mapping system using latitude and longitude coordinates. c. Aerial imagery and ground photographs of the crossings may be stored in the database, reducing need for travel to crossing sites when limited additional information is necessary in the office. d. GCEDMS may be used to generate reports for operational use in decision making. e. An electronic system can provide direct links to other references such as the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and the US DOT Web Accident Prediction System (WBAPS). f. GCEDMS allows optimization of the distribution of limited highway-rail crossing safety funds so that they are targeted to the highway-rail crossings that pose the greatest risk to loss of human life and collateral property damage. g. GCEDMS systems are flexible enough to allow addition of enhancements. 2. a.

Facilitated Compliance with New Federal Inventory Requirements The Rail Safety Improvement Act of 2008 (RSIA 2008) requires railroad companies and states to regularly update the national inventory file. These systems allow automated submission of inventory updates. b. An accurate inventory is required in support of the Emergency Notification System (ENS) for posting toll-free telephone numbers to report problems in emergencies. 3. Improved National Inventory Information a. GCEDMS systems allow improvement in consistency of data within the national inventory of highway-rail crossings. National inventory information becomes more current and accurate through automated submission of inventory updates. b. State data discrepancies are minimized. c. State data, railroad data and US DOT National Inventory File data may be are reconciled. d. Exchange of data with the FRA and railroads may be is simplified and expedited. e. A simplified method of storing and transferring data to and from the FRA may be is provided. 4.

Improved Internal Management Methods and Tools:

a. GCEDMS is a project management tool that allows for the efficient and effective management, planning, and document storage of railroad crossing project information (Ex. Section 130). Project funding may also be tracked. b. Project prioritization and selection processes are facilitated when approving the use of Federal funds for Section 130 projects. c. Various railroad forms are immediately available to our railroad business partners.

E G S Page CDSX

j

- ( C o l e g i o

D e

S t a


d. Facilitated validation and justification of crossing safety programs. e. Moving from electronic document storage to data management. 5.

Cost Effectiveness Improvement:

a. b.

Significantly reduced travel costs to grade crossing sites to make decisions. This is a move toward becoming a greener public agency. Reduced paper and reduced emissions (from reduced travel). c. Reduced legal inquiries if data is made public. d. Cost effectiveness of public funding is improved, allowing best use of limited funding.

Grading system John Mark levenstin

Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush visited Utah the other day, extolling his state’s education reform and inspiring at least two Utah legislators to promise a bill modeled after the Florida system of grading schools. Bush said Florida has improved elementary school students’ test scores by giving public schools grades A, B, C, D or F for how well their students perform and how much progress they make year to year. The plan also rewards high-achieving schools and punishes schools that don’t make the grade. It blocks third-graders who don’t read at grade level from advancing, requires tougher courses for graduation, encourages charter schools, and advocates for tax credits or vouchers for parents who want their children out of a school graded D or F. Sen. Wayne Niederhauser, R-Sandy, and Rep. Greg Hughes, R-Draper, are drafting legislation modeled after the Florida system. But if the two legislators spend some time researching how such a law would work in Utah, they’ll find it would be both redundant and meaningless, given the realities of underfunded Utah schools.

E G S Page CDSX

j

- ( C o l e g i o

D e

S t a


Though struggling to make ends meet, the Utah Office of Education is already working toward tougher graduation requirements and trying to ensure that children in the first three grades learn to read. The federal No Child Left Behind law already labels “failing” schools and lays down consequences not unlike those in Florida. But in the final analysis, trying to achieve Florida’s success would require a bigger investment in education than the Utah Legislature appears willing to make. Utah schools have the largest class sizes in the nation; Florida has a constitutional amendment to limit the size of classes. Utah is dead last in per-pupil funding for schools at $5,765 (in 2008, the most recent data available) while Florida spends $9,084. If Niederhauser and Hughes could somehow bring Utah in line with Florida in the amount of money available to schools to meet achievement standards, then a system of grading schools similar to Florida’s might work here. But where would Utah get the money to reward schools that get A grades? And how would Utah schools make required improvements without the necessary resources? It would be akin to withholding a math textbook from a student and then giving him an F when he can’t solve the problems. Using a biblical analogy, teachers can’t make bricks without straw. If legislators would do their homework, they might find that if they want higher test scores, it’s only fair to give schools the tools they need to get the job done.

E G S Page CDSX

j

- ( C o l e g i o

D e

S t a


Local Literature and Studies Relevant of the Present Studies.

E G S Page CDSX

j

- ( C o l e g i o

D e

S t a


ABC GRADING SYSTEM John Cruz III “The cost-effective complete school automation” computerized enrollment system ABC is a complete solution package that is specifically designed for school processes automation. This 13-in-1 system answers the varied needs of the administration, staff, teachers, students and parents. Admission and Curriculum Management Interconnected interface for course administration, student information, course subjects and fees. Registration and Class Management User-friendly interface for class management, schedule preparation and student registration. Enrollment Payment Procedures Total automation of tuition recomputation, course subjects, fee assessments and balance checking. Grading Automation Procedures Fast input and output time for grading students online Students Web Portal Internet-ready portal providing students viewing information on their class schedules, curriculum track, attendance record,current attendance status, student E G S Page CDSX

j

- ( C o l e g i o

D e

S t a


concerns and enrollment balances. Entrance Examination Automation Module Paperless entrance exam test with quick score generation and assessment. Students Concerns Monitoring Module Unified processing of student’s pending duties and fees for clearance purposes Management Information System for Academic Executives System overview through graphical charts and managerial types of reports of the ABC Subsystems. Advisory / MIS Module for Deans and Coordinators System overview of the academic subsystems including faculty monitoring, registrar records and student grades. Library Managment Full-featured module for searching, borrowing, returning and inventory of books. Attendance Monitoring Centers on campus security and student entrance/exit tracking. Speech Laboratory Management Full-featured module for speech programs that can record and playback voice. Barcode-ready* Cafeteria Basic Inventory and Point-of-Sales Management Cashless system that automates food purchases, sales and stocks inventory management.

E G S Page CDSX

j

- ( C o l e g i o

D e

S t a


Grading System Kiosk Polytechnic University of the Philippines

Grading is a complex topic that involves philosophical, pedagogical, and pragmatic issues for all students. We all have our own ideas of how grades should be assigned, and what they should tell us about the student's performance. Since the Polytechnic University of the Philippines – SMB Campus, the Grading system of this University has gone under qualitative and quantitative changes. As far as quantitative changes are concerned, this proposal provides an overview of the PUPIANS grading system. A critical assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of the PUPIANS grading system requires an in-depth analysis of its structure, which goes beyond the scope of this proposal. This proposal, nevertheless, seeks to provide basic information about the grading system in PUP for those who are interested in becoming familiar with this system. The main objective of this paper is to propose an effective and friendly used grading system in PUPSMB. It shows the final grades of a student and the computation of the grade both midterm and finals. This proposal helps the student to be aware to their grade if he/she is failed or pass the specific subject.

E G S Page CDSX

j

- ( C o l e g i o

D e

S t a


Computerized Grading System With Sms Capability Colegio de San Lorenzo Ruiz de Manila

The 1988 local election paved the way to the creation and establishment of Colegio de San Lorenzo Ruiz de Manila. Dr. Gilda Figueroa-Carpio ran in 1988 for Mayor in the Municipality of Catarman, Northern Samar. Unfortunately, her efforts and charm was not enough in order to win the mayoralty position.. Nonetheless, it was also the time that she saw the sufferings and sad plight of her fellow Catarmananons, especially in the delivery of basic health services in the far-flung barangays of Catarman and the rest of Northern Samar. Her electoral defeat and sad experience was her big challenge, thus, Dr. Gilda F. Carpio did not make her time fruitless and idle. She made a complete turnaround of her dreams and priorities for public service, from politics to academe. With the help of her beloved husband who is likewise a doctor in profession, Dr. Rolando Recibe Carpio, a native of Aklan, they founded the San Lorenzo Ruiz de Manila School of Midwifery on September 28, 1990, a non-stock, non-profit private educational institution. The school was named after the first Filipino Saint, San Lorenzo Ruiz de Manila. It was Dr. Rolando Carpio who was chosen the name to honor San Lorenzo whom he believed was instrumental in the recovery of his sister from stage IV cervical cancer. Like any other business or profession it was not made easy for the couple, especially the establishment of the building and facilities, but because of their persistence and desire to establish and start the operation of the school, they decided to sacrifice their own residential house in Barangay Calachuchi,

E G S Page CDSX

j

- ( C o l e g i o

D e

S t a


Catarman, Northern Samar and converted it into a two room school. The first initial enrollment consisted of 78 midwifery students.

Grading System LAN BASED SCHOOLARSHIP EXAMINATION FOR ASIAN INSTITUTE OF COMPUTER STUDIES CALOOCAN conducted on First Semester SY 2010-2011

Computers are capable to turn a Manual System to a Computer-Based System to reduce tedious tasks such as evaluating, measuring and recording. Asian Institute of Computer Studies (AICS) at present is administering the scholarship exam on hand. Administering, checking, filing and organizing the list of examinees are still done. The Asian Institute of Computer Studies opened on November 1996 with a pioneer branch in Fairview, Quezon City. In 2001, Asian Institute of Computer Studies opened a Bachelor of Science in Computer Science along with other existing programs at Grace Park, Caloocan City. With its total of nine years in existence, AICS still vows to continually expand, extend its services and take part in the building up of the future generation in this modern world of Information Technology. Asian Institute of Computer Studies (AICS) at present is administering the scholarship exam on hand. Administering, checking, filing and organizing the list of examinees are still done on papers, which are susceptible to errors and loss of data. E G S Page CDSX

j

- ( C o l e g i o

D e

S t a


Automated Grading System EDUARDO BARRETTO SR. NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL Canta, Lester U.

The grade of a student is a scale which determines students who need more improvement and require more assistance which will help teachers in guiding them towards their development. It also shows where students excel most so they can be honed and encouraged to continue their good work, improve more, and aim higher. At the end, it will be the reference for the judgment of whether a student can step up to a higher level of learning or remain to be polished.

From these

reasons, it is clearly concluded how important it is to make sure that the grades of the students are accurately calculated and safely stored in a well-founded database. It is understood that in the traditional grading system, where only calculators and papers are present, it is very difficult and time-consuming to compute grades. Errors are more likely to occur and papers are not very reliable form of database. It is very stressful to calculate grades and check them repeatedly from one record to another. With the use of the Automated Grading System, the teachers will only have to input the raw grades of the students and the system will be the one to do the computations and storing of files.

This Automated Grading System can

provide the good service of accurate calculation and secured compilation of grades to those hard-working teachers. E G S Page CDSX

j

- ( C o l e g i o

D e

S t a


Relevance of the Present Studies EGS ( electronic grading system)

The relevance of our EGS or should we say electronic grading system is that they all lessen the hard work of teachers encoding the grades of the student and helps in computing and keeping the grades of the student. When i say “keeping the grades” i meant by this is that it helps keeping the record of the grade because EGS is databse type of program. Once you put a grade to EGS and click “Add” it automatically computes the grade and add it to the database connected, just like other EGS it is a Efficient and user-friendly program.

In relevance to others creating this project was never easy but we didn’t lose hope because like the articles above they all went through hardship just to make those projects successful.

E G S Page CDSX

j

- ( C o l e g i o

D e

S t a


E G S Page CDSX

j

- ( C o l e g i o

D e

S t a


E G S Page CDSX

j

- ( C o l e g i o

D e

S t a


ELECTRONIC GRADING SHEET

Recommend Documents