A. Object Objective ive of Rese Researc arch: h: . . . . . P!ace P!ace a"# a"# Ti$ Ti$e e of Resear Research ch C. Rese Resear arch ch Meth Metho# o#:: The research used an experimental method in which the independent variable was . . . .; and the dependent variable was . . . .. The independent variable (experiment) was implemented through teaching using . . . method and the control variable (learning result) classified into the achievement in . . . D. Rese Resear arch ch Des Desi% i%" " This research used a true experimental design in Pretest-Posttest Control Group tpe. Through this tpe of design! the two randomi"ed sub#ects! experimental and control groups! were given a pre-test and post test. The pre-test was given in order to investigate whether there were significant differences between the experimental and control group. $owever! after the pre-test! the experimental group were given treatment through teaching using . . . method; while the control group were not. The effect of the treatment was seen using the form% (&' &) (&* &+). The design of research can be illustrated as follows% Group ( ) ( )
/xperiment Control
Pre-Test
,ependent ariable
Post Test
&
0
&'
&+
-
&*
D. Po&'! Po&'!ati atio" o" a"# a"# Sa$& Sa$&!e !e The population of this research was . . . .. The research sample was . . . The sampling of this research used random sampling techni1ue. andom sampling can be defined as a techni1ue of sampling without considering the strata of the members due to the fact that the members (respondents) of this research were categori"ed homogeneous. The sample of the research is figured as follows% 2tudents 3 4 5 5
Total 5
E. Data( So'rc So'rce e of Data( a"# a"# Data Co!!ect Co!!ecti"% i"% Tech Tech"i) "i)'e 'e The data of this research were 1uantitative data% all scores of tests given both to the experimental and control group. To collect the data! the researcher prepared test instruments! pre-test and post test. The data were collected from the wor6s of the students . . .. Conse1uentl! the data were collected using test techni1ue. G. Data Data Co!!ec Co!!ectio tio" " Proce# Proce#'r 'res es The data were collected using the following procedures%
. . . . '. . . . +. . . . *.
+a!i#it, a"# Re!iabi!it, To test the hpothesis the researcher tested the instrument to see the validit and reliabilit! in this case the test items. 4ased on . . . number of students! there were . . . items of test were categori"ed valid. The validit test used 7product moment correlation8 techni1ues. Then! the result (r-product) was compared to the r-table (. . .) in significance level 9.9:. f r-product is greater than the r-table! the items of the instrument are valid; and in verse. 3n instrument is reliable if the instrument is consistent in measuring what is measured. n this research the reliabilit test used Cronbach Alpha coefficient using the SPSS Version . . . for Windows. 3n instrument is reliable when < r-table. ˃
G. Data A"a!,sis Tech"i)'e 3nal"ing data is an important stage in a research. 3fter data are collected! the data should be anal"ed using a techni1ue concerned with the research method. 2ince this research was 1uantitative (experimental)! the researcher used the 1ualitative (descriptive statistics) and 1uantitative analsis (3nalsis of ariance =3>?3@) techni1ues. ,escriptive techni1ue is used to describe the sub#ects through the sample. n this research the descriptive techni1ues was used to describe the tendenc of the respondents towards the independent variable concerned with the implementation of method . . . in teaching . . . to students . . . . 3>?3! in this case two wa 3>?3 was used to test the hpothesis. To implement this techni1ue! the researcher used the following t-test! formulated as% t A r
√ n−1
√ 1
❑
2
−r
r A 6oef. egresi n A #umlah responden t A u#i hipotesis
