Law School Case Digest Angeles vs Santos Corporation LawFull description
Agency case
Case digest
agencyFull description
Full description
CASE DIGEST
digest
15. Cruz vs SalvaFull description
digest
People vs Dela Cruz Case digest criminal law 1 article 11Full description
Crim Pro Digest
Case Digest for Law SchoolFull description
Constitutional Law/Administrative Law Case Digest Ex-officio; Executive Department; Cabinet
case digest election lawFull description
OBLICON CASEFull description
case digestFull description
case digest
Comelec vs Cruz, Political Law, Constitutional law, digest
Labor Realtions
Malayan Insurance vs Cruz-Arnaldo insurance caseFull description
Un librito muy interesante sobre los ángeles.Descripción completa
A.C. No. 11113, August 09, 2016 - CLEO B. DONGGA-AS, Complainant, v. ATTY. ROSE BEATRIX CRUZ-ANGELES, ATTY. WYLIE M. PALER, AND ATTY. ANGELES GRANDEA, OF THE ANGELES, GRANDEA & PALER LAW OFFICE, Respondent. FACTS:
In May 2004, complainant engaged the law firm of respondents to handle
the annulment of his marriage. From then on, he constantly followed-up its progress but respondents were unable to produce a petition , with various excuses including that there was no record of marriage. Utterly frustrated with the delay, complainant decided to terminate their engagement and demanded for a refund of the amount he paid. To the complainant's surprise, they responded by sending two (2) billing statements in the amounts of P258,000.00 and P324,000.00. Thus, he filed a complaint. ISSUE:
Whether or not the respondents should be held administratively liable for
violating the CPR. HELD.
Yes. Despite the passage of more than five (5) months from the engagement,
respondents failed to file the appropriate pleading to initiate the case before the proper court. Such neglect of the legal matter entrusted to them by their client constitutes a flagrant violation of Rule 18.03, Canon 18 of the CPR, to wit: CANON 18-A LAWYER SHALL SERVE HIS CLIENT WITH COMPETENCE AND DILIGENCE. Rule 18.03 -A lawyer shall not neglect a legal matter entrusted to him, and his negligence in connection therewith shall render him liable.
