STRATEGIES FOR TEACHING WRITING SKILLS IN LARGE ESL CLASSES
BY SHOLA TIMOTHY BABATUNDE ABSTRACT Changing trends and shifting perspectives in the world continue to exert unmistakable influence on the language classroom. Precisely, the renewed concern for the communicative tasks learners actually need language for continue to call for a progressive re-examination of matters relating to language teaching teaching and learning. Ultimately, Ultimately, there is now a tr ansformation of the language classroom from a dull, one-way traffic to an interactive and in teresting enterprise. This paper takes an informed look at the 'USE' writing classroom where the teachers are called upon to cope with extra-large classes and at the same time ensure that the writing skills are effectively taught. The paper thus proposes a teaching strategy that effectively and systematically takes learners through the stages involved in the teaching and learning of writing .
INTRODUCTION Shifting perspectives in the practice of language teaching has continued to emphasize the need for the teachers to always consider what the learners would subsequently use language for. Thus, language teaching is exposing learners to language use by inculcating in them the ability to use language effectively to meaningfully express their feelings and understanding of the world. This consideration for learners' use of language informs the emphasis on the teaching of communicative competence. Communicative competence is thus being taught to enhance communicative performance. In spite of the intractable issue of defining what communicative competence is, there appears to be a concensus that communicative language teaching involves inculcating such relevant skills in the learner that will make him use language effectively in a
meaningful, communicative situation. Rea (1978) puts it as the ability to communicate with ease and effect in specified sociolinguistic settings. Thus, performance appears to be the aim or goal of the Use of Language teaching. In this regard, the use of English (USE) teaching will not just be teaching language as a vehicle for the expression of functional meaning, but also as a vehicle for the performance of academic, occupational and social functions. Following this perception, one realises that the teaching of language skills should not just be a dull, one-way traffic in which the teacher demonstrates his knowledge of language and his rhetorical skills; rather it should be an interactive and pragmatic process, which will give students the opportunity to use English language in the classroom. Students should be actively involved in the teaching process.
THE PROBLEM The ideal situation for an effective teaching of the Use of English in the higher Institutions in Nigeria is to have classes of between 20 - 30 students, but this is a far cry from reality. In most of the use of English classes in the institutions in Nigeria, we have between 50 to 350 students. How does a teacher then handle such a class to achieve the effective teaching of writing skills?; and, effective teaching is having an interactive teaching and learning situation, achieving effective practice of writing sub-skills, and evaluating learner's progress and achievement effectively. Researchers in the area of large language classes have outlined some of the following suggestions (e.g. Coleman, 1987, Nolasco and Arthur, 1988) —
Dividing the group into sub-groups.
—
Encouraging group cohesion by providing opportunities for frequent interaction, etc.
—
Encouraging intergroup competitions.
—
Giving group assignments presentations; etc.
and
encouraging
organized
group
Insightful as the suggestions are, the present writer still feels that specific suggestions could be given for the teaching of writing skills. As such the problem this paper intends to look into is how maximum efficiency and effectiveness could be achieved in the teaching of writing skills to large groups.
WRITING SKILLS: Nature and Scope
Writing, according to Russo (1987:183). is "an interactive experience." It is a productive skill in language use in which the writer attempts to concretize his perception and understanding of the world. Through writing we verbalise our apprehension of reality and the place of man in the scheme of things. The writer is thus playing a mediating role between objective reality and the rest of mankind that make up the audience. Through what has been written, the audience also has an interesting insight into the personality of the writer and his perception of the world. Writing is seen as a process, and studies in the area have revealed that four main activities are involved in the writing process. For instance, studies carried out by Adegbija (1989) among others, reveal the following categories of activities (a)
Pre-writing
(b)
Writing
(c)
Post-writing
(d)
Rewriting.
A good writing course should take the students through all these processes systematically, and this has a lot of implications for the teacher. Adegbija (1989) emphasises the fact that the interesting activities earned out in the classroom which make learners to be personally involved, will not only stimulate the interest of students in writing, but will also arouse their awareness into the what and how of communicating in writing, especially if 'the classroom activities are made relevant to the specific disciplines of the students. Hedge's (1988) Resource Book actually corroborates this. Hedge (1988: 5) proposes the following as the basic requirements of effective writing: a high degree of organization in the development of ideas and information; a high degree of accuracy so that there is no ambiguity of meaning: the use of complex grammatical devices for focus and emphasis: a careful choice of vocabulary, grammatical patterns, and sentence structures to create a style which is appropriate to the subject matter and the eventual readers. As such, to effectively ascertain students' familiarity with the processes involved in writing and the basic requirements of a good written work, the teacher must personally supervise and assess the exercises given to the students during the use of English lessons. It is not enough to give group exercises and assignments that will be assessed together in the classrooms because, first, much lime is wasted on these assessments in the classrooms; and secondly, class
assessment of essays makes the teacher liable to over-looking some important developmental errors of the learners. This thus underscores the need for the teacher to personally assess the learners' works, so that he may have a direct contact with the essays and personaly assess and evaluate learner's progress. The organisation of the course content should reflect a proper integration of the link between approach and method. Syllabus design has been seen as the level of analysis at which the following are crucial considerations: The method(s) to be used in line with the perceived objectives of the course; The informed flexibility of the analysed needs of learners; Insights provided by linguistics, especially as regards the content of language; The duration of the course Salient pedagogical considerations like classroom activities: teacher-learner roles and interactions: instructional materials, etc. Considering the above, it is advised that the 'USH'/EAP (English for Academic Purposes) teacher should organise his course to suit the specific context and the variables in operation in that context. I should think, however. that course delivery should be made an interactive and integrative process in which learners actually practise the writing skills in the classroom. In addition, whatever emphasis would be placed on each category of the activities in the classroom depends on the perceived needs of the specific learners involved. It is also pertinent for us to emphasize here that an English writing course should be seen as a continuous progression. This should be borne in mind when scheming and grading the course content. This perception should also inform course delivery by making it a systematic exposure of learners to the various stages of the writing process. The practical considerations in this paper are predicated upon this view of the writing course: that is. writing is a continuous process requiring a practical and systematic teaching. The foregoing practical suggestions are a product of years of teaching writing skills to 'USE' students at the University of llorin.
PRACTICAL SUGGESTIONS As mentioned above, we are here advocating for a method of teaching writing that systematically exposes learners to the various stages involved in the writing process and also effectively tests learners as the course progresses. Again, a writing course should essentially be a practical one in which learners are progressively made to perform writing skills. It will be impossible for
a teacher who has a minimum of eight to ten groups each containing about 60 to 100 students, to give a writing assignment or test each week and return same after grading before the next class so that the errors could be discussed in the classroom. We shall hence illustrate our method using a typical writing course for Economics and Business Administration students. The teaching aid to be used is the table in the Appendix.
STEPS Sensitize learners to the writing needs of Economics and Business Administration. Students could be asked to discuss their writing tasks. The various contributions could then be properly moderated and straightened up b> the teacher later. The motivation for this approach is that in tertiary institutions we are dealing with more matured students who are likely to be positively motivated if they are made aware of what the expected expertise is in teaching and learning the writings course. This can be effectively discussed during a one-hour lesson During the next lesson, the table in the Appendix could be given to the learners. They could be asked to discuss the content in groups of three to five, for about two minutes. Each group would then be asked to give the oral presentation of their discussions. This should take about ten minutes depending on the size of the class. Next, the groups can now be enlarged to contain between 5 and 8 members each, to allow for a broader perspective in facing the next task. After the students have been asked to do an unguided brainstorming. a set of leading questions on the table could be made available to the class. For instance, on the table under consideration such hints as the following could be given; outline the types of information supplied by the table; evaluate the influence of colonialism on the economic products and trading relations; examine the prospects of these countries in the near future; what aspects of the information contained in the table are not relevant in writing a good essay on the table?; suggest a suitable title for the table, etc. This could go on for the rest of the time for that period; and at the end each of the groups will give a report of their discussion in the form of an outline. This report will be collected for assessment. This lesson has been devoted to collecting information for an essay to be written. At the beginning, information collection does not have to be orderly to
give room for a free flow of ideas. The next lesson could then be devoted to organising our points according to relative importance and relevance. The previous classwork would have been assessed by now. It would then be given to the groups to work on. The class could be given a topic which is an appropriate choice from al! the suggested titles in the previous lesson. They would then write a good outline using the previous classwork as the source of information. Two copies of this outline can be produced by each group The teacher would collect a copy, while the second copy remains with the group. The teacher could then call on any member of the group to give oral justification for the outline done by the group. Apart from encouraging interactive and integrated language teaching, this step will ensure that everybody participates actively in group works. During the next lesson, a different material could be given to the class to work on. to allow for diversification and avoid monotony. The processes above on information collection could be repeated, but this time it may be faster. After this stage, each student could be asked to write a paragraph, which is supposed to be part of the body of the essay on any of the outlined points. This is to teach paragraph development. The paragraph should follow a prescribed length, say about 50 words. This would be collected and assesses by the teacher. The next lesson could be devoted to discussing some of the shortcomings discovered in the assessed works. During this discussion emphasis would be placed on the qualities of a good paragraph, e.g. unity, coherence, completeness, emphasis etc. After this practical teaching, another exercise similar to the pre-teaching test could be given to the students. It could equally be collected for assessment. The process above would be used for every stage of the teaching. For instance, in teaching the writing of introduction, an exercise could first of all be given. From here, a good introduction could be taught from the background of a bad introduction. In this lesson, such salient aspects of introduction like statement of discourse and topic sentence could be taught. At the end of the course, it would be discovered that so much has been done, and the learners would have been made involved in the practical teaching of writing skills. The systematic exposure of learners to the various aspects of writing through practice does not rule out die need for writing a complete essay. Indeed, we are suggesting that towards the end of the course, an exercise should be given to the learners which will help them write a continuous prose, in which they will further demonstrate their competence of the skills required for writing good essays-skills they are expected to have acquired in the process of course
delivery. (Hedge, 1988:5).
CONCLUDING REMARKS The above approach has a number of advantages which include the following: The language teaching class becomes a lively class in which effective interaction is enhanced among the students, and between the students and the teacher. The goal of language teaching, that is, communicative competence, is achieved through constant class participation and practice. The language teacher is able to monitor the development of his students through effective and efficient assessment of the regular exercises given. Communicative skills are presented in an integrative manner, though the emphasis appears to be the teaching of writing skills. As seen in this approach, students are encouraged to read a given material, they will discuss it among themselves, a summary of the discussion will be presented orally to the whole class, while the presenter speaks, others will learn to listen effectively, and finally, students will be asked to do the actual writing task. Teachers using this approach will, however, have to make sure that the subgroups are not too large for effective monitoring, and to also ensure that all the members of the sub-groups are participating effectively. In addition, giving short but relevant group assignments will simplify the task of having to sit down for a long time to assess students' regular essays. Teachers should equally change the sub-groups constantly to ensure effective interaction among the members of the class. If members stay too long within a specific group it becomes monotonous and effective participating of all may dwindle. In all an effective (language) teacher is one who is a master of teaching skills and is able to adjust his approach and method to suit the needs of his students.
REFERENCES Adegbija, E.E. "Pre-writing Activities in English for Academic Purpose (EAP) in Nigerian Universities" Paper presented at the University of Ilorin Communication Skills Project (COMSKIP) workshop, 6th September, 1989. Coleman, H. (1987) "Teaching spectacles and learning festivals" ELT Journal vol. 41.2.
pp. 97-103. Freedman, A. et al (edited). 1988. Learning to Write: First Language/Second Language. London and New York: Longman. Hedge, Tricia (1988). Writing: Resource Books for Teachers Series. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Jordan, R.R. (1980). Academic Writing Course. London and Glasgow: Collins. Nolasco, R. and Arthur, L. (1988) Large Classes: London and Basingstoke: Macmillan. Russo, G.M. (1987) "Writing: an interactive experience" in Interactive Language Teaching ed. Rivers W.M. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press. Sheal, Peter (1981). Advanced Level Writing Skills for Colleges and Universities in Africa. Essex, U.K : Longman.
APPENDIX: TRADING RELATIONS IN PERCENTAGE FRANCE U.K
U.S.A
CANADA
JAPAN
GERMANY
OTHER
NIGERIA
15
30
20
5
5
10
15
GHANA
10
40
15
5
8
10
12
IVORY COAST
35
25
15
4
6
8
7
TOGO
30
25
18
6
4
7
10
GAMBIA
31
26
13
4
7
4
15
SENEGAL
33
15
20
3
5
10
14
LEONE
10
23
35
4
8
10
10
MALI
34
15
12
2
7
8
15
NIGER
36
13
14
3
10
8
18
BENIN
30
15
20
2
10
20
3
LIBERIA
10
30
25
5
6
9
15
SIERRA
REPUBLIC OF