STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS REPORT ON REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDING
OWNER: Kamala Timilsina Bharatpur-12 Submitted By:
Submitted To:
Sahara Engineering Solution
Bharatpur Sub-Metropolitan
Bharatpur-10, Chitwan
Chitwan, Nepal
March 2016
CERTIFICATION This Certificate is submitted with reference to the detail structural design of multi storied building of the following detail. Owner : Kamala Timilsina Address : Bharatpur-12 No. of Storey : G+2 Size of Column : (14"x14") and (12"x12") Size of Beam : (9"x16") Concrete Grade : M20 Rebar : Fe 415 Other details are attached in the design documents. All the designs are done as per the design criteria specified in NBC 000:1994 to 114:1994, NBC 205:2012, IS 456:2000, IS:875 and relevant other Indian design codes. The referenced calculations were prepared by us / under our supervision and comply with all applicable structural provisions of the Construction Codes. We hereby certify that the design is structurally adequate and economic. However, during construction the use of construction materials and workmanship is to be carried out under the supervision of qualified and certified technical person. The designer is not responsible for the violence of the specifications provided.
Analysed By :
Checked By :
Er. Suraj Khatiwada NEC No. 6268 CIVIL 'A' +977-9843069923
Er. Ashim Adhikari NEC No. 7464 CIVIL 'A'
On behalf of : Sahara Engineering Solution Bharatpur-10, Chitwan
(Structure Engineer) +977-9841547347
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS REPORT ON REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDING
CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 DESIGN PHILOSOPHY 3.0 LOADING AND LOAD COMBINATIONS 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4
DEAD LOAD AND SIDL LIVE LOADS SEISMIC LOAD LOAD COMBINATIONS
4.0 ANALYSIS OF THE STRUCTURE 4.1 LOAD CALCULATIOS 4.2 SKETCHES SHOWING THE MODEL 5.0 DESIGN OF TYPICAL COLUMNS & FOOTINGS 6.0 DESIGN OF SLAB 7.0 DESIGN OF BEAM 8.0 DESIGN OF STAIR 9.0 LIST OF DESIGN CODES AND STANDARDS 10.0 RESULT SUMMARY 11.0 DESIGN SPECIFICATION
1.0 INTRODUCTION The analysed proposed reinforced concrete framed structure consists of
G+2
Storey
The structural system chosen is Moment Resisting RCC Frames. Columns and beams have been laid out in plan in coordination with architectural and services planning that acts jointly support and transmit to the ground those forces arising from earthquake motions, gravity and live load. The structure is designed by carrying out the space frame analysis. A three dimensional mathematical model of the physical structure represents the spatial distribution of the mass and stiffness of the structure. Thus, the essential requirements for the analytical model are the conclusion of sufficient details of geometry, material, loading and support such that it reflects the near true behavior of the physical structure for the structural modelling of the present building SAP 2000 V-14 software was used. The analysed structure is found to be safe against the all the load combinations and designed for the governing load combination. The load combinations considered for the designing of structure using limit state method are listed in this report. M20 grade concrete is used for different RC members of super-structure and sub structure. The steel grade for all the structural elements is Fe415
1
2.0 DESIGN PHILOSOPHY
The Design of the total structure is based on the Limit State method of design as envisaged in Nepal National Building Codes (NBC) and Indian Standard codes of practice. Structure is designed for Dead loads, Imposed loads (floor finishes), service loads, taking into consideration of the relevant codes and load combination specified in the codes.
The structure is designed using individual footings under the columns designed for a safe bearing of 175KN/m2. The Strata is in general stiff clay having the above strength and is available at most of the places at a depth of 2.0m below naturural ground level. In case such strata is not available at this depth, foundations are taken deeper to required strata.
2
3.0 LOADINGS AND LOAD COMBINATIONS 3.1 DEAD LOAD AND SIDL 3.1.1 Dead Load is the self weight of the slab. Self weight of 110 mm thick slab
=
0.110
x =
25.00 2.750
KN/m2
a) From 1st floor level to 3rd floor level Floor Finishes
=
1.00
KN/m2
b) Roof level Floor Finishes
=
1.00
KN/m2
a) From 1st floor level to 3rd floor level Live Load in rooms Live Load in Balconies & Corridors
= =
2.00 3.00
KN/m2 KN/m2
b) Roof level Live Load (accessible) Live Load (Non-accessible)
= =
1.50 1.00
KN/m2 KN/m2
=
3.00
KN/m2
3.1.2 SIDL (Super Imposd Dead Load)
3.2 LIVE LOADS
c) Stair Live Load
3.3 SEISMIC LOAD 3.3.1 Seismic Coefficient Method Nepal National Building Code NBC105:1994 contains provisions for both the static analysis and the dynamic analysis of buildings. Static analysis using equivalent lateral force procedure is restricted to regular buildings having height up to 40 m. At the core of seismic analysis is the use of response spectra plot as given in figure 8.1 of NBC 105:1994, in which the spectral acceleration is plotted for Wide range of fundamental natural period of the structures. For the static analysis, the static forces in the structure are derived from the design seismic base shear (V) given by; Horizontal seismic base shear, V=Cd*Wt Where, Cd Wt
= Design Horizontal Seismic Coefficient = Seismic Weight of the building
3
Design Horizontal Seismic Coefficient Cd = CZIK Where, C = Basic seismic coefficient as per figure 8.1, NBC 105:1994 Z = Seismic zoning factor, figure 8.2 I = Importance factor for the buildings, table 8.1 K = Structural performance factor, table 8.2 Determining seismic Load based on NBC 105:1994 Seismic zoning factor, Z Importance factor, I Structural Performance Factor, K Height of the Building Dimension of the building along X, Dx Dimension of the building along Y, Dy Time preiod of the building along X, Tx Time preiod of the building along Y, Ty Soil Type Basic Seismic coefficient along X, C Basic Seismic coefficient along Y, C Design Horizontal Seismic Coefficient, Cd Seismic Weight of the Building (DL+0.25LL) Base Shear Distribution of Lateral Forces along different Storey Storey Storey Wi Height (Hi) Level Stair Cover 12.80 135.23 1025.44 9.60 3rd floor 1554.59 6.40 2nd floor st 3.20 1405.18 1 floor Total 4120.44
= = = = = = = = = = = = = =
0.99 1.00 1.00 12.80m 8.84m 13.72m 0.39 sec 0.31 sec II 0.08 0.08 0.08 4120.44 326.34
Wi*Hi
Fi=V*(WiHi/∑WiHi)
1730.89 9844.22 9949.38 4496.59 26021.08
21.71 123.46 124.78 56.39 326.34
3.4 LOAD COMBINATIONS The analysis & designs are done for the following load combinations using limit state method. S.NO
Load Comb
Description
1)
Comb 1
1.0 (Dead Load) + 1.3 (Live Load) + 1.25 (Eqx)
2)
Comb 2
1.0 (Dead Load) + 1.3 (Live Load) - 1.25 (Eqx)
3)
Comb 3
1.0 (Dead Load) + 1.3 (Live Load) + 1.25 (Eqy)
4)
Comb 4
1.0 (Dead Load) + 1.3 (Live Load) - 1.25 (Eqy)
4
5)
Comb 5
0.9 (Dead Load) + 1.25 (Eqx)
6)
Comb 6
0.9 (Dead Load) - 1.25 (Eqx)
7)
Comb 7
0.9 (Dead Load) + 1.25 (Eqy)
8)
Comb 8
0.9 (Dead Load) - 1.25 (Eqy)
9)
Comb 9
1.0 (Dead Load) + 1.3 (SL) + 1.25 (Eqx)
10 )
Comb 10
1.0 (Dead Load) + 1.3 (SL) - 1.25 (Eqx)
11 )
Comb 11
1.0 (Dead Load) + 1.3 (SL) + 1.25 (Eqy)
12 )
Comb 12
1.0 (Dead Load) + 1.3 (SL) - 1.25 (Eqy)
13 )
S. WT
1.0 ( Dead Load ) + 0.25 (Live Load)
Note: SL S. WT Dead Load
= = =
Snow Load (Not Considered) Seismic Weight Selfweight of the structure + SIDL
5
4.0 ANALYSIS OF THE STRUCTURE 4.1 LOAD CALCULATIONS
a) At Ground Floor level 230 mm thick brick wall load
= x
0.23 20
x =
3.20 14.72
x KN/m
x
0.115 20
x =
3.20 7.36
x KN/m
Live Load in rooms Live Load in Balconies & Corridors
= =
2.00 3.00
KN/m2 KN/m2
b) At 1st to 3rd floor level Dead load = Self weight of the Slab + SIDL = 2.750 + 1.00
=
3.75
KN/m2
115mm thick brick wall load
=
115 mm thick brick wall load
=
115mm thick brick wall load
x
0.12 20
x =
3.20 7.36
x KN/m
x
0.115 20
x =
3.20 7.36
x KN/m
= =
2.00 3.00
KN/m2 KN/m2
= = =
3.75 1.50 1.00
KN/m2 KN/m2 KN/m2
x =
1.00 2.30
x KN/m
=
Live Load in rooms Live Load in Balconies & Corridors c) Roof level Dead load
= Self weight of the Slab + SIDL = 2.750 + 1.00 Live Load (accessible) Live Load (Non-accessible) = (considering 1000mm height)
x
0.115 20
For analysys of the structure,. The height of the structure is as per the approved architectural drawings. The total building height above ground level is 12.8 m and below ground level is considered 2.0m The floor heights are as follows.
6
3.200
Stair Cover
3.200
Second floor
12.8m 3.200
First floor
3.200
Ground floor
The sketches showing the model created for the analysis are shown in the following pages.
7
4.2 SKETCHES SHOWING THE MODEL 4.2.1 3D Model
8
4.2.2 Column Joint Label
9
4.2.3 Deformed Shape
10
4.2.4 Axial Force Diagram
0.00
11
4.2.5 Moment Diagram
12
5.0 DESIGN OF COLUMNS AND FOOTINGS 5.1 DESIGN OF COLUMN AND FOOTING 5.1.1 Design of Column (C1) - 79, 80, 83, 84 Ground Floor Only(From SAP) Size of the Column
(
350
x
350
) mm
M 20 Fy 415
Checking the slenderness of the column Length of column,
L
Effective length of column
=
3.200
m
= =
0.707 2.262
m
Effective lenth of column / least lateral dimension
x =
From the SAP results,
L 2.262 / 0.35 6.5 < 12 Hence this is Short column
The governing condition for the design of column and footing is the case 3 Pu My Mz
= = =
Therefore for design, Pu = Mu
= =
875 KN 81.42 KNm 42.88 KNm 875
KN ,
Sqrt ( My2 + Mz2) KNm 92
Minimum moment due to minimum eccentricity of column is Min. Mu = 0.020 x 875.20 Pu fck.B.D
= =
Mu fck.B.D2
=
20
875 x
x 350
92.02 x
x 350
=
0.14
= x
17.50 KNm 10
3
10
6
350
0.357
20
=
0.1073
d' D
=
50 350
p fck
=
0.081
13
x
350
2
p
=
0.081
Ac
=
122500
=
1.62
Ast- req
Minimum % of reinforcement
Provide
=
4 nos.
x
20
=
x 100
122500
=
x
122500
mm2
0.8/100 980
mm2
Tor 20
= =
2 1985 mm
+
Ast Provided Maximum % of reinforcement
1.62 %
4/100 4900
4 nos. 2 2061 mm )
(= mm2
x
Tor 16
122500
Reinforcement Provided for the section is more than mimimum and less than maximum Hence safe Diameter of lateral Ties Dia. of tie not less than
5
Spacing of ties required
=
Provide
Tor -
8
mm,
Provide
256 links
Tor -
8
mm
mm
@
150
c/c
Check for minimum eccentricity In the direction of longer dimension e-min =
2262.4 500
e-min / lateral dimension
+ =
350 30
=
16.2
0.046
<
0.05
mm
Check for minimum eccentricity In the direction of shorter dimension e-min =
2262.4 500
e-min / lateral dimension
+ =
350 30
=
16.2
0.046
<
0.05
mm
Hence the following formula can be used for calculating load carrying capacity of the column Pu
= =
(
0.4 + 1553 KN
x 0.67
20 x
x 415
>
1.000 x 875 KN
14
x 2061 Hence safe
122500 )
5.1.2 Design of Footing The governing condition for the design of footing is the case 3
M 20 Fy 415
For the above case, Pu =
875
P
=
875 1.5
=
M
=
92 1.5
=
Mu
=
0.020
=
92.02 1.5
=
S.B.C
=
175
Footing area
=
583.5
Min. M
kN
Mu =
Providing footing size Size of the column
kNm
583.5 KN 61 KNm x
875
=
KN/m2 x 175
1.00
x x
1.89 0.35
14 no.s Tor -
m m
583.5 1.89 x 1.89
+
=
163.34
+
10.00
=
173.34
or
153.34
350
12
14 no. s Tor-
1890
B L
= =
1890 1890
d
=
425
-
50
=
357
61.35 1.89
<
x x
S.B.C of Soil
-
15
12
x
1.1 1.89
=
mm mm
mm
2 3.57 m )
(
100 =
2 3.33 m
=
100
Pressure from soil
18 KNm
61.35 KNm
1.89 0.35
425
92
12
1890
100
2
2
175 KN/m Hence Safe
-
12 2
In Long Span Direction Max. BM
=
173.34
=
97
Check for Depth dreq
= sqrt. {
=
(
Ast
=
KNm
1.5 0.133
x x
170 mm
2
97 20
<
1.5
x 1890
=
0.77 2
x
1.89
( Bending Moment Consideration)
= Mu/bd2
x
x x
1.00E+06 ) } 1890
357 mm
97.12 x
x
1890
x
357
Hence Safe 10
2
6
0.60 0.20 100
x
357 2 1370 mm
= Provide
14
nos. Tor -
12
=
173.34
x
=
97
2
( =
1583 mm )
In Short Span Direction Max. BM
Check for Depth dreq
= sqrt. {
=
(
1.5 0.133
170 mm 1.5
Ast
=
x x
97 20
< x
1890 =
KNm
2
x
1.89
( Bending Moment Consideration)
= Mu/bd2
0.77 2
x x
1.00E+06 ) } 1890
357 mm
97.12 x
x
1890
x
357
Hence Safe 10
2
0.60 0.20 100
x
357 =
Provide
6
14
nos. Tor -
12
( =
16
2 1370 mm 2
1583 mm )
( Transverse shear check) 1890
Check for One Way Shear Critical Section is at 'd' from face of column.
350
357
In Short Span Direction Vu =
1.5 x
Effective depth at critical section =
=
203.0 1890
Percentage of reinforcement
x x = =
Shear Strength of Concrete,
Check for Two Way Shear
1890
413
Overall Depth at critical section
v
350
x 1.89
)
173.34
x
=
(
=
425
425
-
=
357
1.00E+03 357
=
0.301
1583 1890
x x
100 357
0.413 203.0 KN
mm 62
-
mm
12 2
Mpa =
0.235
9.90 c
=
0.350
> 0.301 Safe in shear
Mpa
( Punching Shear Check) 1890
Critical Section is at 'd/2' from face of column/pedestal
707 350 707
17
350
1890
Overall Depth at critical section d
=
425
= Vu
B
v
=
1.5 798.8 KN
=
2
=
2828 mm
=
where, ks
c
mm
-
62
-
12 2
x
173.34
x (
3.57 x
0.71 0.707 )
707
+
707
)
1.00E+03 357
=
x
798.8 2828
c
0.25 =
(
x x
Shear Strength of Concrete, cc
425
357 mm
=
=
=
=
sqrt
ks . (
20
(
0.5
+
350 350
=
1.000
x
1.12
=
1.12
cc
)
0.5
=
>
0.79
0.79 Mpa
= +
Short side of column Long side of column =
Mpa
18
1.12 Mpa
1.50
Hence Safe
>
) 1.0
5.2 DESIGN OF COLUMN AND FOOTING 5.2.1 Design of Column (C2) - 81, 82, 85, 86 (From SAP) Size of the Column
(
300
x
300
) mm
M 20 Fy 415
Checking the slenderness of the column Length of column,
L
Effective length of column
=
3.200
m
= =
0.707 2.26
m
Effective lenth of column / least lateral dimension
x =
From the SAP results,
L 2.26 / 0.3 7.5 < 12 Hence this is Short column
The governing condition for the design of column and footing is the case 4 Pu My Mz
= = =
Therefore for design, Pu = Mu
= =
600.68 KN 25.78 KNm 43.08 KNm 601
KN ,
Sqrt ( My2 + Mz2) KNm 50
Minimum moment due to minimum eccentricity of column is Min. Mu = 0.020 x 600.68 Pu fck.B.D
= =
Mu fck.B.D2
=
20
601 x
x 300
50.21 x
x 300
=
0.15
x
20
= x
12.01 KNm 10
3
10
6
300
0.334
20
=
0.0930
d' D
=
45 300
p fck
=
0.08
p
=
0.080
Ac
=
90000
mm 2
19
2
x
300
=
1.6 %
Ast- req
=
1.6
x 100
=
0.8/100 720
Minimum % of reinforcement
Provide
4 nos.
=
x
90000
mm 2
Tor 16
+
Ast Provided Maximum % of reinforcement
= =
2 1440 mm
90000
4/100 3600
4 nos. 2 1608 mm )
(= mm 2
Tor 16
x
90000
Reinforcement Provided for the section is more than mimimum and less than maximum Hence safe Diameter of lateral Ties Dia. of tie not less than
4
Spacing of ties required
=
Provide
Tor -
8
mm,
Provide
256 links
Tor -
8
mm
mm
@
150 mm
c/c
Check for minimum eccentricity In the direction of longer dimension e-min =
2262.4 500
e-min / lateral dimension
+ =
300 30
=
14.5
0.048
<
0.05
mm
Check for minimum eccentricity In the direction of shorter dimension e-min =
2262.4 500
e-min / lateral dimension
+ =
300 30
=
14.5
0.048
<
0.05
mm
Hence the following formula can be used for calculating load carrying capacity of the column Pu
= =
(
0.4 + 1167 KN
x 0.67
20 x
x 415
>
1.000 x 601 KN
20
x 1608 Hence safe
90000 )
5.2.2 Design of Footing The governing condition for the design of footing is the case 4
M 20 Fy 415
For the above case, Pu =
601
P
=
601 1.5
=
M
=
50 1.5
=
Mu
=
0.020
=
50.21 1.5
=
S.B.C
=
175
Footing area
=
400.5
Min. M
kN
Mu =
Providing footing size Size of the column
kNm
400.5 KN 33 KNm x
601
=
KN/m2 x 175 x x
11 no.s Tor -
1.00 1.60 0.30
m m
400.5 1.6 x 1.6
+
=
156.43
+
8.99
=
165.42
or
147.44
300
12
11 no. s Tor-
1600
B L
= =
1600 1600
d
=
400
-
50
=
332
33.47 1.60
<
x x
S.B.C of Soil
-
21
12
x
1.1 1.60
=
mm mm
mm
2 2.56 m )
(
100 =
2 2.29 m
=
100
Pressure from soil
12 KNm
33 KNm
1.60 0.30
400
50
12
1600
2
2 175 KN/m Hence Safe
-
12 2
100
In Long Span Direction Max. BM
=
165.42
=
56
Check for Depth dreq
= sqrt. {
=
(
Ast
=
KNm
1.5 0.133
x x
140 mm
2
56 20
<
1.5
x 1600
=
0.65 2
x
1.60
( Bending Moment Consideration)
= Mu/bd2
x
x x
1.00E+06 ) } 1600
332 mm
55.91 x
x
1600
x
332
Hence Safe 10
2
6
0.48 0.17 100
x
332 2 914 mm
= Provide
11
nos. Tor -
12
=
165.42
x
=
56
2
( =
1244 mm )
In Short Span Direction Max. BM
Check for Depth dreq
= sqrt. {
=
(
1.5 0.133
140 mm 1.5
Ast
=
x x
56 20
< x
1600 =
KNm
2
x
1.60
( Bending Moment Consideration)
= Mu/bd2
0.65 2
x x
1.00E+06 ) } 1600
332 mm
55.91 x
x
1600
x
332
Hence Safe 10
2
0.48 0.17 100
x
332 =
Provide
6
11
nos. Tor -
12
( =
22
2 914 mm 2
1244 mm )
( Transverse shear check) 1600
Check for One Way Shear Critical Section is at 'd' from face of column.
300
332
In Short Span Direction Vu =
1.5 x
Effective depth at critical section =
=
126.2 1600
Percentage of reinforcement
x x = =
Shear Strength of Concrete,
Check for Two Way Shear
1600
318
Overall Depth at critical section
v
300
x 1.60
)
165.42
x
=
(
=
400
400
-
=
332
1.00E+03 332
=
0.238
1244 1600
x x
100 332
0.318 126.2 KN
mm 62
-
mm
12 2
Mpa
=
0.234
9.92 c
=
0.349
> 0.238 Safe in shear
Mpa
( Punching Shear Check) 1600
Critical Section is at 'd/2' from face of column/pedestal
632 300 632
23
300
1600
Overall Depth at critical section d
=
400
= Vu
B
v
=
1.5 536.1 KN
=
2
=
2528 mm
=
where, k s
c
mm
-
62
-
12 2
x
165.42
x (
2.56 x
0.63 0.632 )
632
+
632
)
1.00E+03 332
=
x
536.1 2528
c
0.25 =
(
x x
Shear Strength of Concrete, cc
400
332 mm
=
=
=
=
sqrt
ks . (
20
(
0.5
+
300 300
=
1.000
x
1.12
=
1.12
cc
)
0.5
=
>
0.64
0.64 Mpa
= +
Short side of column Long side of column =
Mpa
24
1.12 Mpa
1.50
Hence Safe
>
)
1.0
5.3 DESIGN OF COLUMN AND FOOTING 5.3.1 Design of Column (C3) - 75, 76, 77, 78, 87, 88, 89, 90 (From SAP) Size of the Column
(
300
x
300
) mm
M 20 Fy 415
Checking the slenderness of the column Length of column,
L
Effective length of column
=
3.200
m
= =
0.707 2.26
m
Effective lenth of column / least lateral dimension
x =
From the SAP results,
L 2.26 / 0.3 7.5 < 12 Hence this is Short column
The governing condition for the design of column and footing is the case 4 Pu My Mz
= = =
Therefore for design, Pu = Mu
= =
413.12 KN 38.30 KNm 44.24 KNm 413
KN ,
Sqrt ( My2 + Mz2) KNm 59
Minimum moment due to minimum eccentricity of column is Min. Mu = 0.020 x 413.12 Pu fck.B.D
= =
Mu fck.B.D2
=
20
413 x
x 300
58.52 x
x 300
=
0.15
x
20
= x
8.26 KNm 10
3
10
6
300
0.230
20
=
0.1084
d' D
=
45 300
p fck
=
0.065
p
=
0.065
Ac
=
90000
mm 2
25
2
x
300
=
1.3 %
Ast- req
=
1.3
x 100
=
0.8/100 720
Minimum % of reinforcement
Provide
4 nos.
=
x
90000
mm 2
Tor 16
+
Ast Provided Maximum % of reinforcement
= =
2 1170 mm
90000
4/100 3600
4 nos. 2 1257 mm )
(= mm 2
Tor 12
x
90000
Reinforcement Provided for the section is more than mimimum and less than maximum Hence safe Diameter of lateral Ties Dia. of tie not less than
4
Spacing of ties required
=
Provide
Tor -
8
mm,
Provide
192 links
Tor -
8
mm
mm
@
150 mm
c/c
Check for minimum eccentricity In the direction of longer dimension e-min =
2262.4 500
e-min / lateral dimension
+ =
300 30
=
14.5
0.048
<
0.05
mm
Check for minimum eccentricity In the direction of shorter dimension e-min =
2262.4 500
e-min / lateral dimension
+ =
300 30
=
14.5
0.048
<
0.05
mm
Hence the following formula can be used for calculating load carrying capacity of the column Pu
= =
(
0.4 + 1069 KN
x 0.67
20 x
x 415
>
1.000 x 413 KN
26
x 1257 Hence safe
90000 )
5.2.2 Design of Footing The governing condition for the design of footing is the case 4
M 20 Fy 415
For the above case, Pu =
413
P
=
413 1.5
=
M
=
59 1.5
=
Mu
=
0.020
=
58.52 1.5
=
S.B.C
=
175
Footing area
=
275.4
Min. M
kN
Mu =
Providing footing size Size of the column
kNm
275.4 KN 39 KNm x
413
=
KN/m2 x 175 x x
11 no.s Tor -
1.00 1.40 0.30
m m
275.4 1.4 x 1.4
+
=
140.52
+
15.64
=
156.16
or
124.88
300
12
11 no. s Tor-
1400
B L
= =
1400 1400
d
=
400
-
50
=
332
39.01 1.40
<
x x
S.B.C of Soil
-
27
12
x
1.1 1.40
=
mm mm
mm
2 1.96 m )
(
100 =
2 1.57 m
=
100
Pressure from soil
8 KNm
39 KNm
1.40 0.30
400
59
12
1400
2
2 175 KN/m Hence Safe
-
12 2
100
In Long Span Direction Max. BM
=
156.16
=
33
Check for Depth dreq
= sqrt. {
=
(
Ast
=
KNm
1.5 0.133
x x
115 mm
2
33 20
<
1.5
x 1400
=
0.55 2
x
1.40
( Bending Moment Consideration)
= Mu/bd2
x
x x
1.00E+06 ) } 1400
332 mm
33.07 x
x
1400
x
332
Hence Safe 10
2
6
0.32 0.17 100
x
332 2 799 mm
= Provide
11
nos. Tor -
12
=
156.16
x
=
33
2
( =
1244 mm )
In Short Span Direction Max. BM
Check for Depth dreq
= sqrt. {
=
(
1.5 0.133
115 mm 1.5
Ast
=
x x
33 20
< x
1400 =
KNm
2
x
1.40
( Bending Moment Consideration)
= Mu/bd2
0.55 2
x x
1.00E+06 ) } 1400
332 mm
33.07 x
x
1400
x
332
Hence Safe 10
2
0.32 0.17 100
x
332 =
Provide
6
11
nos. Tor -
12
( =
28
2 799 mm 2
1244 mm )
( Transverse shear check) 1400
Check for One Way Shear Critical Section is at 'd' from face of column.
300
332
In Short Span Direction Vu =
1.5 x
Effective depth at critical section =
=
71.5 1400
Percentage of reinforcement
x x = =
Shear Strength of Concrete,
Check for Two Way Shear
1400
218
Overall Depth at critical section
v
300
x 1.40
)
156.16
x
=
(
=
400
400
-
=
332
1.00E+03 332
=
0.154
1244 1400
x x
100 332
0.218 71.5 KN
mm 62
-
mm
12 2
Mpa
=
0.268
8.68 c
=
0.370
> 0.154 Safe in shear
Mpa
( Punching Shear Check) 1400
Critical Section is at 'd/2' from face of column/pedestal
632 300 632
29
300
1400
Overall Depth at critical section d
=
400
= Vu
B
v
=
1.5 365.5 KN
=
2
=
2528 mm
=
where, k s
c
mm
-
62
-
12 2
x
156.16
x (
1.96 x
0.63 0.632 )
632
+
632
)
1.00E+03 332
=
x
365.5 2528
c
0.25 =
(
x x
Shear Strength of Concrete, cc
400
332 mm
=
=
=
=
sqrt
ks . (
20
(
0.5
+
300 300
=
1.000
x
1.12
=
1.12
cc
)
0.5
=
>
0.44
0.44 Mpa
= +
Short side of column Long side of column =
Mpa
30
1.12 Mpa
1.50
Hence Safe
>
)
1.0
6.0 DESIGN OF FLOOR SLAB
6.1 Design of Slab Span Assuming
(In First Floors)
=
3.049
110
mm
x
4.573
thick slab &
m
15
M 20 Fe 415
mm
clear cover
loads Self weight
=
0.110
x
25.00
=
2.75
KN/m2
Live Load
=
2.00
KN/m2
Floor Finishes
=
1.00
KN/m2
=
5.75
KN/m2
=
8.63
KN/m2
=
1.50
Total load Factored load
=
1.50
End condition :
x
5.75
Two adjacent edge discontineous
( From Table 26 of IS 456 - 2000 )
for ly/lx
At continuous edge Maximum BM, Mu = ( In short span direction )
0.0750
x
8.63 =
x 6.01
3.049 KNm
2
Maximum BM, Mu ( In long span direction )
=
0.047
x
8.63 =
x 3.77
3.049 KNm
2
Maximum BM, Mu = ( In short span direction )
0.056
x
8.63 =
x 4.49
3.049 KNm
2
Maximum BM, Mu ( In long span direction )
0.035
x
8.63 =
x 2.81
3.049 KNm
2
110
-
15
=
8 83
mm
15
=
91
mm
At mid span
Provided (for long span)
d
Provided (for short span)
d
=
8 / 2 =
110
8 / 2
31
i). At Continuous edge a). In short span direction Mu b.d2
=
6.01 1000
x x
=
0.248
pt
10 91
6
=
2
%
minimum steel to be provided in slabs
=
0.12
%
Ast
91
=
=
Provide
0.248 100
x
1000
x
8
@
150
3.77 1000
x x
=
0.218
Tor -
0.73
226
mm2
mm c/c ( = 335 mm2 ) at top in short span direction
b). In long span direction Mu b.d2
= pt
10 83
6
=
2
%
minimum steel to be provided in slabs
=
0.12
%
Ast
83
=
=
Provide
0.218 100
x
1000
x
8
@
150
4.49 1000
x x
=
0.218
Tor -
0.55
181
mm2
mm c/c ( = 335 mm2 ) at top in long span direction
ii). At mid span a). In short span direction Mu b.d2
= pt
10 91
6
=
2
%
minimum steel to be provided in slabs
=
0.12
%
Ast
91
=
=
Provide
0.218 100 Tor -
0.54
x
1000
x
8
@
150
32
198
mm2
mm c/c ( = 335 mm2 ) at bottom In short span direction
b). In long span direction Mu b.d2
= pt
2.81 1000
x x
=
0.158
10 83
6
=
2
%
minimum steel to be provided in slabs
=
0.12
%
Ast
83
=
=
0.158 100
Provide
Tor -
0.41
x
1000
x
8
@
150
131
mm2
mm c/c ( = 335 mm2 ) at bottom in long span direction
Check for depth provided For, 3049 91
pt
=
0.248
%
(span) (d)
=
33.5
x
1.3
dreq.
=
3049
/
43.55
=
70.0
<
83
33
=
mm
43.55401
Hence Safe
7.0 DESIGN OF BEAMS 7.1 Design of Beam - floor level @ Z=3.2m to Z= 6.4m (Frame ID B2-B3 ) (
230
x
400
M 20 Fe 415
)
Factored bending moments obtained from SAP analysis are, At mid span
=
64.50
KNm
At supports = 96.54 ( At face of the column )
KNm
i). At midspan X
d
d| d
Mu
=
2
x 2
=
=
41.0
=
400
=
359.0
=
33.0 359.0
=
0.09
x x
pt
=
0.701
Ast
=
0.701
2
Nos. Tor -
=
0.613
3
Nos. Tor -
ii). At supports X
d
+ +
x 2
49
400
-
41.0
10 359.0
6 2
=
2.18
359.0
=
; x
230 100
16 ( =
+ 628
x
230 100
16 ( =
Mu
=
3
x 3
=
=
2
mm
64.50 230
Provide
KNm
33
X
=
Asc
64.50
-
Mu bd2
Provide
{ Member ID 14 From SAP}
=
41.0
mm
= =
400 359.0
mm
-
+ 603 96.54 33
x
2 Nos. Tor 12 mm2 ) ------- Bottom steel x
359.0
34
=
0 Nos. Tor mm2 ) ------- Top steel
506 mm 2
12
KNm + +
X
579 mm 2
=
3
400
x 3
49
-
41.0
Mu bd2
=
96.54 230
d|
=
33
d| d
=
33 359.0
pt
=
1.100
Ast
=
1.100
3
Nos. Tor -
=
0.715
2
Nos. Tor -
Provide
Asc
Provide
x x
10 359.0
=
0.09
x
230 100
6 2
=
3.26
359.0
=
;
16 ( =
+ 942
x
x
3 Nos. Tor mm2 ) ------- Top steel
230 100
16 ( =
+ 628
x
359.0
908 mm 2
12
=
590 mm 2
2 Nos. Tor 12 mm2 ) ------- Bottom steel
Shear Design At effective depth d,
100 Ast bd (
c
Vu
=
100 230
from SP-16, Table-61 for c
=
0.700
Vus
=
Vu -
=
126600
=
68.80
Spacing
Provide
=
=
126.60
x x
942 359.0
Pt
= <
c.b.d
-
1.14 c,max
KN
=
1.14
( Pt )
=
3.1
N/mm 2
)
( Vus = shear to be carried by stirrups ) 0.700
x
230
x
x x
415 1000
x
@
150
359.0
KN
0.87 . fy . Asv . d Vus
=
0.87
=
189 2L
Tor -
x
101 68.8
mm 8
Stirrups
35
c/c
359.0
7.2 Design of Beam - floor level @ Z=3.2m to Z=12.8m (Remaining Beam) (
300
x
400
M 20 Fe 415
)
Factored bending moments obtained from SAP analysis are, At mid span
=
22.16
KNm
At supports = 42.95 ( At face of the column )
KNm
i). At midspan X
d
d| d
Mu
=
2
x 2
=
=
38.3
=
400
=
361.7
=
33.0 361.7
=
0.09
x x
pt
=
0.369
Ast
=
0.369
2
Nos. Tor -
=
0.369
2
Nos. Tor -
ii). At supports X
d
+ +
400
=
359.0
+ 515
x
300 100
16 ( =
x 2
=
300 100
16 ( =
2
41.0
10 361.7
x
=
=
x 1
49
400
-
38.3
6 2
=
0.56
361.7
=
;
Mu =
=
1
mm
22.16 300
Provide
KNm
33
X
=
Asc
22.16
-
Mu bd2
Provide
{ Member ID 178 From SAP}
-
+ 515 42.95 33
x
1 Nos. Tor 12 mm2 ) ------- Bottom steel x
361.7
mm
36
=
1 Nos. Tor mm2 ) ------- Top steel
400 mm 2
12
KNm + +
X
400 mm 2
=
2
400
x 2
49
-
41.0
Mu bd2
=
42.95 300
d|
=
33
d| d
=
33 359.0
pt
=
0.525
Ast
=
0.525
2
Nos. Tor -
=
0.369
2
Nos. Tor -
Provide
Asc
Provide
x x
10 359.0
=
0.09
x
300 100
6 2
=
1.11
359.0
=
;
16 ( =
+ 628
x
x
2 Nos. Tor mm2 ) ------- Top steel
300 100
16 ( =
+ 515
x
359.0
566 mm 2
12
=
397 mm 2
1 Nos. Tor 12 mm2 ) ------- Bottom steel
Shear Design At effective depth d,
100 Ast bd (
c
Vu
=
100 300
from SP-16, Table-61 for c
=
0.490
Vus
=
Vu -
=
74175
=
21.40
Spacing
Provide
=
=
74.18
x x
628 359.0
Pt
= <
c.b.d
-
0.58 c,max
KN
=
0.58
( Pt )
=
3.1
N/mm 2
)
( Vus = shear to be carried by stirrups ) 0.490
x
300
x
x x
415 1000
x
@
150
359.0
KN
0.87 . fy . Asv . d Vus
=
0.87
=
609 2L
Tor -
x
101 21.4
mm 8
Stirrups
37
c/c
359.0
8. DESIGN OF STAIR M 20 Fe 415 Tread = Riser =
260 180
Effective Horizontal Span For AB and CD (L+F)
mm mm
=
3.748 m
8.1 Loading Calculation Considering 1m stripe of slab Assuming landing and waist slab thickness
=
Weight of slab on slope w' = Weight on horizontal area w'' = Dead Load of Steps w* = Weight of Finishning w** = Live Load Lv =
2300 2797 1800 100 2500
N/m2 N/m2 N/m2 N/m2 N/m2
=
9497
N/m
Dead Load = Weight of Finishning w** = Live Load Lv =
2300 100 2500
N/m2 N/m2 N/m2
4900
N/m
Total Load WS
115
mm
2
For Landing Portion
Total Load WL
=
2
8.2 Design Section
9497 N/m 4900 N/m
8.2.1 For Flight AB
L1 F1
= =
1.067 2.48
L
=
3.55
RA = = RB = =
B 1.067 m
2.48 m
Fig - 1 Loading 1 2 x [ ((0.5 x WL) x (0.5 x L1 ))+(WS x F1 x ((0.5 x L1)+ F1)))] L 15717.948 N 1 x [ (0.5 X (WS x F12))+ ((0.5 x WL) x L1 x (L-(0.5 X L1)))] L 10459.499 N
SF is Zero at XA =
1.65
m from A
38
A
M max
[(RA x XA) - (WS x XA2 x 0.5)]
= =
Depth d
13006396 N-mm
= =
Sqrt (M/(1000 x R)) 123.7 mm
Provide Overall Depth D
=
Area of Steel Ast =
861
Using bars of Φ
12
mm
131.33
mm
125
mm
Spacing
=
Adopt Spacing = No of Bars Required
=
Area of Steel Provided
=
140
~
124.0 mm
mm
mm2 AΦ =
1000 125
=
8 2
905
mm /m
113.097
mm2
Nos OK
Provide 10 mm Φ @125 mm C/C Distribution Reinforcement Asd =
1.5D
=
210
mm2
Provide 8 mm Φ @150 mm C/C Shear Check V bd
Nominal Shear tv =
=
0.13
0.6
Safe in Shear
9497 N/m
8.2.2 For Flight BC
L1 = L2 = F2 =
1.067 1.067 1.24
m m m
L =
3.37
m
RC=RB =
<
2450 N/m
B
1.0671 m
2450 N/m
1.241 m
1.0671 m
0.5 x (0.5 x WL x L1 + W S x F2 + W L x L2) = 8505.1085 N
M max
= =
[(RC x 0.5 x L)-(WL x L1 x (L1+F2) x 0.5)-0.5 x WS x (F2 x 0.5)2)] x 1000 9507616 N-mm
39
C
Depth d
= =
Sqrt (M/(1000 x R)) 105.8 mm
Provide Overall Depth D
=
Area of Steel Ast =
736
Using bars of Φ
12
mm
153.58
mm
120
mm
Spacing
=
Adopt Spacing = No of Bars Required Area of Steel Provided
= =
140
~
106.0 mm
mm
mm2 AΦ =
1067.073 120
=
1006
mm
9 2
113.097
Nos OK
Provide 10 mm Φ @120 mm C/C Distribution Reinforcement Asd =
1.5D
=
Provide 8mm Φ @150 mm C/C
40
210
mm2
mm2
9.0 LIST OF DESIGN CODES AND STANDARDS
1). NBC- 000-114 :1994
: All relevant design codes in Nepal
2). IS 456 - 2000
: Code of Practice for Plain and Reinforced Concrete.
3). IS 875 - 1987
: Code of Practice for Design Loads ( other than Earth Quake ) for Buildings and Structures.
4). IS 1893 ( Part 1) - 2002
: Code of Practice for Earth Quake resistant design of Structures.
5). IS 13920 - 1993
: Code of Practice for Ductile Detailing of Reinforced Concrete Structures Subjected to Seismic Forces.
6). SP : 16 - 1980
: Design Aids for Reinforced Concrete to IS 456 - 1978.
7). SAP 2000 - V 14
: Proprietary program of Research Engineers.
41
10.0 RESULT SUMMARY 1.0 Column Detail Column ID
Type
Size
75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90
Square Square Square Square Square Square Square Square Square Square Square Square Square Square Square Square
(12"x12") (12"x12") (12"x12") (12"x12") (14"x14") (14"x14") (12"x12") (12"x12") (14"x14") (14"x14") (12"x12") (12"x12") (12"x12") (12"x12") (12"x12") (12"x12")
Reinforcement detail GF to 1st floor 2nd floor 4-16Ф+4-12Ф 4-16Ф+4-12Ф 4-16Ф+4-12Ф 4-16Ф+4-12Ф 4-20Ф+4-16Ф 4-20Ф+4-16Ф 4-16Ф+4-16Ф 4-16Ф+4-16Ф 4-20Ф+4-16Ф 4-20Ф+4-16Ф 4-16Ф+4-16Ф 4-16Ф+4-16Ф 4-16Ф+4-12Ф 4-16Ф+4-12Ф 4-16Ф+4-12Ф 4-16Ф+4-12Ф
4-16Ф+4-12Ф 4-16Ф+4-12Ф 4-16Ф+4-12Ф 4-16Ф+4-12Ф 4-16Ф+4-12Ф 4-16Ф+4-12Ф 4-16Ф+4-16Ф 4-16Ф+4-16Ф 4-16Ф+4-12Ф 4-16Ф+4-12Ф 4-16Ф+4-16Ф 4-16Ф+4-16Ф 4-16Ф+4-12Ф 4-16Ф+4-12Ф 4-16Ф+4-12Ф 4-16Ф+4-12Ф
2.0 Beam Detail
3-16Ф+3-12Ф 2-16Ф+2-12Ф
At Support
3-16Ф+0-12Ф 2-16Ф+2-12Ф
At Midspan At Z=3.2m to Z= 6.4m (Frame ID B2-B3)
2-16Ф+2-12Ф 2-16Ф+1-12Ф
At Support
2-16Ф+1-12Ф 2-16Ф+1-12Ф
At Midspan At Z=3.2m to Z=12.8m (Remaining Beam)
For Strap Beam:Adopt 14"x20" Strap beam with 2-16Ф+2-12Ф as top and bottom bar throughout.
42
11.0 CHECKLIST FOR STRUCTURAL DESIGN AND SPECIFICATION S.N. Description
As per submitted design
1. General: G+2 Number of Storey 12.80m Total height of structure Structure system Load Bearing ……. Frame √ Others ……. If Computer Aided Design (CAD) is used, please state the name of the package Yes No √ a) Provision for future extension b) If Yes - How many floors will be …... Floors extended? c) Structural design consideration for Yes …... No ……. future extension. 2. Requirements of NEPAL NATIONAL BUILDING CODE (NBC) 2.1 NBC-000-1994 Requirements for Professionally Enngineered Building : An Introduction International State-of-the-art ……. Professionally Engineered Structures √ Level of design: Mandatory Rule of thumb ……. Guidelines to rural buildings ……. 2.2 NBC 101:1994 Materials Specifications √ Cement √ Coarse Aggregates √ Fine Aggregates (Sand) ........ Building Lime √ Bricks Tick the listed materials that ........ Natural building stones will be used in the construction √ Timber ........ Tiles √ Structural steel ........ Metal frames Other ………………… In what manner / way have you used NBC 101 ? 2.3 NBC 102-1994 Unit Weight of Materials Where do you plan to apply NBC 102 ? Specify the design unit weight of materials Steel Brick RCC Brick Masonry
Design Calculation √ …….. Specifications …….. Bill of Quantity
BOQ ……. √
Design Calculation
. 78 KN/m3 19 KN/m3
25 KN/m3 20 KN/m3
2.4 NBC 103-1994 Occupancy load (Imposed Load) Proposed occupancy type Occupancy load (Fill in only concerning occupancy Uniformly Distributed load Concentrated Load (kN) type) (kN/m2) For Residential/Apartment Buildings Rooms and Kitchen 2.00 Corridors, Staircase, store 3.00 Balcony 3.00 ………………..
43
2.5 NBC 104-1994 Wind load Wind zone Basic wind velocity …….. m/s 2.6 NBC 105-1994 Seismic Design of Buildings in Nepal √ Seismic coefficient method Method of earthquake analysis: Model Response Spectrum method …….. ……………………………………. II Subsoil category 0.39 sec Fundamental transactions period 0.08 Basic seismic coefficient 0.99 Seismic zoning factor 1.00 Importance factor 1.00 Structural performance factor 2.7 NBC 106 : 1994 Snow load N/A 2.8 NBC 107: 1994 Provisional Recommendation on Fire Safety N/A 2.9 NBC 108: 1994 Site Consideration for Seismic Hazards Distance from toe/beginning of Distance from river bank Medium soil Soil type in footing 175 KN/m2 Adopted safe bearing capacity Isolated Type of foundation 2m Depth of foundation Soil test report available? Yes …….. No √ 2.10 NBC 109 : 1994 Masonry : Unreinforced N/A 2.11 NBC 110 : 1994 Plain and Reinforced Concrete Concrete grade M15 …….. M20 √ M25 …….. Other …….. Fe 415 Reinforcement Steel Grade 10'0''x15'0'' Critical size of slab panel Calculated short span to effective depth 33.50 ratio (L/d) for corresponding slab Permissible L/d ratio Effective depth Span correction factor Tension reinforcement (Ast)Percent Ast modification factor Compression reinforcement modification factor Beam characteristics
Maximum span/depth ratio Span of corresponding beam Depth of corresponding beam Width of corresponding beam Maximum slenderness ratio of column Lateral dimension of corresponding column Design Philosophy:
40 91 mm
Condition of beams CantiSimply lever supported
One side Continuous
Both side continuous
11.43 4572 mm 400 mm 230 mm 6.5 350 mm √ Limit State method Working stress method …….. Ultimate strength method ……..
Load Combinations: 1: 2: 3: 4:
Mentioned in Design Sheets
44
2.12 NBC : 111-1994 Steel Design assumption: Yield Stress: Least wall thickness Exposed condition For Exposed Section For not exposed section Have you used Truss? What is the critical span of purlin Purlin size Have you used steel post? Slenderness ratio of the critical post 2.13 NBC : 112 Timber Name of structural wood: Modulus of Elasticity: Critical span of the beam element Designed deflection Slenderness ratio of the critical post Joint type: 2.14 NBC : 113 : 1994 Aluminium Have you used aluminium as structure member? If yes, please mention the name of design code. 2.15 NBC : 114 : 1994 Construction safety Are you sure that all safety measures will be fulfilled in the construction site as per this code ? Safety wares use
Simple connection Semi-rigid connection Fully rigid connection
Pipe
Webs of Standard size
Yes
No √
Yes
No √
Yes No √
Yes No
√ ……..
Safety hard hat √ Safety goggles √ Safety boots √ Safety belt √ First aid facility √
45
Composite section