页码,1/36
GO TO ASME.ORG HOME >
Interpretation Detail Print to PDF Please limit your selection on the search results screen to 10 interpretations. Standard Designation: BPV Section IX Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No: Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-407.4, Postweld Heat Treatment
Record Number:
BC91-614
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
02/28/1992 IX-92-33
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Can a PQR conducted on a 2 in. thick base metal with notch toughness required and PWHT above the upper transformation temperature be used to support a WPS on a ½ in. thick base metal with all other essential variables, including notch toughness, unchanged? Reply: No.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No: Subject Description: Date Issued:
Record Number:
Interpretation Number :
BPV Section IX Section IX, QW-200.2(b) and QW-300.2; Manufacturer's and Contractor's Responsibility 12/20/1991 BC91-415 IX-92-25
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): According to QW-200.2(b), may a manufacturer or contractor provide guidelines for a procedure qualification, and a WPS, and a welder to a test lab, then audit on random basis and certify the procedure? Reply (1): No.
Question (2): According to QW-300.2, may a manufacturer or contractor provide acceptance and rejection criteria, a WPS, and a welder performance for a qualification test to a test lab then audit on a random basis and accept responsibility for the performance qualification test? Reply (2): No. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-306; Combination of Welding Process
Record Number:
BC91-470
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
12/20/1991 IX-92-26
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码,2/36
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: When a welder has been qualified using a single welding process and later takes a test using a combination of welding processes, which includes the previously qualified process, and does not pass, does this affect the earlier qualification? Reply: No.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section II, Part C, SA 5.4 - Table 4
Record Number:
BC91-471
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
12/20/1991 IX-92-27
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Should the footnotes a, b, and c of Table 4 read as follows: a) See Section 10 and 14.2 b) See Section 11.1 and 14.3 c) See Section 11.2 and Figs. I and 3? Reply: Yes.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No: Subject Description: Date Issued:
Record Number:
Interpretation Number :
BPV Section IX Section IX, QW-281.2(f); Corrosion-Resistant Weld Metal Overlay Essential Variables 12/20/1991 BC91-472 IX-92-28
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: May a corrosion-resistant weld metal overlay procedure qualification test joint 2 in. in thickness that was postweld heat treated (PWHT) for 2 hr (1 hr per in.) qualify a PWHT of a 5 in. thick material for 5 hr (1 hr per in.)? Reply: No.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-151.3 and QW-462.1, Tension Tests and Test Specimens
Record Number:
BC91-473
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
02/28/1992 IX-92-29
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): For plate coupon, welded by one process and procedure, may either reduced-section specimens conforming to the requirements given in QW-462.1(a) or turned specimens conforming to the requirements given in QW-462.1(d) be used for tension test specimens? Reply (1): Yes.
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码,3/36
Question (2): For a 2 in. plate test coupon welded with one process and procedure, may two turned 0.505 tensile specimens conforming to QW462.1(d) be used for each tension test? Reply (2): Yes.
Question (3): In performing tension tests on a 2 in. test coupon welded with one process and procedure using turned specimens conforming to QW462.1(d) and spaced in accordance with QW-151.3(b), is it acceptable if portions of weld deposit are not included in the tension tests? Reply (3): Yes. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-200.1, General Welding Procedure Qualifications
Record Number:
BC91-587
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
02/28/1992 IX-92-30
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Does QW-200.1(c) require that there be a history of changes such as margin notes or other record documenting what specific changes were made in the essential, nonessential, or supplemental variables each time a WPS is revised? Reply: No.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-310, Qualification of Test Coupons
Record Number:
BC91-613
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
02/28/1992 IX-92-31
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: May a welder repair the root pass from the root side of a Welder Performance test coupon and be qualified to weld without backing? Reply: No.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-351, General Welding Variables for Welders
Record Number:
BC91-631
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
Question(s) and Reply(ies):
02/28/1992 IX-92-32
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码,4/36
Question: When using a single test coupon for welder performance qualifications, is it necessary to determine the deposited weld metal thickness for each process the welder uses to weld the single test coupon? Reply: Yes. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No: Subject Description: Date Issued:
Record Number:
Interpretation Number :
BPV Section IX Section IX, QW-451, Groove-Weld Procedure Qualification Thickness Limits and Test Specimens 02/28/1992 BC91-586 IX-92-34
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): Tables QW-451.1 and QW-451.2 state limits for base metal and deposited weld metal thickness. Where QW-250 lists variables applicable to thickness, do these variables supersede the limits of QW-451.1 and QW-451.2? Reply (1): Yes.
Question (2): Tables QW-451.1 .and QW-451.2 do not give a minimum deposited weld metal thickness. When the variable QW-403.6 states a minimum base metal thickness, does this minimum also apply to deposited weld metal? Reply (2): No. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No: Subject Description: Date Issued:
Record Number:
Interpretation Number :
BPV Section IX Section IX, QW-452.1, Transverse Bend Test for Performance Qualification Thickness Limits and Test Specimens 02/28/1992 BC91-277 IX-92-35
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Even though QW-484 does not provide space for documenting conformance of the test coupon groove with the requirements of QW-452.1, Notes 8 or 9, does a signed Record of Welder/Welding Operator Performance Qualification form indicate that these requirements have been met? Reply: Yes.
Note: However, at the present moment, QW-484 is under consideration for possible revision. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
BPV Section IX
Para./Fig./Table No:
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码,5/36
Subject Description: Date Issued:
Record Number:
Interpretation Number :
Section IX, QW-452.1, Transverse Bend Test for Performance Qualification Thickness Limits and Test Specimens 02/28/1992 BC91-616 IX-92-36
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Interpretation IX-83-90 states:
"Question (1): Can a double-beveled plate, 1 in. thick with each beveled groove being ½ in., be welded by a welder qualified to weld a weld metal deposit of 0.864 in.? Reply (1): No.
Question (2): Can the same joint as above be welded by two individual welders, each with a deposited weld metal qualification of 0.864 in., provided each welder does not exceed 0.864 in.? Reply (2): Yes."
Question: Can a double-beveled plate, 1½ in. thick with each beveled groove being ½ in., be welded by two individual welders, one on each side of the plate and each with a deposited weld metal qualification of 0.864 in., provided each welder does not exceed 0.864 in.? Reply: Yes. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No: Subject Description: Date Issued:
Record Number:
Interpretation Number :
BPV Section IX Section IX, QW-151 and QW-451, Tension Test Specimens and GrooveWeld Procedure Qualification Thickness Limits and Test Specimens 02/28/1992 BC92-097 IX-92-37
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): Do paragraphs QW-151.1, QW-151.2, QW-151.3, and QW151.4 define the number of tension test specimens required for each tension test as specified in QW-451.1 and QW-451.2? Reply (1): Yes.
Question (2): Do Tables QW-451.1 and QW-451.2 specify the minimum required number of tension and guided bend tests needed for various groove welded coupons, regardless of diameter when pipe or tube is used? Reply (2): Yes. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No: Subject Description: Date Issued:
BPV Section IX Section IX, QW-200, General Welding Procedure Qualifications 05/28/1992
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码,6/36
Record Number:
Interpretation Number :
BC91-630 IX-92-38
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Background: A welder was monitored while performing production welding and was found to be welding above the amperage range listed on the WPS for a specific electrode diameter (SMAW process). Question: Does Section IX require the WPS to be amended or requalified, as applicable, when a variable is not followed such as welding above or below the established amperage or voltage range listed on the WPS? Reply: The disposition of nonconformances is not within the scope of Section IX. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-300.3, Simultaneous Qualification of Welders
Record Number:
BC92-121
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
05/28/1992 IX-92-39
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Background: Three contractors desire to use the same WPS and simultaneously qualify welders in accordance with QW-300. Each contractor has a pre-existing PQR covering the scope of the WPS. Each contractor's name and corresponding PQR number is entered on the WPS and separate signature blocks are provided for each contractor. This method of weld procedure and welder performance qualification and operational controls is described in the QC system for each contractor. Question (1): May the WPS described be used to simultaneously qualify welders? Reply (1): Yes.
Question (2): May the WPS described be used for production welding by all three contractors? Reply (2): Yes. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-409.1, Electrical Characteristics
Record Number:
BC92-110
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
05/28/1992 IX-92-40
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): When notch toughness tests are a requirement, and option QW-409.1(a) is chosen as a means of determining heat input, must the actual voltage, amperage, and travel speed used be recorded on the PQR? Reply (1): Yes.
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码,7/36
Question (2): When notch toughness tests are a requirement, and option QW-409.1(b), bead size, is chosen as a means of determining heat input, must the actual bead width and height deposited to ascertain "Volume of Weld Metal" deposited be recorded on the PQR? Reply (2): Yes.
Question (3): May either of the above methods be substituted for the other, when writing a WPS that has notch toughness requirements, by estimating the values of the "other" method [i.e., using option (a) (with estimated amps, volts, and travel speed) when option (b) (actual Volume of Weld Metal) was used when the test coupon was welded]? Reply (3): No.
Question (4): When notch toughness tests are a requirement, and option QW-409.1(b), bead size, is chosen as a means of determining heat input, can any electrode diameter be used as long as the volume of deposited weld metal, which is recorded on the PQR, is not exceeded? Reply (4): Yes. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No: Subject Description: Date Issued:
Record Number:
Interpretation Number :
BPV Section IX Section IX, QW-461.9, Performance Qualifications - Position and Diameter Limitations 05/28/1992 BC92-035 IX-92-41
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Are welders qualified on plate in 2G, 3G, and 4G positions qualified to weld on pipe less than 24 in. OD in the 5G position? Reply: No.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-200.4(a), Combination of Welding Processes
Record Number:
BC92-011
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
09/30/1992 IX-92-42
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: May a single set of weld metal impact test specimens be used to qualify two or more processes or procedures? Reply: Yes, provided weld metal from each process or procedure is included in each specimen.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
BPV Section IX
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码,8/36
Para./Fig./Table No: Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-492, Definition of Machine Welding
Record Number:
BC92-100
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
09/30/1992 IX-92-43
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Is a GMAW spot welding process in which all variables are preset, except for placement of the nozzle against the material and activation of the trigger by the operator, considered machine welding? Reply: Yes.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-251.4 and QW-280, Special Processes
Record Number:
BC92-168
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
09/30/1992 IX-92-44
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): According to the 1990 Addenda of Section IX, are there any supplementary essential or nonessential variables required to be addressed in a WPS for the special processes described in QW-280? Reply (1): No.
Question (2): According to the 1991 Addenda of Section IX, are there any supplementary essential or nonessential variables required to be addressed in a WPS for the special processes described in QW-251.4? Reply (2): No. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-303.2 and QW-452.4, Fillet Welds
Record Number:
BC92-238
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
09/30/1992 IX-92-45
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: When Section IX requires separate performance qualification for fillet welds on small diameter pipe, does the same requirement apply to longitudinal fillet welds (such as the attachment of gussets in the longitudinal direction)? Reply: No.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
BPV Section IX
Para./Fig./Table No: Subject Description:
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码,9/36
Date Issued:
Record Number:
Interpretation Number :
Section IX, QW-303.3 and QW-461.9, Special Positions for Performance Qualification 09/30/1992 BC92-265 IX-92-46
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Is a welder who is qualified to weld groove welds in a special orientation also qualified to weld in the 1G position? Reply: Yes.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-322.2, Renewal of Qualification
Record Number:
BC92-266
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
09/30/1992 IX-92-47
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: May the renewal of welder and welding operator performance qualification be done on production work? Reply: Yes.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-407.2, Postweld Heat Treatment
Record Number:
BC93-586
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
11/22/1993 IX-92-84
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Background: A PQR was welded on a 2 in. thick P-No. 1, Gr. 2 material and post weld heat treated at 1150"F for six hours (3 hrs/in.) with supplementary essential variable requirements.
Question: Will this PQR support a WPS for a production weld in 2 in. thick P-No. 1, Gr. 2 material that is PWHT at 1150°F for 2 hours (1 hr/in.)? Reply: Yes.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-201, Manufacturer's or Contractor's Responsibility
Record Number:
BC95-482
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
Question(s) and Reply(ies):
03/19/1996 IX-95-27
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码,10/36
Question: May a subcontractor use a WPS supported by a PQR which was qualified by the contracting company and subsequently supplied to the subcontractor? Reply: No. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-403.10, Short Circuiting Mode
Record Number:
BC96-002
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
03/19/1996 IX-95-28
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Are the base metal thickness restrictions for the GMAW process short circuiting mode stated in QW-403.10 and QW-404.32 also applicable to fillet weld tests, either in procedure qualifications (QW-451.3, QW451.4) or in performance qualifications (QW-452.4, QW-452.5, and QW452.6)? Reply: No.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-466, Test Jigs
Record Number:
BC92-267
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
09/30/1992 IX-92-48
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: In determining the appropriate test jig dimensions of QW-466 to use for bend tests, is it permissible to use the dimensions corresponding to P-No. 35 material when the filler metal is a F-No. 36, even though the base material is other than a P-No. 35 material? Reply: No.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-466, Test Jigs
Record Number:
BC92-268
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
09/30/1992 IX-92-49
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: In qualifying a welding procedure which utilizes a F-No. 36 filler of ER CuAl-A1 (SFA 5.7) for corrosion resistant weld metal overlay of a P-No. 1 carbon steel material, is the required mandrel diameter for side bend testing 4t as determined from column A of QW-466.1, QW-466.2 or QW-466.3?
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码,11/36
Reply: Yes. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-403.6, Base Metals
Record Number:
BC92-217
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
09/30/1992 IX-92-50
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: If Heat Affected Zone (HAZ) notch toughness requirements are applicable, does QW-403.6, base metal thickness requirements, apply? Reply: Yes.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No: Subject Description: Date Issued:
Record Number:
Interpretation Number :
BPV Section IX Section IX, QW-451.3 and QW-462.4, Fillet Weld Test SpecimensProcedure, and QW-452.4, Performance Qualification Thickness Limits and Test Specimens 09/30/1992 BC92-276 IX-92-51
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: If a welder performs a procedure qualification per QW-462.4(d) using 2 in. NPS pipe and passes, is he qualified for all diameters as outlined in QW-451.3? Reply: No, per QW-452.4 he is qualified down to 1 in. O.D.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No: Subject Description: Date Issued:
Record Number:
Interpretation Number :
BPV Section IX Section IX, QW-462.5, Corrosion-Resistant Overlay Cladding/Hard-Facing Overlay, Chemical Analysis Specimen 12/14/1992 BC92-252 IX-92-52
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: May only one chemical analysis specimen be removed from the vertical portion of a 6G positioned hard facing welded PQR coupon when the weld travel direction is reversed every other weld pass resulting in weld beads deposited in vertical-upward and vertical-downward direction? Reply: Yes, provided a chemical analysis represents each vertical travel direction.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
BPV Section IX
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码,12/36
Para./Fig./Table No: Subject Description: Date Issued:
Record Number:
Interpretation Number :
Section IX, QW-452.1, Groove Weld Procedure Qualifications Thickness Limits and Test Specimens 12/14/1992 BC92-254 IX-92-53
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: A welder has qualified on 3 in. O.D. ½ in. wall pipe in the 1G position. He has also qualified on 1¼ in. O.D. 1/8 in. wall pipe in the 6G position. Is he qualified to weld 1¼ in. O.D. ½ in. wall in all positions? Reply: No.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-214.3, Corrosion-Resistant Weld Metal Overlay
Record Number:
BC92-305
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
12/14/1992 IX-92-54
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Prior to the 1991 Addenda, did QW-214.3 address the number of chemical analysis tests required for Corrosion Resistant Weld Metal Overlay utilizing the GTAW Machine Welding Process in the 5G or 6G position? Reply: No.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-103.2, Records
Record Number:
BC92-307
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
12/14/1992 IX-92-55
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Is it acceptable to satisfy the requirements of QW-103.2 for record maintenance, certification, and accessibility by means of an electronic storage medium, e.g., computer database?
Reply: Section IX does not address the media in which records are required to be maintained.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-451.3, Fillet Weld Tests
Record Number:
BC92-308
Date Issued:
12/14/1992
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码,13/36
Interpretation Number :
IX-92-56
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: A welder performs a fillet weld procedure qualification in accordance with QW-451.3, which fails; therefore, neither the procedure nor the welder are qualified. Is it permissible for the welder to then perform a successful groove weld procedure qualification test and be qualified for grooves and fillets? Reply: Yes.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No: Subject Description: Date Issued:
Record Number:
Interpretation Number :
BPV Section IX Section IX, 1989 Edition A91 Addenda, QW-253, QW-256, and QW-406.3, Maximum Interpass Temperature 12/14/1992 BC92-354 IX-92-57
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: According to the 1991 Addenda of Section IX, is it permissible to revise a WPS by increasing interpass temperature to more than 100°F above that recorded on the supporting PQR when supplementary essential variables do not apply without requalification? Reply: Yes.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-364, Friction Welding
Record Number:
BC92-357
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
12/14/1992 IX-92-58
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: For performance qualification, is a friction weld operator required to requalify for each seat size and base metal combination to be qualified to operate the machine? Reply: Yes.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No: Subject Description: Date Issued:
Record Number:
Interpretation Number :
BPV Section IX Section IX, QW-306, Combination of Welding Processes, QW-452.1 and QW-452.3, Performance Qualification Thickness Limits and Test Specimens 02/22/1993 BC92-206 IX-92-59
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Background: The combination of welding processes and pipe diameters listed below were used for performance qualification:
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码,14/36
(1) 2 in. Sch. 80 (.218) pipe with open butt using GTAW process. (2) 2 in. Sch. 160 (.343) pipe with consumable insert and fill pass using the GTAW process and the remainder welded with SMAW process. (3) 6 in. XXS (.864) using SMAW process with backing.
Question: Using the combinations listed in the Background, in accordance with QW-306, Note 2 of QW-452.1 to determine maximum thickness qualified, and QW-452.3 for minimum diameter qualification, is the welder qualified to weld on unlimited thickness and diameters above 1 in., using either an open butt joint or a consumable insert with the root layer deposited with the GTAW process and the remainder deposited with the SMAW process? Reply: Yes. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-214, Corrosion-Resistant Weld Metal Overlay
Record Number:
BC92-421
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
02/22/1993 IX-92-60
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: When corrosion-resistant weld metal overlay is deposited in a base material groove to a depth that is not included in the design calculations must the deposit be tested as a groove weld? Reply: No.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No: Subject Description: Date Issued:
Record Number:
Interpretation Number :
BPV Section IX Section II, Part C, SFA 5.13, Specification for Solid Surfacing Welding Rods and Electrodes 02/22/1993 BC92-422 IX-92-61
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: May powdered filler metal be classified under Section II, Part C, SFA 5.13? Reply: No.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-408.2, Shielding Gas
Record Number:
BC92-425
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
02/22/1993 IX-92-62
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码,15/36
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): When changing shielding gases of a specific mixture, is it permissible to adjust the nominal percentage(s) of the minor component(s) by +/- 20% without requalifying the procedure? Reply (1): No.
Question (2): In addition, when the absolute value of +/- 20% times the nominal percentage of a minor component is less than 1%, would it be permissible to make a +/- 1% adjustment to the gas mixture? Reply (2): No. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-153.1, Tensile Strength
Record Number:
BC92-452
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
02/22/1993 IX-92-63
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: A welding procedure qualification test coupon is welded using P-No. 23, SB-209, alloy 6061 aluminum base material in the ("o") temper. After welding the test coupon, it is subjected to a "T-6" heat treatment. To establish acceptability of tensile tests per QW-153.1, may the tensile requirements of QW-422 for SB-209, alloy 6061 (T4 and T6 tempers in the welded condition) be used? Reply: No.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-322, Expiration and Renewal of Qualification
Record Number:
BC92-464
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
05/26/1993 IX-92-64
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Background: A welding operator is in. the process of renewing his/her qualification using machine GTAW welding equipment. During the process the machine malfunctions and burns through the root pass of the test coupon. No operator error is noted. Following the malfunction, the test coupon is repaired using a manual GTAW process. After the repair the machine welding equipment is used to complete the rest of the test coupon. Question: May a welding operator performance test coupon being welded for qualification or renewal be repaired prior to testing using a manual welding procedure? Reply: No. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
BPV Section IX
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码,16/36
Para./Fig./Table No: Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-423.1, Alternate Base Metals for Welder Qualification
Record Number:
BC93-148
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
05/26/1993 IX-92-65
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: In QW-423.1, is P-No. 42 included in P-No. 4X? Reply: Yes.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-201, Manufacturer's or Contractor's Responsibility
Record Number:
BC93-377
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
05/26/1993 IX-92-66
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Background: Company A and Company B merge divisions to form a new Company, C. Question (1): May the new Company, C, use PQRs and WPSs developed previously by Company A and Company B?
Reply (1): Yes, provided operational control is in accordance with QW-201. Question (2): May the new Company, C, use the central materials laboratory of Company A to develop WPSs and PQRs?
Reply (2): Yes, provided operational control is in accordance with QW-201. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-201, Manufacturer's or Contractor's Responsibility
Record Number:
BC93-391
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
05/26/1993 IX-92-67
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: In a contract involving piping construction work, our company subcontracted the piping prefabrication work to a subcontractor. This subcontractor is managed by our company but has a different name. The subcontractor proceeded to qualify welding procedures which were conducted in the presence and with the approval of our company's welding engineer who monitored the welding of the test coupons and signed approval on the PQRs. The Quality Control System of the subcontractor and our company fully describe the operational control of procedure qualifications. Was our client right in rejecting the use by our company of the subcontractor qualified welding procedures for the erection work of the prefabricated piping? Reply: This is a contractual issue, which ASME does not address.
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码,17/36
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No: Subject Description: Date Issued:
Record Number:
Interpretation Number :
BPV Section IX Section IX, QW-306, Combination of Welding Processes, and QW-451, Groove Weld Procedure Qualification Thickness Limits and Test Specimens 06/30/1993
BC92-011A IX-92-68
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: In using a single set of test specimens to qualify two or more processes or procedures, does Section IX specify a minimum weld deposit thickness to be included in each test specimen from each of the processes or procedures? Reply: No.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-409.1, Electrical Characteristics
Record Number:
BC92-011B, BC92-228, BC92-353
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
06/30/1993 IX-92-69
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Is it the intent of QW-409.1 that the heat input, to be recorded on the PQR, be calculated based on the parameters used at the location where the impact specimens were removed? Reply: Yes.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-403.5, Base Metals
Record Number:
BC92-450
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
09/22/1993 IX-92-70
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): When a procedure qualification with supplemental notch toughness requirement is conducted with one P-Number material having multiple certifications in different Group Numbers, are WPSs qualified for all combinations of the Group Numbers? Reply (1): Yes.
Question (2): In the above question, does one set of HAZ impact specimens, when required, satisfy the requirements of Section IX? Reply (2): Yes.
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码,18/36
Question (3): When a procedure qualification with supplemental notch toughness requirements is conducted with two materials of different P-Numbers each having multiple certifications in different Group Numbers, are WPSs qualified for all combination of the multiple certified Group Numbers of the first P-Number material to the multiple certified Group Numbers of the second P-Number material? Reply (3): Yes.
Question (4): In the above question, does one set of HAZ impact specimens from each P-Number material, when required, satisfy the requirements of Section IX? Reply (4): Yes.
Question (5): In Question (3), are materials from the multiple certified Group Numbers qualified for welding a P-Number material to itself? Reply (5): No. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-302.4, Visual Examination
Record Number:
BC93-365
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
09/22/1993 IX-92-71
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Are welders or welding operators qualified in accordance with Section IX prior to the 1992 addenda, for which the results of visual examination required by QW-302.4 were not documented on the WPQ, required to requalify in order that visual examination results may be documented? Reply: No.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No: Subject Description: Date Issued:
Record Number:
Interpretation Number :
BPV Section IX Section IX, QW-381(c), Corrosion Resistant Weld Metal Overlay, QW-453 and QW-461.9, Performance Qualification 09/22/1993 BC93-392 IX-92-72
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): May welder qualifications for corrosion-resistant overlays per QW-381 and QW-453 be made on plate, when qualifying for welding on pipe/tubes parallel to the axis of the pipe/ tubes? Reply (1): Yes.
Question (2)(a): Should the side bends required in QW-453 consist of the base metal plus overlay thickness, after surface conditioning per Note 4 of QW-453?
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码,19/36
Question (2)(b): When the overlay test specimens are less than 3/8 in. thick, may the side bend specimen width be the test specimen thickness? Question (2)(c): May the edges of the overlay be outside of the bent area as long as at least a 1-1/2 in. width of overlay and HAZ are completely within the bend? Reply (2)(a): Yes.
Reply (2)(b): Yes. Reply (2)(c): Yes.
Question (3): May QW-461.9 Groove-Pipe be used for the position essential variable rules for welder qualifications on corrosion-resistant overlap? Reply (3): Yes. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No: Subject Description: Date Issued:
Record Number:
Interpretation Number :
BPV Section IX Section IX, QW-321.3, Welder Qualification After Further Training or Practice 09/22/1993 BC93-468 IX-92-73
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Background: A welder performance qualification test plate fails to meet the radiographic requirements for qualification. After further training a new performance qualification test plate is welded. Question: May the new test plate be evaluated by bend testing? Reply: Yes. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QB-402.1, Base Metals
Record Number:
BC93-474
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
09/22/1993 IX-92-74
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: When brazing material used for a procedure qualification test is not listed in QB-422 or Appendix C, but is similar to P-No. 107 or S-No. 107 materials listed in QB-422 or Appendix C, may this material be considered as a P-No. 107 or S-No. 107 material in accordance with QB402.1? Reply: No.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
BPV Section IX
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码,20/36
Para./Fig./Table No: Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-200.4(b), Combination of Welding Procedures
Record Number:
BC93-490
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
09/22/1993 IX-92-75
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: When writing multi-process welding procedures per QW-200.4 (a), where the tube wall thickness is less than 1 in., using a separate qualification for the root deposit only, must the root deposit qualification coupon be 1/2 in. minimum thickness as stated in QW-200.4(b)? Reply: No.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-462, Test Specimens
Record Number:
BC93-515
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
09/22/1993 IX-92-76
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: QW-462 defines W as "specimen width, 3/4 in." Is 3/4 in. a minimum or maximum dimension requirement for preparing a reduced section tensile specimen? Reply: No.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No: Subject Description: Date Issued:
Record Number:
Interpretation Number :
BPV Section IX Section IX, QW-200.4, Combination of Welding Procedures, and QW451.4, Fillet Welds Qualified by Groove Weld Tests 09/22/1993 BC93-518 IX-92-77
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Background: A butt welding procedure qualification was completed on a pipe with E6010 electrode (F-No. 3) for the root pass and E7018 electrode (F-No. 4) for the remaining process. Question (1): Will the above procedure qualification alone support a WPS to make a fillet weld with E-7018 electrodes (F-No.4) for all the passes for all fillet sizes on all base metal thicknesses when all the other essential variables under QW-253, SMAW process, are the same? Reply (1): Yes.
Question (2): Will the above procedure qualification alone support a WPS to make a butt weld with E-7018 electrodes (F-No. 4) for all the passes including the root pass within the limits of qualification of QW-451.1 and within the limits of the essential variables under QW-253, SMAW process? Reply (2): Yes.
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码,21/36
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-200.2(b), Welding Procedure Qualifications
Record Number:
BC93-561
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
09/22/1993 IX-92-78
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): May a company subcontract weld procedure development and qualification including certification of the PQR without a company representative present to witness the welding, testing, and certification? Reply (1): No.
Question (2): May a company subcontract weld procedure development and qualification including certification of the PQR with a company representative present to witness the welding, testing, and certification? Reply (2): No. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No: Subject Description: Date Issued:
Record Number:
Interpretation Number :
BPV Section IX Section IX - 1989 Edition, Addenda 91; QW-151.1, Tension Tests, Reduced Section-Plate, and QW-462.1(a), Test Specimens 09/22/1993 BC93-583 IX-92-79
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): Is it permissible to reduce a plate test coupon thickness beyond removing the reinforcement to allow for parallel surfaces? Reply (1): Yes.
Question (2): What percentage of the thickness is permissible to be removed for procedure qualification? Reply (2): The minimum necessary to obtain parallel surfaces. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No: Subject Description: Date Issued:
Record Number:
Interpretation Number :
BPV Section IX Section IX, QW-103, Responsibility, and QW-201, Manufacturer's or Contractor's Responsibility 09/22/1993 BC93-584 IX-92-80
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: When a company changes names during the course of time must all the historical documents such as PQRs and WPQs be revised to show this new name?
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码,22/36
Reply: No, provided there is documented traceability from the new company name to the WPSs and PQRs qualified under the old company name. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No: Subject Description: Date Issued:
Record Number:
Interpretation Number :
BPV Section IX Section IX, QW-103.1 and QW-201, Manufacturer's or Contractor's Responsibility 10/18/1993 BC92-306 IX-92-81
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): According to Section IX, para. QW-201, is it permissible for a manufacturer or contractor to have the welding of the test weldments performed by another organization? Reply (1): No.
Question (2): According to para. QW-201, is it permissible to subcontract the work preparation of test metal for welding and subsequent work on preparation of test specimens from the completed weldment, performance of nondestructive examination, and mechanical test, provided that the manufacturer or contractor accepts the responsibility for any such work? Reply (2): Yes.
Question (3): If the manufacturer or contractor writes the WPS and the welder used to produce weldments to be tested for qualification of procedures are under full supervision and control of a representative of the manufacturer or contractor during the production of these test weldments, may the welder be an employee of another organization? Reply (3): No. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No: Subject Description: Date Issued:
Record Number:
Interpretation Number :
BPV Section IX Section IX, Code Case 2141, Electrodes and Fluxes for Submerged Arc Welding, SFA 5.17 and SFA 5.23 11/22/1993 BC93-434 IX-92-82
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): Does the "Manufacturer's Data Report" in the Section IX Code Case 2141 mean the following: (a) Manufacturer's Data Report required in PG-112 of SC I; (b) Data Report required in NCA-3770 of Section III; (c) Data Report required in UG-120 of Section VIII, Div. 2; or (d) Manufacturer's Data Reports required in AS-300 of Section VIII, Div. 2? Reply (1): A Manufacturer's Data Report form is any data report form that is required in an ASME Code Book.
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码,23/36
Question (2): Is it required to described this Code Case number on procurement and/or manufacturer's specifications and certified material test report of welding consumables? Reply (2): Section IX does not address procurement and manufacturer's specifications. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QB-415, Brazing Variables
Record Number:
BC93-527
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
11/22/1993 IX-92-83
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): Does ASME Section IX permit braze welding qualifications using the rules of Part QW, Welding? Reply (1): Yes.
Question (2): May a fabricator qualify hard-facing using the brazing variables listed in QB-415? Reply (2): No. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QB-121 and QB-123, Brazing Test Positions
Record Number:
BC93-655
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
11/22/1993 IX-92-85
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: If the test material is oriented at 15 deg. above horizontal (i.e., 75 deg. down from vertical) and the brazing filler metal flows upward by capillary action through the joint, would the brazer then be qualified for both the flat-flow and vertical-upflow positions? Reply: No.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-100.3, Welding General Requirements
Record Number:
BC93-658
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
11/22/1993 IX-92-86
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: May a hard-facing procedure qualification test that was performed in 1990 on a 1 in. thick test coupon and is used to support a
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码,24/36
welding procedure specification written in 1993 be used to deposit a hardfacing overlay on base material 1 in. to unlimited thickness?
Reply: Yes. QW-100.3 allows welding procedure specification (WPS) to be supported by procedure qualifications accomplished subsequent to 1962 without amending the WPS to include any variables required by later Editions and Addenda. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No: Subject Description: Date Issued:
Record Number:
Interpretation Number :
BPV Section IX Section IX, QW-403.6, Base Metals and QW-409.1, Electrical Characteristics 02/14/1994 BC93-151 IX-92-87
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Background: Two PQRs have been qualified to support a WPS with notch toughness requirements and having a qualified base metal thickness range from 5/16 in. to 2 in. inclusive. One PQR was qualified on 1 in. thick material with a maximum heat input of 85,000 J/in. The second was qualified on 5/16 in. thick material with a maximum heat input of 45,000 J/in. All other essential and supplementary essential variables are the same.
Question (1): Is this WPS qualified for using 85,000 J/in. max. heat input on thicknesses 5/16 in. to 2 in.? Reply (1): No.
Question (2): Is the heat input value of 85,000 J/in. applicable to base metal thicknesses between 5/8 in. to 2 in. and the heat input value of 45,000 J/in. applicable to base metal thicknesses between 5/16 in. and 5/8 in.? Reply (2): Yes. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-409.1 and QW-409.8, Electrical Characteristics
Record Number:
BC93-593
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
02/14/1994 IX-92-88
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Section IX, QW-409.8 and QW-409.1, require that the volts and amps be specified in the WPS. Does Section IX require voltage to be measured at a specific location in the welding circuit or the current to be measured using a specific type of meter (RMS, averaging or other type)? Reply: No.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
BPV Section IX
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码,25/36
Para./Fig./Table No: Subject Description: Date Issued:
Record Number:
Interpretation Number :
Section IX, QW-452.1, Groove Weld Procedure Qualification Thickness Limits and Test Specimens and QW-452.3, Groove Weld Diameter Limits 02/14/1994 BC93-653 IX-92-89
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: A welder has qualified on 3 in. O.D. 1/2 in. wall pipe in the 1G position and has also qualified on 1 in. O.D. 1/8 in. wall pipe in the 1G position. Is the welder qualified to weld 1 in. O.D. 3/8 in. wall in the 1G position? Reply: Yes.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No: Subject Description: Date Issued:
Record Number:
Interpretation Number :
BPV Section IX Section IX, QW-461.9; Performance Qualification Position and Diameter Limitations 02/14/1994 BC93-753 IX-92-90
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: A welder has passed two separate tests; one on 5/8 in. O.D. by 0.049 in. thick pipe welded in the 6G position using GTAW process, and another on 1/2 in. thick plate welded in the 1G position using GTAW process. Do these two tests in combination qualify the welder to weld pipe of unlimited diameter in all positions up to 1 in. thick using GTAW? Reply: No.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-300, General Welding Performance Qualifications
Record Number:
BC93-755
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
02/14/1994 IX-92-91
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Does Section IX prohibit making editorial corrections to welder and welding operator performance qualification records? Reply: No.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No: Subject Description:
BPV Section IX Section IX, QW-201, Manufacturer's or Contractor's Responsibility, Clarification Request to Interpretation IX-92-07 Date Issued Oct. 7, 1991, File BC91-156
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码,26/36
Date Issued:
05/20/1994
Interpretation Number :
IX-92-92
Record Number:
BC93-678
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): Is the term "Organization" as stated in QW-201 and "Company A" in Interpretation IX-92-07 one and the same? Reply (1): No.
Background: Two companies are contracted by a client company to undertake pipe work installation on its facility. All stages of the Welding Procedure Qualification Processes for the two contracted companies are witnessed by the client companies representative and the documentation duly stamped and signed as accepted by the client. Question (2): May these procedures be used by the client company? Reply (2): No.
Question (3): Does the client company have to requalify these procedures in order to perform in-house maintenance at a later date using all the same essential and nonessential variables with its own qualified welders? Reply (3): Yes. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No: Subject Description: Date Issued:
Record Number:
Interpretation Number :
BPV Section IX Section IX, QB-402.1, Brazing Data and Appendix C - Nonmandatory S-Numbers 05/20/1994 BC93-752 IX-92-93
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): Does the brazing procedure qualification test with a base metal assigned one S-Number, or S-Number plus Group-Number, qualify for all other base metals in the same S-Number grouping? Reply (1): Yes.
Question (2): Does the brazing procedure qualification test with dissimilar metals using one metal listed in one S-Number to one specific metal not listed in one S or P-Number qualify for the brazing of all other base metals in the same S-Number to themselves and to the specific base metal without S or P-Number? Reply (2): Yes. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section II, Part C, SFA-5.8
Record Number:
BC93-754
Date Issued:
05/20/1994
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码,27/36
Interpretation Number :
IX-92-94
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: May AWS Classification BAg-34 be considered SFA-5.8 filler metal even though it does not appear in the 1992 ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section II, Part C (including the 1992 Addenda)? Reply: Yes.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-200, General Welding Procedure Qualifications
Record Number:
BC94-008
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
05/20/1994 IX-92-95
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: May a single WPS be qualified both with PWHT and without PWHT (two PQRs), thereby allowing the WPS to be used with or without PWHT? Reply: Yes.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-300, General Welding Performance Qualifications
Record Number:
BC94-102
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
05/20/1994 IX-92-96
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Background: A welder is qualified on a NPS 2 Sch. 40 pipe test coupon using GTAW 1.6 mm deposited weld metal and SMAW 2.4 mm deposited weld metal. Question (1): Is the SMAW portion of the performance qualification considered welding with backing? Reply (1): Yes.
Question (2): Is the welder qualified to weld NPS 4 single welded groove weld without backing using the SMAW process only? Reply (2): No. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-200.4(a), Combination of Welding Procedures
Record Number:
BC94-167
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
05/20/1994 IX-92-97
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码,28/36
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: According to QW-200.4(a), when a qualified WPS for a combination process is available, must a new WPS be generated if only one of the processes is to be used in production, provided all requirements of Section IX for the process used are met? Reply: No.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, Appendix C, Nonmandatory S-Numbers
Record Number:
BC94-236
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
05/20/1994 IX-92-98
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: May steel produced to ASTM A-108 Grade 1018, UNS G10180, be considered S-1 material? Reply: Yes.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No: Subject Description: Date Issued:
Record Number:
Interpretation Number :
BPV Section IX Section IX, QW-432.6, F-Numbers and Section II, Part C, SFA-5.29, 1992 Addenda 06/10/1994
BC93-762 and BC93-769 IX-92-99
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: May AWS 5.24 ER Zr4 be considered as an F-No. 61 filler metal? Reply: Yes.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No: Subject Description: Date Issued:
Record Number:
Interpretation Number :
BPV Section IX Section IX, QW-200.1(b), General Welding Procedure Qualifications and QW-402.4, Joints 09/21/1994 BC94-104 IX-95-01
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: If a WPS states that the GTAW process shall be used on root and second pass of open root or metal backed groove joints and the SMAW process shall be used on the remainder of the groove joint, is it necessary to state that the SMAW portion of the WPS must be performed with backing (i.e., the GTAW process)? Reply: No.
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码,29/36
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-462, Test Specimens
Record Number:
BC94-181
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
09/21/1994 IX-95-02
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: What are the minimum and maximum tolerances for specimens shown in QW-462, where the figures show "approximate" dimensions?
Reply: As stated in the Foreword, "The Code does not fully address tolerances. When dimensions, sizes, or other parameters are not specified with tolerances, the values of these parameters are considered nominal and allowable tolerance or local variances may be considered acceptable when based on engineering judgment and standard practices as determined by the designer."
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No: Subject Description: Date Issued:
Record Number:
Interpretation Number :
BPV Section IX Section IX, QW-202.2(b), Groove and Fillet Weld Tests and QW-202.3(b), Weld Repair and Buildup Tests 09/21/1994 BC94-235 IX-95-03
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Background: Procedure Qualification was performed by making a full penetration weld on 1½ in. thick plate. Paragraph QW-202.2(b) states that qualification on 1½ in. or thicker base metal qualifies for making partial penetration welds on base metals with no upper limit of base metal thickness. No minimum thickness of base metal is addressed.
Question (1): Does qualification of 1½ in. thick base metal qualify for making partial penetration groove welds on base metals which are less than 3/16 in. thick? Reply (1): No. See para. QW-451.1 for minimum base metal thicknesses.
Background: Procedure qualification was performed by making a full penetration weld on 1½ in. thick plate. Paragraph QW-202.3(b) states that qualification on 1½ in. thick or thicker base metal qualifies for making weld repairs or weld build-ups on base metals of unlimited thickness. Question (2): Does qualification on 1½ in. base metal qualify for making weld repairs or weld build-ups on base metals which are less than 3/16 in. thick? Reply (2): No. See para. QW-451.1 for minimum base metal thicknesses. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
BPV Section IX
Para./Fig./Table No:
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码,30/36
Subject Description: Date Issued:
Record Number:
Interpretation Number :
Section IX, QW-452.3, Groove Weld Diameter Limits and Submerged Arc Wire Flux Combination 09/21/1994 BC94-296 IX-95-04
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): According to para. QW-452.3 is the inside diameter an essential variable for performance qualification? Reply (1): No.
Background: A WPS for SAW process was qualified with a wire flux combination classified as F6P0-EL8, using one trade name for flux. This WPS was in use for several years. Now the flux manufacturer has changed the classification to F7P2-EL8 without changing the trade name of flux. The flux trade name is mentioned on the WPS and PQR along with the former AWS classification. Question (2): Is it required to requalify this WPS due to the change in the AWS class of the wire flux combination by the flux manufacturer without changing its Trade Name? Reply (2): Yes. See para. QW-404.9(a). Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-422, P-Numbers
Record Number:
BC94-365
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
09/21/1994 IX-95-05
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: May SB-564 UNS N08825 be considered as P-No. 45, since it has identical properties to SB-425 UNS N08825 that is assigned P-No. 45 in QW-422? Reply: No.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-153.1, Tension Tests
Record Number:
BC94-542
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
09/21/1994 IX-95-06
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: If a tensile specimen breaks in the weld metal, below the weld metal's minimum specified tensile requirement, but not below the minimum tensile strength specified for the base metal, is the PQR considered acceptable? Reply: Yes.
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码,31/36
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-420.2, S-Numbers
Record Number:
BC94-522
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
03/17/1995 IX-95-07
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: When qualifying a welding procedure using S1 group 2 for API 5LX60 pipe joining to MSS SP-75 or ASTM A860 WPHY-65 fittings, or when joining WPHY-60 fittings to each other, is it permissible to use the corresponding S-Number for the fitting as the same grade of high strength pipe when the physical properties are similar? Reply: No.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-462.4(a), Fillet Weld Procedure
Record Number:
BC94-543
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
03/17/1995 IX-95-08
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): When T2 is greater than 3/4 in. in Fig. QW-462.4(a), what is the maximum size fillet weld required? Reply (1): 3/4 in.
Question (2): In QW-462.4(a), what does "size of fillet = thickness of T2" mean? Reply (2): The length of each fillet leg(s) shall be nominally equal to the thickness of T2. Question (3): Is there a tolerance for the fillet leg size?
Reply (3): No. As stated in the 1992 Addenda to the Foreword, when tolerances are not specified, dimensions are considered nominal and allowable tolerances or local variances may be considered acceptable when based on engineering judgement and standard practices as determined by the designer. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-153, Acceptance Criteria--Tension Tests
Record Number:
BC94-570
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
Question(s) and Reply(ies):
03/17/1995 IX-95-09
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码,32/36
Question: When welds between base metals of different minimum specified tensile strengths are being tested and tensile failure occurs in either of the base metals, does the reference to base metal within QW-153.1(d) mean the base metal with the lower minimum specified tensile strength? Reply: Yes. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-200.4, Combination of Welding Procedures
Record Number:
BC94-662
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
03/17/1995 IX-95-10
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: May a single process WPS be qualified by a combination process PQR where no essential variables for the process are changed? Reply: Yes.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-408, Gas
Record Number:
BC95-002
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
03/17/1995 IX-95-11
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Is it required to indicate the purity level by percent composition or descriptive terms of a single shielding gas on the WPS and on the PQR? Reply: No.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-202.4, Dissimilar Base Metal Thicknesses
Record Number:
BC95-027
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
03/17/1995 IX-95-12
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Does QW-202.4 include butt joints and corner joints when joining dissimilar base metal thicknesses when prepared with a groove? Reply: Yes.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
BPV Section IX
Para./Fig./Table No:
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码,33/36
Subject Description: Date Issued:
Record Number:
Interpretation Number :
Section IX, 1989 Addenda, QW-203, Limits of Qualified Positions for Procedures Section II Part C, 1989 Addenda, SFA 5.1 and 5.5 06/15/1995 BC94-035 IX-95-13
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Do the requirements for classification of filler metals in accordance with ASME Section II Part C apply to the qualification of welding and brazing procedures in accordance with Section IX? Reply: No.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-300.3, Welding Performance Qualifications
Record Number:
BC95-040
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
06/15/1995 IX-95-14
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Are there any circumstances under which a non-employee person or organization can represent one or more participating organizations during welding of the test coupon in accordance with the requirements of QW300.3? Reply: No.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-160, Guided-Bend Tests and QW-466 Note (b)- Test Jigs
Record Number:
BC95-094
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
06/15/1995 IX-95-15
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Is it acceptable to measure the percent elongation of the tensile specimens in lieu of bend specimens to measure the ductility for welding procedure qualification acceptance? Reply: No.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No: Subject Description: Date Issued:
Record Number:
Interpretation Number :
BPV Section IX Section IX, QW-255, Welding Variables Procedure Specifications for FCAW and QW- 408.2, Gas 06/15/1995 BC95-095 IX-95-16
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码,34/36
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: May a FCAW welding procedure qualified without shielding gas, be used with a shielding gas without requalification? Reply: No.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-302.4, Visual Examination
Record Number:
BC95-035
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
10/19/1995 IX-95-17
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): For the fillet weld coupon in welder performance qualification, does the macro examination required per QW-452.5 exempt the visual examination required per QW-302.4? Reply (1): No.
Question (2): Does the visual examination of the fillet weld test coupon required per QW-302.4 refer to the final weld face side only? Reply (2): Yes. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-409.8, Electrical Characteristics
Record Number:
BC95-220
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
10/19/1995 IX-95-18
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Does Section IX require that a separate amperage range be specified for each filler metal size listed in the WPS? Reply: No.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No: Subject Description: Date Issued:
Record Number:
Interpretation Number :
BPV Section IX Section IX, QW-300.3, Welding Performance Qualifications and QW-322.1 (b), Expiration of Welder Qualification 10/19/1995 BC95-221 IX-95-19
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Background: A welder simultaneously qualifies for ten different contractors in accordance with QW-300.3. QW-300.3 requires the contractor that rejects a welder to notify the other contractors who participated in the simultaneous test that the welder's qualification has been revoked. One of the contractors subsequently revokes the welder's qualification for specific
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码,35/36
reason in accordance with QW-322.1(b). Question (1): Are the other nine contractors who qualified the welder simultaneously required to revoke the welder's qualification per QW-322.1(b)? Reply (1): No.
Question (2): When a participating contractor revokes a welder's qualification for specific reason, does QW-300.3 require the other participating contractors to retest the welder or welding operator? Reply (2): No. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-300, Welding Performance Qualification
Record Number:
BC95-302
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
10/19/1995 IX-95-20
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: If the manufacturer or contractor writes the WPS and the welder used to produce the weldments to be tested for qualification of procedures is under the full supervision and control of the manufacturer or contractor during the production of these test weldments, may the welder be a contracted employee, provided the Quality Control system or Quality Assurance Program of the manufacturer or contractor describes the control of contracted welders? Reply: Yes.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-403.5, Base Metals
Record Number:
BC95-318
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
10/19/1995 IX-95-21
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Background: A PQR is qualified in accordance with Section IX, with supplementary essential variables, using a material from British Standard 1501-224-490A-LT50.
Question: May this PQR be used to support a WPS utilizing a P-Number 1, Group Number 2 material with supplementary essential variables? Reply: No.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No: Subject Description:
BPV Section IX Section IX, QW-424, Base Metals Used for Procedure Qualification
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码,36/36
Date Issued:
12/28/1995
Interpretation Number :
IX-95-22
Record Number:
BC95-251
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Does a procedure qualification using an unassigned metal to an assigned P-numbered metal qualify for welding the base metals to themselves using all the nonessential, essential, and supplementary essential variables qualified? Reply: No.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No: Subject Description: Date Issued:
Record Number:
Interpretation Number :
BPV Section IX Section IX, QW-453 Notes (3) and (10), Thickness Limits and Test Specimens for Hard-Facing and Corrosion-Resistant Overlays 12/28/1995 BC95-428 IX-95-23
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): Notes (3) and (10) of QW-453 require a liquid penetrant examination of the surface of the test coupon for hardfacing procedure and performance qualifications respectively. May the acceptance standards of QW-195.2 or other standards deemed appropriate by the qualifying organization be used as acceptance criteria? Reply (1): Yes.
Question (2): Must the acceptance criteria be specified on the WPS? Reply (2): Yes.
Copyright © 2016 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4