HOW CRIMINALISED CHRISTIAN MISSIONARIES ARE ABUSING TAMIL PRIDE AND CULTURE A Bas Bastar tard d chr christ istian ian Dei Deivana vanayag yagam am,, wr wrot ote e a bo book ok ti titl tled ed,, `Vivliyam (Bible (Bi ble), ), Thi Thiruk rukku kural ral,, Sai Saiva va Sid Siddan dantha tham m - Opp Oppu u Ayvu (Co (Compa mparati rative ve Research)',, wh Research)' whic ich h wa was s pu publ blis ishe hed d in 19 1985 85-8 -86 6 by th the e `International Instit Ins titute ute of Tami amill Stu Studie dies', s', Ad Adaya ayar, r, Mad Madras ras as a del delibe iberat rate e act of conni co nnivan vance ce.. De Deiv ivan anay ayag agam am wa was s al also so aw awar arde ded d a Do Doct ctor orat ate e by th the e University of Madras run by the Tamil Bastards who call themselves Dravidians. Deivanayagam says that Thiruvalluvar was a Christian and a disciple of the so-called fake St.Thomas. Of course Pope says that Thomas Thomas neve neverr came came to India. India. Chr Christ istian ianity ity was was a fake fake re relig ligion ion and and Jesus Christ was created c reated by a committee in AD325
Baptising' Thiruvalluva Thiruvalluvarr to `besiege' the Hindus! By: B R HARAN \\ http://newstodaynet.com/col.php?section=20&catid=29&id= 8961
`History is always written by the victors and whoever controls the writing of history books control the past. Without doubt, the most consistently powerful force in the western world over the last two thousand years has been the Roman Catholic Church and consequently history has often been what it wanted to be'. George Orwell in his novel `1984'. (Thamizhaga Anthanar Varalaaru _ History Brahmins of Tamil Nadu - Vol-II-Page599).
of
As ri righ ghtl tly y exp xpre ress ssed ed in tho those se im immo morta rtall wo word rds s by Ge Geor orge ge Orwell, the Indians have been fed with distorted history by the West ester ern n Chri Christi stian an eli elite te bef befor ore e ind indepe epende ndence nce and the same has been continued even after independence, thanks to the takeover of the nation's history by the Marxists and
Christ Chri stia ian n st stoo ooge ges, s, wh who o co cont ntin inue ued d th the e da dark rk an and d si sini nist ster er legacy of Max Mueller and McCauley. As an important part of the pe perv rver erte ted d hi hist stor ory, y, wh whic ich h wa was s pl plan ante ted d by th the e we west ster ern n schola sch olars, rs, the so-c so-call alled ed St. St.Tho Thomas mas's 's arr arriva ival, l, lif life e and de death ath werre thrus we ustt on Sout uth h India. This th thrrust gave a solid foundation to the Church to claim as if Christianity was also an indigenous religion. As brilliantly shown in these columns by Mr.Sundaram for the last four days, many attempts have been made at regular intervals to impose the concocted history of Thomas on the people, thereby removing the facts from their minds, about the persecution of Hindus and destroying of Hindu Temples by the Chr Christ istian ian inv invade aders rs (P (Portu ortugue guese, se, Fre rench nch and Bri Britis tish) h) from the fifteenth century onwards. One su One suc ch at atte temp mpt, t, in th the e lin ine e of of Arulappa Arulappa and Acharya Paul,, was made by a writer by name Deivanayagam Paul Deivanayagam,, who wrote a book titled, `Vivliyam (Bible), Thirukkural, Saiva Sidda Sid dant ntha ham m - Op Oppu pu Ayvu (C (Com ompa para rati tive ve Re Resea searc rch)' h)',, whiich was published in 1985-86 by none other tha wh han n the `International Institute of Tamil Studies', Adayar, Madras, ei eithe therr wi with thout out an any y ap appl plic icati ation on of mi mind nd,, or or,, as a deliberate act of connivance. Shockingly Deivanayagam was also awarded a Doctorate by the University of Madras. Deivanayagam had predetermined to conclude his hi s bo boo ok wi with th a fin indi ding ng th that at Th Thir iruv uva all lluv uvar ar wa was s a Chris Ch ristia tian n an and d a di disci scipl ple e of th the e so so-ca -calle lled d St. St.Th Thom omas as and most of the Saiva Sidhantha and the vivid knowledge found in Thiruklural were nothing but the sayi sa ying ngs s of Th The e Bi Bibl ble. e. In or orde derr to ac achi hiev eve e th this is de devi viou ous s motive, he distorted and misinterpreted the verses of Kural and Shi Shivit vite e Phi Philos losoph ophica icall Works and com comple pleted ted the boo book. k. Later on, Tamil and Shivite scholars protested against this and an d th the e `Dhar `Dharmapura mapuram m Adheena Adheenam' m',, a fa famo mous us Shi hivi vite te Mutt, came out with a book of refutation written by Tamil Shivite Shivit e Schol Scholar ar Aru Arunai nai Vadi adivel vel Mud Mudalia aliarr an and d re rele leas ased ed it amongst a congregation of eminent Scholars, who strongly criticized Deivanayagam for his perversion of history. This was do done ne ma main inly ly to pr prev even entt the us usag age e of su such ch de dece ceit itful ful
materials by the future generations for research activities. (Ref: www.hamsa.org _ Ishvar Sharan) The planting of the so-called St.Thomas's story was not only to have a foundation for Christianity in India, butt al bu also so to sp spre read ad it th thro roug ugh h ou outt th the e co coun untr try y. This fabrication succeeded slightly, over the years, in the areas of Madras, Nagappatinam and Pondicherry, mainly because of the fact that the `Kapaleeshwarar Temple', Mylapore,`Vel Nagap app patti tina nam m Ilankanni Amman Temple' near and `V ndiiche herrry were `Veda edapu pure rees eshw hwar arar ar Tem empl ple' e', Pond destroyed and Santhome Basilica, Velankanni and Church (Our Lady of Health Basilica) the Cathedral of Our Lady of the Immaculate Conception, Pondicherry were built on their remains respectively. Well kno known wn scho scholar lars s of Arc Archeo heolog logy y hav have e establi esta blished shed tha thatt, th the e de deta tail ils s of th the e de dest stru ruct ctio ion n of originalKa be found Kapa palee leesh shwar warar ar Tem empl ple e could in Tamil inscriptions on the w a lls of theMarundeeswa Thiruvanmiyur, warrar Temple in Chennai, even today! But, the glorious religious tradition and cultural heritage of Sanat Sa natana ana Dh Dhar arma ma ha had d be been en so hug hugel ely y es esta tabl blis ishe hed d th that, at, despite the cooperation from the Dravidian racists, Marxists and an d th the e En Engl glis ish h la lang ngua uage ge me medi dia, a, th the e Ca Cath thol olic ic Di Dioc oces ese e couldn't expand beyond a certain limit. As a result, it started indu in dulg lgin ing g in `inculturation' me meth thod ods s (s (saf affr fron on dr dres essi sing ng,, paad pa aday ayaa aatra tra,, ca call lling ing`S `San antho thome me Ma Mary ry'' as `Thirumayilai Annai',, giving sugar-rice as prashaad, etc) to confuse and Annai' win over the gullible masses. At this juncture, fell on its head like a `bolt from the blue', the categorical statement from Pope Benedict that the so-cal so-called led St.Thomas never ever visited India! This res resoun ounding ding stat stateme ement nt fro from m the Pa Papac pacy y, whic which h shocked the Catholic community, had shaken the very foundation of Christianity in South India! As the Papacy didn't bother to listen to the Indian Catholic community and their protests, the Madras and Cochin Bishops met in Cochin,
Kerala during the second week of June 2008, to find out ways and means of reestablishing the history of the so-called St. Thomas. As a step in that direction, the Archdiocese of Santhome, Madras, decided to produce a feature film on the so-called St.Thomas the Apostle of India, at a cost of Rs.50 Crore in the banner of `St.Thomas of `St.Thomas Apostle of India Trust', Trust', which has Archbishop A.M.Chinappa, Deputy Archbishop Lawrence Pius Pi us,, Tre reas asur urer er of the Di Dioc oces ese e Mr Mr.E .Ern rnes estt Paul an and d Sc Scri ript pt Writer Dr.Paulraj Lourdusamy as office bearers. The movie will be presenting the life and times of the so-called St.Thomas in South India in general and Madras in part pa rtic icul ular ar.. Th The e fi film lm wi will ll ha have ve ce cert rtai ain n su supp ppos osed edly ly important events like the alleged meeting between Tho between Thomas mas and Tami amill Sag Sage e Thir Thiruva uvalluva lluvarr, the establishment of Santhome Cathedral and the alleged killing of Thomas by a Hindu Brahmin Priest. Priest. The st stor ory y of Thi Thiru rukk kkur ural al co conta ntaini ining ng Bi Bibl blica icall ve vers rses es was first concocted by G.U.Pope, a Christian Missionary, who learnt Tamil and translated the Tamil Liter Li terar ary y wo work rks s suc such h as Thir Thiruvach uvachagam, agam, Naalad Naaladiyaar iyaar ngli lish sh.. Th The e mis issi sion ona ari ries es li lik ke and Th Thiru irukku kkural ral in Eng G.U. G. U.Po Pope pe,, Jo Jose seph ph Be Besk sky y (w (who ho to took ok a Tam amil il na nam me `Vee `V eera rama maa a Mu Muni niva var' r')) an and d Ca Cald ldwe well ll ha have ve a mo modu dus s oper op era and ndii of le lear arni ning ng th the e na nati tive ve la lang ngua uage ge wi with th a motive of distorting history to suit their missionary agendas. The Dravidian racist political party, which always thrived on the bogus Aryan Invasion theory, took immense sati sa tisf sfac acti tion on in gl glori orify fyin ing g the these se mi miss ssio iona nari ries es by er erec ecti ting ng statues for them along the Marina Beach when it ruled Tamil Nad Na du in th the e la late te si sixt xtie ies s an and d ear arly ly se seve vent ntie ies, s, th the ereb eby y exhibiting its unholy connection with Christian missionaries. No wo wond nder er,, th the e Ho Hono nour urab able le Ch Chie ieff Mi Mini nist ster er Kar arun unan anit ithi hi inaugurated this 50 crore movie-magnum on the so-called St.Thomas!
G.U.Pope lived up to the true tradition of Christian missi mi ssion onar arie ies, s, by te telli lling ng th that at Th Thiru iruva vall lluva uvarr liv lived ed in Madras between 800 and 1000 years after the birth of Chris istt! The Tamils never bought this sto torry and laug la ughe hed d at it it.. As per the available records it is believe bel ieved d tha thatt Thir Thiruva uvalluv lluvar ar cou could ld have liv lived ed dur during ing the th e second cent ntu ury base sed d on th the e evi vid dence that `Thirukkural' was included in the group called Pat athin hinen en Ke Keez ezh h Ka Kana nakk kku u (E (Eig ighte hteen en lit liter erar ary y wor works ks)) during the `Kadai Sangam' (Last Sangam) days. days . Those days, there was a literary-grammatical procedure by which the author would always make it a point to convey to the readers the identification of his Teacher (Guru) and Patron apart from his own personal details such as name, native plac pl ace, e, wo wors rshi hipp ppin ing g de deit ity, y, et etc. c. Bu Butt Thi Thiruk rukk kura urall sa sans ns su such ch detail det ails, s, and hen hence, ce, the con connec nectio tion n bet betwee ween n Thi Thiruva ruvallu lluvar var and Thomas is a mere figment of imagination. Whereas, a look at many other literary works written after the second century, say for example Kamba Ramayanam, or Periya Puraanam, could lead to the mentioning of Thirukkural or its philosophy in them and none of them would have any information about a religion called Christianity. The glorious rule of Raja Raja Chola was during the 10 century and there was wa s no tr trac ace e of Ch Chri rist stia iani nity ty th then en!! Al Also so th the e San anth thom ome e Cath Ca thed edra rall ha had d th the e in insc scri ript ptio ions ns of Raj ajen endr dra a Ch Chol ola a of th the e eleventh century on its corridor walls! Then what meeting is this Archdiocese talking about between Thiruvalluvar and the so-called St.Thomas? Even the Ch Even Chie ieff Mi Mini nist ster er du duri ring ng hi his s sp spee eech ch at th the e inaugur inau gurati ation on func functio tion, n, has not men mention tioned ed any anythin thing g abou ab outt the all lleg eged ed me meet etin ing g bet etwe ween en Th Thom oma as and Thiruvalluvar. It is a well-known fact that, Karunanidhi, himself being a Tamil Scholar and well vers ve rsed ed wi with th Tam amil il li lite tera rary ry wo work rks, s, ha had d wr writ itte ten n hi his s masterpiece `Kuraloviyam' on Thirukkural. As he had not ta talk lked ed an anyth ything ing ab abou outt th the e co conne nnecti ction on be betw twee een n the B ib le and Thirukkural or Thomas and Thiruvalluvar at the inaugural function of the movie,
it be beco come mes s ob obvi viou ous s th that at th the e `T `Tho homa mas s st stor ory' y' is an absolute falsehood! But, he has waxed eloquent on the supposed killing of the so-called St.Thomas at the hands of a Hindu Brahmin Priest and went on to say that th at th the e pa part rtic icul ular ar sc scen ene e al alon one e is en enou ough gh fo forr th the e success of the movie! But For this (Thomas's killing) also, the Church doesn't have even an iota of evidence. At this juncture, it can be recalled that the Honourable Chief Mini Mi nist ster er ha had d rec ecen entl tly y qu ques esti tion oned ed th the e tr trut uth h of Bh Bhag agwa wan n Rama, historicity of Ramayana and existence of Rama Sethu, despite the availability of so much of archeological, literary, cultural, numismatic, geographical and historical evidences. But, he has not exhibited the courage to questio ques tion n the hist histori oricity city of the soso-cal called led St.T St.Thoma homas, s, despite being aware of the fact that there is absolutely no iota of evidence. The Honourable Chief Minister, who is a well-known expert in Thirukkural, has unfortunately not felt it important to ascertain the truth of the so-called metering between Thomas and Thiruvalluvar, but conveniently left it untouched at the inauguration function. Though the people are aware of the Chief Minister's hostile stand against the majority community, it doesn't augur well for him to open op enly ly pa pand nder er th the e mi mino nori rity ty co comm mmun unit ity y ac acce cept ptin ing g their devious machinations. The Archdiocese talks of three vital places in Madras namely Santhom San thome e (My (Mylap lapore ore), ), Lit Little tle Mou Mount nt (Sa (Saida idape pet) t) and Tho Thoms ms Mount (Brungi Malai). While Santhome Cathedral stands on the ruins of Kapali Temple, Little Mount was also built after demolishing a Temple and the Church on the Big Mount was also built on the ruins of a Temple. The Big Mount was called as `Brungi Malai' named after `Brungi Maharishi', who sat in penance there invoking Bhag Bh agwa wan n Sh Shiva iva se seek ekin ing g hi his s Da Dars rsha han n an and d Bl Bles essin sing. g. Ultim Ult imat ately ely Bh Bhag agwan wan Sh Shiva iva ap appe pear ared ed be befo fore re Br Brung ungii Munivar as `Nandeeshwara' and as clear evidence the `Avu `A vuda daii Na Naya yagi gi Sa Same meth tha a Na Nand ndee eesh shwa wara ra Tem empl ple' e'
stands stan ds ne near ar th the e St St.T .Tho homa mas s Ra Rail ilwa way y St Stat atio ion, n, fr from om where whe re on one e co could uld se see e the Br Brung ungii Ma Mala laii cle clear arly ly.. Thi This s `Stal puraanaa' can be found in the form of inscriptions on the walls of the Nandeeshwara Temple even ev en to toda day! y! Ev Even en wh whil ile e th the e Ar Arch chdi dioc oces ese e ha has s be been en attempting to establish the fallacy of St.Thomas over the years, it has not exhibited the courage so far to face a public debate despite invitations from learned Tamil Hindu scholars. The The Ar Arch chdi dioc oces ese e ha has s th the e fr free eedo dom m of exp xpre ress ssio ion n an and d th the e freedom of religion to propagate its faith, but it cannot be done at th the e cost of othe herr religious fai aith th.. Freedom of expression and freedom of religion cannot be used to distort history, or Christianise the icons of other religions, with a motive of belittling the other faith, which is native in all respe re spects cts and whi which ch has wel well-e l-esta stabli blishe shed d glo glorio rious us re reli ligio gious us tradition and cultural heritage spanning thousands of years even before the birth of Christianity. Thrusting of falsehood on th the e gul ulli libl ble e ma mass sses es ca cann nnot ot be al allo lowe wed. d. It is no nott to too o difficult to understand the aims and objectives of the Madras Archdiocese behind this movie project. So, it would be better for them to understand the sensitivity attached with this project, as they have a social responsibility. The government must also ensure that history is not distorted and the people are not repeatedly fed with fabrications and fallacies. It would be appropriate to conclude with the sensible and coura rag geous words of Dr. Sub ubrram ama ani nia am Swa wam my, `The Church will have to go, and the Kapaleeshwara Temple re-built re-built on that site. Hindus will do it with the help he lp of sa sane ne an and d ci civi vili lise sed d Chr hris isti tian ans s if po poss ssib ible le,, without them if necessary, and despite them if forced. When 83 percent Hindus unite, let those who are seeking to debase Hindu icons by bogus history realise that a religiousTsunami religiousTsunami will wash wa sh them away'.
Politics has always been interwoven with religion and history in our nation of diversity and in such a scenario, it would be better to leave this project untouched, for the sake of Unity!
