Facts only of CIRTEK for Parol Evidence Rule, Evidence, Rules of Court
StatCon
G Holdings vsFull description
Labor Relations
Full description
SoundtrackFull description
Description complète
Victoriano vs. Elizalde Rope Workers Union_digest
Labor case
Full description
digest
SugarDescription complète
case digestFull description
digest
easurer of Orm
digest
Veraguth vs. Isabela Sugar Co., Inc. G.R. No. L-37064, October 4, 1932 Case Digest Business Organizations II Corporation LawFull description
Handbook of Cane Sugar EngineeringFull description
Andriessen workers union scoreFull description
Handbook of Cane Sugar EngineeringDescrição completa
NATIONAL FEDERATION OF SUGAR WORKERS (NFSW), petitioner, vs. ETHELWOLDO R. OVEJERA, CENTRAL AZUCARERA DE LA CARLOTA (CAC), COL. ROGELIO DEINLA, as Provincial Commander, 3311st P.C. Command, Negros Occidental, respondents.
FACTS:
Petitioner, the bargaining representative of Central Azucarera de la Carlota (CAC) employees entered into collective bargaining agreement with CAC wherein the parties agreed to maintain the present practice on the grant of Christmas bonus, milling bonus and amelioration bonus equivalent to 1 1/2 month's salary. On November 30, 1981, petitioner and respondent CAC entered into a compromise agreement two days after the petition struck to compel payment of the 13th month pay agreeing to abide by the final decision of the Supreme Court in any case involving the 13th month pay if it clearly held that the employer is liable to pay the same separate and distinct from the bonuses already given. Meanwhile, G.R. No. 51254, Petition for Certiorari and Prohibition filed by Marcopper Mining Corporation which sought to annul the decision of the Labor Deputy Minister granting the 13th month pay to its employees in addition to mid-year and Christmas bonuses under a CBA was dismissed on June 11, 1981 on the vote of seven (7) Justices and the motion for its reconsideration was denied by a vote of five Justices. Thereafter, petitioner struck after six days notice with the Ministry of Labor and Employment (MOLE). One day after the commencement of the strike, petitioner filed a strike vote report with MOLE . The strike was declared illegal by respondent Ovejera for violation of the 15 day cooling-off period and the 7 day strike ban required by B.P. 130. Without appealing to the NLRC, the present petition was filed questioning the declaration of illegality of the strike and the denial of the 13th month pay. ISSUES: 1. WON the strike staged by NFSW was illegal? 2. WON the employees are entitled to receive 13th month pay?
RULING:
On review, The Supreme Court, in affirming the decision of the deputy of labor minister, ruled that a) the failure of the NFSW to abide with the mandatory coolingoff period and the 7 day strike ban made the strike illegal and b) the NFSW cannot insist on its claim that its members are entitled to a 13th month pay in addition to the bonuses already paid by CAC.
