New Igc 3 Jan 2012 v2 = New New New

NEBOSH UNITISED I.G.C. IGC 3 2011/2012 Wasyl Terych & M Kamarajan

This reference material is aimed at the unitised NEBOSH IGC Unit 3 Practical Application. It has been designed in such a way that it provides a guide to candidates to successfully complete the requirements of this course unit.

This Page is Intentionally Blank

FOREWORD TO NEBOSH IGC UNIT 3 – REVISION FOR 2012 This guide has been generated for the benefit of candidates who are to take the IGC 3 as part of their suite of examinations/assessments for their NEBOSH International General Certificate. The 2012 has been revised and updated from the previous requirements and the authors of this guide feel that the new requirement has improved guidelines as to what is expected from candidates, thus allowing a more structured approach to practical assignment compilation and marking. Candidates can utilise the knowledge gained in their studies of Units 1 and 2of this course and put it to good use in their IGC 3 practical assignment. Candidates are strongly recommended to read this course supplement and to raise any questions that they have on the content with their Course Tutor prior to the submission of their IGC 3 practical assignment.


NEBOSH IGC Contents Listing

Table of Contents Foreword to NEBOSH IGC Unit 3 – Revision For 2012 ....................................................................................... 3 About the And MArkers of the IGC For ETA Consultancy ................................................................................. 7 About the Editor ..................................................................................................................................................... 7 An Opening Thought ............................................................................................................................................. 9 The Assessors Marking Sheet ........................................................................................................................... 11 The Observation Sheet ...................................................................................................................................... 13 Date of Assessment .......................................................................................................................................... 14 Observation Sheet ............................................................................................................................................. 14 Completion of Observation Sheets ................................................................................................................ 14 1.0 1.1 1.2

Completion of Observation Sheets .......................................................................................................... 17 Range and Number of HAzards / Good Practices ............................................................................... 17 Identification of Suitable Control Measures and timescales ..................................................................... 19

Table 1 – Typical Issues ................................................................................................................................ 20 Completion of Report......................................................................................................................................... 21 2.0 2.1

Management Report ................................................................................................................................ 23 Introduction Providing an Overview of the Chosen Area ..................................................................... 23

Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 23 3.0

Report – Main Findings of the Inspection ................................................................................................. 25

3.1

Quality of Interpretation of Findings and Clear Reference to Strengths and Weaknesses .................. 25

3.2

Identification of Possible Breaches of International Standards ............................................................ 25

3.3

Persuasiveness / Conciseness / Technical Content ............................................................................ 26

4.0

Report – Conclusions and Recommendations ......................................................................................... 27

4.1 Clear and Concise Conclusions Which are Clearly Related to Report Findings and are Effective in Convincing Management to Take Action ....................................................................................................... 27 4.2

Recommendations Which Present Realistic Actions to Improve Health and Safety in the Chosen Area 27

Appendix 1......................................................................................................................................................... 29 IGC3 – The Health and Safety Practical Application ...................................................................................... 29 Appendix 2 – Observation Exercises ................................................................................................................. 31 Appendix 3 – Some General Hazard Spotting Practice Pictures ..................................................................... 57


Page 5 of 61

NEBOSH IGC Contents Listing

Page 6 of 61

ABOUT THE AND MARKERS OF THE IGC FOR ETA CONSULTANCY Wasyl Terych is an internationally respected occupational health and safety professional with well over thirty years’ experience that spans many industrial, public and commercial sectors in many countries of the world. Wasyl commenced his health and safety focus as far back as when he was an engineering apprentice with AEI GEC way back in 1968 and this saw him in his 20’s working as workplace and later Trade Union Appointed Safety Representative serving on local as well as national committees. Later on in his career Wasyl went into consultancy and has worked with some well-known international organisations. He currently works in Dubai in the United Arab Emirates as a Senior Manager in a consultancy and training organisation attached to one of the region’s largest employers with 70,000 plus workers in the UAE alone. His work as a safety professional, mentor and trainer has seen him engaged in projects around the UK, into most of Europe, North and Central Africa, the GCC, Sri Lanka, the Philippines and more. Wasyl has a MA in Health, Safety and Environmental Law from Salford University (UK) as well as numerous other degrees and qualifications including the NEBOSH National Diploma in Occupational Safety and Health. In his training and advisory role Wasyl delivers courses as well as writing course books and associated materials for students, candidates and learners taking UK and International qualifications in health, safety and environment management as well as food safety. When asked to write the first International General Certificate Course Book he was so pleased, he saw it as a chance to help and guide people on the right road to understanding health and safety at an early stage of life and hopefully advance into a career into health and safety, and regardless become more aware of the topic thus preventing harm to themselves and hopefully many others in the course of their lifetime as he surely has. This current publication is the 12 determined by NEBOSH.

th

revision and has been written to abide by the 2011/12 course syllabus as

ABOUT THE EDITOR M. Kamarajan has many years’ experience as a trainer in both the mechanical engineering as well as health and safety arenas in countries such as India and the Middle East. Within health and safety he delivers training and awareness sessions to many governmental and industry sectors with a particular focus on construction. Kamarajan has the role of General Manager within ETA Consultancy, but also carries the responsibility for over 180 Health and Safety professionals as the ETA Ascon Group HSE Manager. He is also Honorary Secretary to the Emirates Safety Group which is very active NGO within the UAE which meets as a forum to discuss general matters relating to HS and E. As Editor Kamarajan has played a significant part in the way this material is presented to the international candidate, importantly ensuring readability and clarity which has been greatly appreciated by readers and candidates alike of the years that this course has been delivered by ETA Consultancy in the countries in which they operate.

NEBOSH IGC Unit 1 Element 5 – Health and Safety Management Systems 4 – Measuring, Audit and Review


ETA Consultancy ® 2012 © WNT/IGC 3

Issue Number 1 2012

Page 8 of 61

AN OPENING THOUGHT

FAIL TO PREPARE PREPARE TO FAIL

NEBOSH IGC 3 Practical Application Based on the 2012 Requirements



Issue Number 1 2012

Page 10 of 61


THE ASSESSORS MARKING SHEET The sheet illustrated below is the form that will be used by IGC 3 Markers to declare your ‘Assignment’ marks to NEBOSH. The following pages are the matrixes used to determine your marks – please view these in detail and ensure that when you complete your IGC 3 assignment you present material that will maximise your marks.

Course Provider Number

Course Provider Name

Student Number

Student Name Maximum Marks Available

Criteria

1

Completion of observation Sheets

1.1

Range and number of hazards/good practice

15

1.2

Identification of suitable control measures and timescales

15

2

Report – Introduction and Executive Summary

2.1

Introduction providing an overview of the chosen area

5

2.2

Executive summary

5

3

Report – Main findings of the inspection

3.1

Quality of interpretation of findings and clear reference to strengths and weaknesses

15

3.2

Identification of possible breaches on international standards

5

3.3

Persuasiveness / conciseness / technical content

10

4

Report – Conclusions and Recommendations

4.1

Clear and concise conclusions which are clearly related to report findings and are effective in convincing management to take action

15

4.2

Recommendations which present realistic actions to improve health and safety in the chosen area

15

Total Marks

100


Assessors Marks Awarded

NEBOSH Moderated Marks (If Different)

Issue Number 1 2012

Page 11 of 61




Issue Number 1 2012

Page 12 of 61


THE OBSERVATION SHEET What follows is the observation sheet that has to be completed by candidates undertaking the IGC 3 ‘the Practical Application’. The following pages are meant to guide candidates through the completion of this section of the application and later – the ‘Management Report’.

INTERNATIONAL GENERAL CERTIFICATE

Candidate’s observation

(2010 specification)

sheet

IGC3 – THE HEALTH AND SAFETY PRACTICAL APPLICATION Sheet number

of _____

Student name _______________________________________

Student number _________________

Place inspected _____________________________________

Date of inspection ___ / _____ / _____

Observations

Control measures

Timescale

Hazards / Good practice

Immediate, medium and longer-term actions

(immediate, 1 week, etc


Issue Number 1 2012

Page 13 of 61


DATE OF ASSESSMENT Assessment of the practical unit (IGC3) must normally take place within 14 days of the date of the IGC1 and/or IGC2 written papers (the ‘date of the examination’). If a candidate is absent from the written papers because of illness corroborated by a doctor’s note, but successfully completes the IGC3 unit within the 14 day deadline, the result will stand. If a candidate is unable to complete the NGC3 unit under similar circumstances, NEBOSH may allow it to be taken at a later date beyond the normal 14 day deadline – but candidates must inform ETA Consultancy as soon as possible so that the appropriate notifications can be made.. ETA Consultancy will advise the candidate of the latest date by which the completed report and observation sheets must be received by them for marking. Candidates are advised that the completion of study for both IGC1 and IGC2 is recommended in order to undertake the practical application unit IGC3.

OBSERVATION SHEET COMPLETION OF OBSERV ATION SHEETS Candidates will be supplied with a sufficient number of observation sheets from ETA Consultancy which may be photocopied for the purpose. An example observation sheet is given earlier. The observation sheets must be completed during the inspection and no alterations should be made to it. Only brief details of each hazard are required including: 1.

Where the hazard was located and

2.

The nature of the hazard.

For example, ‘housekeeping could be better’ does not give enough information about the particular hazard. Candidates should avoid the tendency to simply identify the tasks being undertaken, or the equipment that is being used, instead of providing an indication of how the tasks or items of equipment pose a risk. Candidates must demonstrate their understanding of how identified hazards have the potential to cause harm, for example, boxes stored on the floor may cause obstruction of access, egress routes and / or a risk of musculoskeletal injury if lifted. The observation sheets should be completed by: •

Identifying, in the left hand column, any hazards, unsafe work practices and examples of good practice observed during the inspection;

•

Providing in the next column, an indication of the urgency of taking action (high, medium or low priority) which should reflect the level of risks.

•

Commenting, in the next column on the adequacy of existing controls and identifying any immediate, medium term and long term remedial actions needed;

•

Stating, in the right hand column a reasonable timescale for the actions identified.

The distinction between timescales and priorities should be expanded – i.e., that a low priority action, in terms of risk, might still be completed quickly because it can be done easily; conversely the most appropriate solution for a high priority (high risk) area might only be possible in the longer term (in which case interim measures might be necessary). There should be sufficient information on the observation sheets to enable the candidate to complete a comprehensive report to management on their findings. Candidates are also advised to make notes on the area inspected, including activities taking place, in order to complete the introduction to their report.


Issue Number 1 2012

Page 14 of 61

NEBOSH IGC 3 Practical Application Based on the 2012 Requirements Whilst poor spelling and grammar will not be marked or penalised, if the assessor is unable to read or to understand the notes made by candidates during their inspection then invariably fewer marks will be awarded than would otherwise have been the case. What Has to be Submitted for Marking to be Undertaken The submission to ETA Consultancy for marking must include the following: 1.0

Completed observation sheets covering a number and range of hazards and good practice, identifying suitable control measures and timescales

2.0

An Introduction and Summary

3.0

Main findings of the completed inspection

4.0

Conclusions which summarise the main issues identified in the candidate’s workplace

5.0

Completed Recommendations table.

6.0

The candidate declaration form

Note The practical application must be carried out in the candidate’s own workplace. The workplace should be large enough to provide a sufficient range of hazards in the areas covered to provide and adequate range for identification. If the workplace is very large, in order that the practical application is manageable the candidate should limit the area considered. Where a candidate does not have access to a workplace, ETA Consultancy (your course provider) should be consulted and we will help in making arrangements for that candidate to carry out the application at suitable premises. Management of the premises being used should be consulted to ensure that the candidate can carry out the inspection without endangering their own health and safety. Where confidentiality requires, locations and company names may be omitted from the report, but ETA Consultancy need to be made aware of this so that they can comply with the appropriate NEBOSH requirements in this regard.

This information regarding what has to be submitted to ETA Consultancy to allow marking of the practical application is repeated later in this material Please be sure you are clear on these requirements.


Issue Number 1 2012

Page 15 of 61




Issue Number 1 2012

Page 16 of 61


1.0

COMPLETION OF OBSERVATION SHEETS

1.1

RANGE AND NUMBER OF HAZARDS / GOOD PRACTICES 1 1 – Range and number of hazards / good practices Marks To Be Awarded

Completion of Observation sheets

11 to 15

6 - 10

Appropriate hazards/good practice for the chosen area

Appropriate hazards/good practice for the chosen area

4 to 5 different types of hazards identified 14 to 20 uncontrolled hazards identified

2 to 3 different types of hazards identified 7 to 13 uncontrolled hazards identified

1-5

Some appropriate hazards/good practice for the chosen area 1 type of hazard identified 1 to 6 uncontrolled hazards identified

If no reference to good practice take mark down by one mark, e.g. 3 types of issues but no reference to good practice – 2 marks to be awarded 1 – Typical issues are listed in table 1 and internal assessors must complete table 1 on allocating marks 2 – Only one example of good practice is required for the mark to be awarded Candidates are expected to identify different types of hazard such as hazardous substances, fire, electrical, machinery, ergonomic, housekeeping, noise, vibration, transport, manual handling and health hazards and should also consider if there are any welfare and environmental problems. At least five different types of hazard must be included for maximum marks. Candidates are expected to comment on situations where there is adequate control of hazards and where good practice is being observed, although candidates should place the emphasis on uncontrolled hazards. Table 1 that follows indicates 20 typical issues, but candidates are reminded that the list is not an exhaustive one and they may include relevant issues that they identify during their observation exercise. Markers will consider all topic areas and will mark them accordingly if relevant. Think back to your IGC Units 1 and 2 – included in these study units there are many topic areas discussed and workplaces often contain others. Be sure to include at least ONE example of good practice.


Issue Number 1 2012

Page 17 of 61




Issue Number 1 2012

Page 18 of 61


1.2 IDENTIFICATION OF SUITABLE CONTROL MEASURES AND TIMESCALES 1 2 – Identification of Suitable Control Measures and timescales Marks To Be Awarded 11 to 15 All sections of the observation sheet completed Completion of Observation sheets

Immediate, medium and longer-term actions identified for 14 to 20 hazards All / most recommended actions effective in reducing risk and realistic in terms timescales

6 - 10

All sections of the observation sheet completed Identification of mainly immediate actions for the identified hazards Recommended actions generally effective in reducing risk and realistic in terms of timescales

1-5

Some sections of the observation sheet completed Reference to immediate actions only Recommended actions limited in reducing risk and unrealistic in terms of timescales

1.

Candidates who repeat identical hazards will only be awarded one mark for that hazard

2.

Candidates who repeat similar hazards relating to different areas or equipment may only be awarded a maximum three marks for that particular hazard type. For example the repeated identification of machinery guarding, missing or damaged would only ever attract three marks maximum.

3.

Assessors must complete Table 1 to assist in allocating marks

Candidates are expected to give thought to what is required to immediately control the risk from each identified hazard AND to identify the need for medium and long term actions to control the risk. This requires candidates to distinguish between the symptoms and the root causes of hazards. For example, the immediate action on a spillage may be ‘clean up spillage and inform supervisor’ whereas medium term actions might include appropriate supervisor training, regular inspections, and investigation of the source of the leak. A longer term action may be to modify the work process to tackle the root cause. If existing controls are in place and considered adequate, candidates should consider any measures required to maintain this level of control. Candidates should avoid generic phrases being repeatedly used e.g. ‘monitor’ and ‘train staff’. Candidates should give appropriate clarification by giving examples of appropriate monitoring and the type of training required. Candidates should be aware that if unsuitable control measures are suggested full marks cannot be awarded. Short term measures to improve housekeeping will do little to improve the lack of safety management systems and procedures evidenced by materials and equipment left lying around. The proposed control measures must not only remove or control the hazard but must also be realistic in terms of timescales.


Issue Number 1 2012

Page 19 of 61


TABLE 1 – TYPICAL ISSUES 1. and 2. Range of issues identified and number of hazards Issue Range (/ if covered)

Issue Description

Number of Hazards Identified

Comments

Electricity Ergonomics Falling Objects Fire First Aid Good Practice Hazardous Substances Housekeeping Information Machinery Manual Handling Noise Obstructions (trailing Cables) Personal Protective Equipment Signage Vehicle Routes Vibration Welfare / Hygiene Working at Height Work Environment Any Other Appropriate

Total


Issue Number 1 2012

Page 20 of 61


COMPLETION OF REPORT The practical application may be submitted in either the candidates own handwriting or be word processed. There is no time limit assigned to the practical application, however, candidates should aim to complete the process of observation and report writing within two hours (unless reasonable adjustments have been agreed by NEBOSH). Candidates should refer to the practical unit marking sheet (included earlier in this guidance document) for the headings under which marks will be allocated for the report and observation sheets in order to help structure their report. Candidates must not use previously prepared or organisation checklists, or any other prompts. The report should not contain photographs, printed text or any other extraneous material. The length of the report should be between 500 and 750 words and should not simply duplicate the observation sheets. The report should be written in such terms that a manager would be able to take reasonable action based on facts. Reports based on unsupported generalities and those that simply reiterate the contents of the observation sheets will be awarded low marks.


Issue Number 1 2012

Page 21 of 61


INTERNATIONAL GENERAL CERTIFICATE

Candidate report template

(2010 specification) UNIT IGC3 – THE HEALTH AND SAFETY PRACTICAL APPLICATION

Student number ________________________________

Location ______________________________________

Date of review

/

/

Structure report under the following headings: Introduction including overview of area inspected and activities taking place

Executive Summary

Main findings of the inspection

Conclusions

Recommendations – include as a table in the following format:

Recommendation


Likely resource implications

Priority

Review date

Issue Number 1 2012

Page 22 of 61


2.0

MANAGEMENT REPORT

2.1

INTRODUCTION PROVIDING AN OVERVIEW OF THE CHOSEN AREA 2.1 Introduction Providing an Overview of the Chosen Area Marks To Be Awarded 4 to 5

Clear and appropriate description of the chosen area and of the activities occurring in the area

2 to 3

Description of the chosen area and of the activities in the area

1 Limited description of the chosen area Lack of details on the activities taking place in the area

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2.2 Executive Summary Marks To Be Awarded 4 to 5 Concise overview of important points and main conclusions / recommendations


2 to 3 Overview of some important points and some conclusions / recommendations

1

Limited overview

Issue Number 1 2012

Page 23 of 61




Issue Number 1 2012

Page 24 of 61


3.0

REPORT – MAIN FINDINGS OF THE INSPECTION

3.1 QUALITY OF INTERPRETATION OF FINDINGS AND CLEAR REFERENCE TO STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES 3.1 Quality of interpretation of findings and clear reference to strengths and weaknesses Marks To Be Awarded 11 to 15 Quality of interpretation of findings and clear reference to strengths and weaknesses

3.2

6 to 10

1 to 5

Logical progression from the observation sheets

Logical progression from the observation sheets

Key issues identified in observation sheets have been appropriately discussed

Some key issues identified in observation sheets have been appropriately discussed

Clear reference to strengths and weaknesses

Some reference to strengths and weaknesses

Limited progression from the observation sheets Limited discussion of the key issues identified in the observation sheets Limited reference to strengths and weaknesses

IDENTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE BREACHES OF INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS 3.2 Identification of possible breaches of international standards Marks To Be Awarded 5

Identification of possible breaches of international standards

Appropriate reference to 5 possible breaches of international standards Demonstration of a clear understanding of the reasons for all of the breaches


4 Appropriate reference to 4 possible breaches of international standards Demonstration of a clear understanding of the reasons for the breaches for the majority of the breaches

3

2

1

Appropriate reference to 3 possible breaches of international standards

Appropriate reference to 2 possible breaches of international standards

Some demonstration of understanding of the reasons for some of the breaches

Some demonstration of understanding of the reasons for some of the breaches

A list of international standards with no explanation of how the international standards were breached, or how they relate to the hazards, unsafe conditions or work practices selected

Issue Number 1 2012

Page 25 of 61


3.3

PERSUASIVENESS / CONCISENESS / TECHNI CAL CONTENT 3.3 Persuasiveness / Conciseness / Technical Content Marks To Be Awarded 8 to 10 Clear legal, moral and financial arguments

Persuasiveness / Conciseness / Technical Content

Convinces management to take action Report is well structured and appropriate length Report does not duplicate observation sheets


4 to 7

Some legal, moral and financial arguments Some persuasiveness in management action

1 to 3 Limited legal, moral and financial arguments Limited persuasiveness in management action Report is poorly structured

Some duplication of observation sheets

Report duplicates observation sheets

Issue Number 1 2012

Page 26 of 61


REPORT – CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

4.0

4.1 CLEAR AND CONCISE CONCLUSIONS WHICH ARE CLEARLY RELATED TO REPORT FINDINGS AND ARE EFFECTIVE IN CONVINCING MANAGEMENT TO TAKE ACTION 4.1 – Clear and concise conclusions which are clearly related to report findings and are effective in convincing management to take action Marks To Be Awarded Clear and concise conclusions which are clearly related to report findings and are effective in convincing management to take action

11 to 15

6 to 10

Findings in the report summarized clearly and concisely

Logical progression from the report

Relevant and appropriate information provided to persuade management to take action

Some key issues identified in the report have been appropriately discussed

1 to 5

Limited progression from the report Limited discussion of the key issues identified in the report

4.2 RECOMMENDATIONS WHICH PRESENT REALISTIC ACTIONS TO IMPROVE HEALTH AND S AFETY IN THE CHOSEN AREA 4.2

Recommendations which present realistic actions to improve health and safety in the chosen area Marks To Be Awarded 11 to 15

Recommendations which present realistic actions to improve health and safety in the chosen area

Recommendations based upon conclusions Realistic recommendations Appropriately prioritized recommendations Appropriate cost estimations for all recommendations


6 to 10 Most recommendations follow on from the conclusions Most recommendations are realistic Some attempt at prioritization

1 to 5

Limited progression from conclusions Recommendations not all realistic Limited cost estimations

Appropriate cost estimates for most recommendations

Issue Number 1 2012

Page 27 of 61




Issue Number 1 2012

Page 28 of 61


APPENDIX 1 IGC3 – THE HEALTH AND SAFETY PRACTICAL APPLICATION CANDIDATE AND COURSE PROVIDER DECLARATIONS:

For completion by the candidate: I declare that the work submitted for this practical application assessment i.e.. the completed observation sheets and the report to management, is my own work. I recognise that contravention of this statement constitutes malpractice and may result in my being subject to the penalties set out in the NEBOSH Malpractice policy. Name (Print):

_______________________________

Signature:

_______________________________

Date:

_______________________________

For completion by a course provider representative (e.g. internal practical assessor): I declare that the work marked is identical to that received from the candidate. I recognise that contravention of this statement constitutes malpractice and may result in my being subject to the penalties set out in the NEBOSH Malpractice policy. Name (Print):

_______________________________

Signature:

_______________________________

Date:

_______________________________

For completion by the course provider’s internal practical assessor: I declare that I have marked this work and am both qualified and approved by NEBOSH to do so. I recognise that contravention of this statement constitutes malpractice and may result in my being subject to the penalties set out in the NEBOSH Malpractice policy. Name (Print):

_______________________________

Signature:

_______________________________

Date:

_______________________________

NB: This declaration must be completed in full, submitted and retained with the candidate’s script. If this declaration is not submitted the candidate’s result may be declared void..


Issue Number 1 2012

Page 29 of 61




Issue Number 1 2012

Page 30 of 61


APPENDIX 2 – OBSERVATION EXERCISES From time to time candidates on the NEBOSH IGC course request some pictorial exercises so that they may prepare themselves for the IGC 3 – Practical Assessment. What follows are a range of photographs (some staged – some not) of workplace situations which as candidates you may find useful to sharpen your skills. To assist also, there are following pictorials that have a large range of faults identified for each example. To follow on from the pictorial representation of faults identified there is a table provided that lists the faults, the same table having two further columns, one for you to enter what remedial action would be required and the other to identify likely breaches of legislation – and here you are advised to indicate why the legislation is being breached.


Issue Number 1 2012

Page 31 of 61




Issue Number 1 2012

Page 32 of 61



Issue Number 1 2012

Page 33 of 61



Issue Number 1 2012

Page 34 of 61


PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED PROBLEM

1.

Obstructed Fire Exit

2.

Bolted Door

3.

Taped Over Switch

4.

Extinguishers Too High

5.

Fire Point Obstructed

6.

Access To Blanket Difficult

7.

Bench Grinder Guard Dirty

8.

No Flash Back Arrester

9.

Jubilee Clip not Proprietary Hose Clamp

REMEDIAL ACTION

LIKELY BREACHES OF INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS

10. Item Leaning on Pedestal Grinder


Issue Number 1 2012

Page 35 of 61


PROBLEM

REMEDIAL ACTION


11. Wire Going Across Wheel of Grinder

12. Overhanging items on Desk

13. Open HFL Container

14. Unstable Storage on Bench

15. Welding Set Pipe Routing

16. PPE Left in Open on Welding Set


Issue Number 1 2012

Page 36 of 61



Issue Number 1 2012

Page 37 of 61



Issue Number 1 2012

Page 38 of 61



1.

Overhanging Item on Booth

2.

PPE Not Being Worn by Grinder

3.

Overhanging Item in Bin

4.

Item on Floor – Base of Bin

5.

Fabrication in Marked Gangway

6.

Trailing Cable

7.

Mat Rucked / Curled Up

8.

Damage Waste Bin Base - Unstable

9.

Item Leaning on Extinguisher

REMEDIAL ACTION


10. Extinguisher on Floor


Issue Number 1 2012

Page 39 of 61


PROBLEM

REMEDIAL ACTION


11. Pipe Fitting on Wall – Sticking Out

12. Coiled Wire on Floor

13. Swarf on Floor

14. Cloth Item on Top of Pedestal Drilling Machine

15. Work-piece Being Held In Hand


Issue Number 1 2012

Page 40 of 61



Issue Number 1 2012

Page 41 of 61



Issue Number 1 2012

Page 42 of 61



1.

Generally untidy area

2.

Smoking in presence of HFL’s

3.

Un-identified drum in which decanting

4.

Drinking in area where hazardous substances are stored / used

5.

Overflowing bins

6.

Bins not being used for intended purpose

7.

Unaddressed liquid spillages on the floor

8.

Lack of PPE

9.

Extinguisher not evident

REMEDIAL ACTION


10. Housekeeping very poor


Issue Number 1 2012

Page 43 of 61


PROBLEM

REMEDIAL ACTION


11. Inappropriate door security (rope)

12. Lack of any safe system of work

13. Inappropriate management controls

14. Assume lack of controls ref bin cleaning

15. Combustible items stored outside doors


Issue Number 1 2012

Page 44 of 61



Issue Number 1 2012

Page 45 of 61



Issue Number 1 2012

Page 46 of 61



1.

Glare / reflection on screen

2.

Badly congested workplace

3.

Inappropriate working posture

4.

Desk – items in risk of falling off

5.

Drinking cup on desk – may be part full

6.

Item leaning against rear of chair

7.

Poor cable management


REMEDIAL ACTION


Issue Number 1 2012

Page 47 of 61


PROBLEM

8.

Tripping hazard from trailing wire and pen etc.

9.

Tripping hazard – multi-gang adapter

REMEDIAL ACTION


10. Damaged equipment although labelled should be removed from workplace


Issue Number 1 2012

Page 48 of 61



Issue Number 1 2012

Page 49 of 61



Issue Number 1 2012

Page 50 of 61



1.

Over reaching to access equipment

2.

Smoking in the workplace

3.

Document hiding a container label

4.

Poor working posture on a step ladder

5.

Machine does not appear to be isolated (panel)

6.

Item could fall from top of the tank

7.

Plank being used as a shelf

8.

Coiled wire to rear of steps (floor)

9.

Spillage not addressed

REMEDIAL ACTION


10. Cable joint in spilt liquid


Issue Number 1 2012

Page 51 of 61


PROBLEM

REMEDIAL ACTION


11. Items littering the floor

12. Trailing cables on the floor

13. General lighting appears to be off

14. Ladder may be on a trailing cable therefore making the ladder unstable and a risk of damaging the cable which could lead to electrocution 15. No PPE being worn (may be a requirement)

16. Lack of a safe system of work

17. Lack of workplace management


Issue Number 1 2012

Page 52 of 61



Issue Number 1 2012

Page 53 of 61



Issue Number 1 2012

Page 54 of 61



1.

Extinguisher access obstructed (maybe)

2.

Upturned guard on the floor

3.

Wet (may be oil) on the floor

4.

Litter / trash on the floor

5.

Machine part on the floor

6.

Equipment on the floor

7.

Cardboard mat

8.

Obstructed work area


REMEDIAL ACTION


Issue Number 1 2012

Page 55 of 61




Issue Number 1 2012

Page 56 of 61


APPENDIX 3 – SOME GENERAL HAZARD SPOTTING PRACTICE PICTURES What follows are a few pictures and/or cartoons that will allow you a little more practice.


Issue Number 1 2012

Page 57 of 61



Issue Number 1 2012

Page 58 of 61



Issue Number 1 2012

Page 59 of 61



Issue Number 1 2012

Page 60 of 61



Issue Number 1 2012

Page 61 of 61

New Igc 3 Jan 2012 v2 = New New New

Recommend Documents