SERVQUAL Analysis of KFC BangladeshFull description
Full description
Full description
A model for ServqualFull description
Full description
Full description
Full description
Descripción completa
Hospital Service Quality measuremenr questionnaireFull description
journal paperFull description
Full description
kuesionerFull description
Full description
Deskripsi lengkap
Model Hilda Taba, Grass Root, Tyler, Wheeler, Administrative, da DemonstrasiFull description
The Basis of the Servqual Model
The Gaps The Key Service Dimensions Causes & Solutions to Gaps
The Make-up of Servqual P S A G
Q U E S T TI O O N N A
E S R C O S P - E
I R R E S DIMENSIONS
G S N I T G H I E W
What are the Servqual Gaps?
Gap 1: The difference between management perceptions of what customers expect and what customers really do expect
Gap 2: The difference between management perceptions and service quality specifications the standards gap
What are the Servqual Gaps?
Gap 3: The difference between service quality specifications and actual service delivery - are standards consistently met?
Gap 4: The difference between service delivery and what is communicated externally - are promises made consistently fulfilled?
What are the Servqual Gaps?
Gap 5: The difference between what customers expect of a service and what they actually receive –
expectations are made up of past experience, wordof-mouth and needs/wants of customers
–
measurement is on the basis of two sets of statements in groups according to the five key service dimensions
The Five Key Service Dimensions
TANGIBLES - the appearance of physical facilities, equipment, personnel and information material
RELIABILITY - the ability to perform the service accurately and dependably
RESPONSIVENESS - the willingness to help RESPONSIVENESS customers and provide a prompt service
The Five Key Service Dimensions
ASSURANCE - a combination of the following –
Competence - having the requisite skills and knowledge
–
Courtesy - politeness, respect, consideration and friendliness friendline ss of contact staff
–
Credibility - trustworthiness, believabi Credibility believability lity and honesty of staff
–
Security - freedom from danger, risk or doubt
The Five Key Service Dimensions
EMPATHY - a combination of the following: –
Access (physical and social) - approachabil approachability ity and ease of contact
–
Communication - keeping customers informed in a Communication language they understand and really listening to them
–
Understanding the customer - making the effort to get to know customers and their specific needs
Conceptual Model of Service Quality CUSTOMER Word-of-mouth Communications
Personal Needs
Past experience
Expected Service Gap 5 Perceived Service
PROVIDER
Service Delivery
Gap 4
Gap 3 Gap 1
Service Quality Specs Gap 2 Management Perceptions of
External Communications To Customers
Reasons for the Gaps GAP GA P1
Not kn know owin ing g wha whatt cus custom tomer ers s ex expe pect ct
GAP GA P2
The wr wrong ong se serv rvic ice e qua qualit lity y sta stand ndar ards ds
GAP GA P3
The Th e ser servi vice ce pe perf rfor orma manc nce e gap gap
GAP GA P4
When Wh en pro promi mise ses s do no nott matc match h actua actuall deliv deliver ery y
GAP 5
The diffe differen rence ce betw betwee een n custom customer er perc percept eption ion and and expe expecta ctation tion
Reasons for the Gaps
GAP 1 - not knowing what customers expect –
lack of a marketing orientation
–
inadequate upward communication communication (from contact staff to management)
–
too many levels of management
Reasons for the Gaps
GAP 2 - the wrong service quality standards –
inadequate commitment commitment to service quality
–
lack of perception of feasibility - ‘it cannot be done’
–
inadequate task standardisation
–
the absence of goal setting
Reasons for the Gaps
GAP 2 - the wrong service quality standards –
inadequate commitment commitment to service quality
–
lack of perception of feasibility - ‘it cannot be done’
–
inadequate task standardisation
–
the absence of goal setting
Reasons for the Gaps
GAP 3 - the service performance gap –
role ambiguity and role conflict - unsure of what your remit is and how it fits with others
–
poor employee or technology fit - the wrong person or system for the job
–
inappropriate supervisory supervisory control or lack of perceived control - too much or too little control
–
lack of teamwork
Reasons for the Gaps
GAP 4 - when promises pr omises made do not match actual delivery –
inadequate horizontal communication - between departments or services
–
a propensity to overpromise
Servqual Data - How Useful is it?
We can assess service quality from the customer’s perspective
We can track customer expectations and perceptions over time and the discrepancies between them
We can compare a set of Servqual scores against those of competitors or best practice examples
Servqual Data - How Useful is it?
We can compare the expectations and perceptions of different customer groups - this is particularly useful in the public sector
We can assess the expectations and perceptions of internal customers - eg other departments or services we deal with
Servqual Data - What can we do with it? We can use data on customer priorities to feed into the House of Quality (QFD) Quality function deployment (QFD) is a “method to transform user demands into design quality, to deploy the functions forming quality, and to deploy methods for achieving the design quality into subsystems and component parts, and ultimately to specific elements of the manufacturing process.”
Customer priorities and their ranked order of importance can become the WHATS
These WHATS can then be compared with the HOWS (key business processes) and relationships matched to check service design and provision according to key requirements
conclusion
Just as the servqual model is extensively used to assess external service quality ,the instrument can can also be modified to assess the quality of the internal service provided by departments and divisions within a company to employees in other departments and division.