A short comprehensive digest of a case on ethicsFull description
Case Digest
Human Rights, Constitutional Law
Public Offcr & AdminFull description
Full description
Crim 1 case digestFull description
digest
Case DigestFull description
Case Digest of Enrile vs. Sandiganbayan
DigestFull description
People v. Sandiganbayan Case Digest
Digest
DIgest Poli LawFull description
.Full description
gdFull description
Criminal LAwFull description
Full text
civil action
Criminal Law - Criminal ImmunityFull description
digestFull description
graft caseFull description
Jaylo vs SandiganbayanFull description
CASE DIGEST ON LECAROZ V. SANDIGANBAYAN [305 SCRA 469 (1998)] November 10, 2010 Facts: Francisco, Mayor of Santa Cruz, Marinduque, and son Lenlie, KB chair and SB member, Lecaroz were charged with 13 counts of estafa through falsification of public documents. Alleged that Francisco did not recognize appointment of Red as new KB chair in Matalaba and SB member. Alleged that Leslie continued to receive salary even after his term has expired. Convicted by Sandiganbayan Issue: WON Lecaroz is criminally liable? Held: No. Acquitted 1. SB term: 6 yrs. If sectoral/group rep term is coterminus with sectoral term 2. KB term: till last Sunday, November 1985 or until new officers have qualified 3. Lenlie can hold over. ? Law doesn’t say he can or is prevented from doing so. Thus he can stay until succession qualifies ? Duldulao v. ramos: law abhors vacuum in public offices ? Foley v. mcnab: hold over: avoid hiatus in performance of government function ? Barnes v. Holbrook: holdover to prevent public convenience from suffering due to vacancy 4. Red not qualified. Oath administered by Batasang Pambansa member who’s not authorized to do so is invalid 5. lack of criminal intent ? appointment not recognized since there were no authenticated copies of appointment papers ? Francisco sought advice of MILG Secretary Pimentel regarding Red’s papers: Provincial Memo Circular 86-02: No authentication fr om fr om President can’t assume position; Memo-Circ. 86-17: SB, Splung, Splala: Hold office, be compensated until replaced by president or MILG ? Executive Silence on hold over for 30 yrs not equal to prohibition ? Francisco: well respected. Perhaps he just made erroneous interpretation. Mabutol v Pascual and Cabungcal v. Cordova: misrepresentation is not equal to bad faith, thus not liable ? Falsification: no document statement from offended to narrate facts and facts were not proven wrong or false. ? Conspiracy not proven: should be established separately for crime and must meet same degree of proof
?
Strong enough to show community of criminal design
