Property Law Reviewer

c c c

c O

TABLE OF CONTENTS I. DEFINITION OF PROPERTY .................................................................................................................................. 3

!

" II. OWNERSHIP ..................................................................................................................................................... 8 #

$

$ %

$ # &

' III. RIGHTS OF ACCESSION .................................................................................................................................... 11

(( ) c

(( *c + ,

(( # -

(. ( #

(. .

(. /&&

(. 0

(1 IV. QUIETING OF TITLE ........................................................................................................................................ 15 # 2 3

(! c 2

(! 4 5

(! # 6

(! V. CO-OWNERSHIP............................................................................................................................................... 16 #

(" 7

(" # 7 8

(" # # 7 c

(" % 7

(" * 7 &&

(9 ) /& 7

($ : 7 ; &&

(' / % 7 & && <6 19."=

(' 8 +& 7

(' VI. POSSESSION ................................................................................................................................................... 21 #

.( > c

.( # : c

.( # c

.( 4 &

.. * 4 &

.. ) > c

.. : c

. /

.1 8 c&

.1 - c&

.! VII. USUFRUCT .................................................................................................................................................... 26

." :

." ?

." # ? & @ &

." ?

." * ?

.9 ) 6 A

.9 : ?

.$ / % ?

.' 8 +& ?

.'

c c c

c 9

VIII. EASEMENTS OR SERVITUDES ......................................................................................................................... 32 #

. &B B

. %

. # )

0 > &

* &

) 0 +& &

1 : &

! BOOK III Ȃ DIFFERENT MODES OF ACQUIRING OWNERSHIP ..................................................................................... 37 0 #

9 0 >

9

$ /

$ DONATION ......................................................................................................................................................... 39 6

' >

' -

' 4&

1C 4&

1C

1C *&

1C 4 &

1C

1( #

1. LEASE ................................................................................................................................................................ 45 )

1! -

1!

1"

c c c

c ?

Y

Y YY Y c c Y Y

/ & ,& & & , & D , , & / & 3 VY ? & VY / % & +@& & & VY

A.Y Classification under the Civil Code ( Y Immovableor ealcroperty ( Y ands,buildings,roadandonstrutions A . Y rees,plants,growingruits & && Y verythingattahed && +& , & A & ; 1 Y útatues,relies,paintingsorotherobjetsoruseorornamentation, && & & & & ! Y Pahineries,reeptales,instrumentsandimplements & A & , & A " Y nimalhouses,pigeonhouses,beehives,ishpondsorbreedingplaesosimilarnature, & & & & , & & @ & @ 9 Y µertilizer $ Y Pines,uarries,andslagdumps,& & , ' Y (o sandstrutures, ;& + , A (C Y Ìontrat A servitudes otherrealrights&& Y 6 & & 1(!,c ( , , A 1(!,c $0,> &

Y / 1(!,c ., 1(!,c && 1(!,c 9*D Y # 1(!,c 1% , , ; & 1(!,c !0 , ,& & & 1(!,c "& , 7, , & 1(!,c '#A Y 1(!,c (C A, && Povablesorcersonalcroperty 1(" & & 3

c c c

c

<(=Y & <.=Y c <=Y * <1=Y / , & & & +< 1(!6= 1(9 3 <(=Y ;& & & <.=Y % A ,&& , & DAVAO SAWMILL v CASTILLO () BERKENKOTER v CU UNJIENG () LOPEZ v OROSA () TUMALAD v VICENCIO () ASSOCIATED INSURANCE v IYA () MAKATI LEASING v WEAREVER () BD. OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS v MERALCO () MERALCO v BD. OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS () MERALCO v BD. OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS () CALTEX v BD. OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS () BENGUET CORP. v BD. OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS () . Y /& % *& 3 Y & Y *& & && Y c Y EB8 Y + Y # % (!11 (!11/ samething dierentvendees, & irstta enpossession ingoodaith, IMMOVABLE PROPERTY 6

% IMMOVABLE PROPERTY, >goodaith, irstreorded c % noinsription, inthepossession@ , , oldesttitle, Y c Y Y # c cointoomparison IGHú c ú IGHú # c c & , ; , ;, & && & ,

+ & (=Y % ; ; (=Y ;3 & < & & & .=Y ; & , ;=, & ; =Y D .=Y ) &

;

c c c

A 6& ; ; ;

ñ ;( c ;7 & )

c S =Y ; ; &

&& ; ñ # ; # ; / , /

& ) ; ; & & +& + 6+ ; & & B.Y Classification by Ownership ( Y es ullius ; . Y cubli(ominion ; D 1('c & 1.C &3 <(=Y publiuse, , ,,, , % , A,, & <.=Y % , , &publiservie development onationalwealth 1.(llotherproperty % , ,patrimonialproperty 1..c &,nolongerintended publiusepubliservie, & & % 1.1cropertyorpubliuse, ,, & , ,,& , > , , , & A ,,& &patrimonial, , ; Y c % 1.C1.(1.. Y * Y * Y * & LA BUGAL B͛LAAN TRIBAL ASSN. v RAMOS (2004) ON RECONSIDERATION (2005) CHAVEZ v PEA AMARI (2002) ON RECONSIDERATION (2003) USERO v CA (2006)

c c c

c j

Y c 0 1.1,c ( Y

* A Y c c Y c & c % 1.(

Y c & c 0 1.1,c . Y c c c c 1.!c , & % , , & , belongingtoprivatepersons,

TANTOCO v MUNICIPAL COUNCIL () ZAMBOANGA DEL NORTE v CITY OF ZAMBOANGA () SALAS v JARENCIO () CEBU ACETYLENE v BERCILLES () MUNICIPALITY OF SAN MIGUEL v FERNANDEZ () GOVERNMENT v CABANGIS () CHAVEZ v PEA AMARI (2002) ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (2003) 1 Y % c c c #& Y c outsidetheommere &

Y c ; auisitivepresription Y c attahedorlevied + Y c voluntaryeasement C.Y Other Classifications ( Y + Y & ,& A,+ , & &

Y / & && >3 Y + & Y c & Y c . Y & Y c

Y + & Y 1($0 & 7&& & & withoutbeingonsumed alltheothers Y &

Y 67& & (ierentiatedromµungibleor on-ungible * < = &A, @ && &A, & 67 < &= & Y # 7

c c c

c

1 Y Y # ; ; ,

Y / & & ; ; ! Y Y ) & , ,,

Y % F6 .C % " Y + & Y c+ , ,

Y *+ , + + & 9 Y Y % Y %& Y &

Y ? & ; &,& , $ Y Y 67

Y Y Y 6 ' Y && Y 4&& &

Y && &

c c c

c

Y

Y YY A.Y Definition

úHIc Y

Y

ñ/independentright exlusiveenjoymentandontrol & advantages> 3 VY < = VY c& subjettotherestritions& 3 VY VY / relationinprivatelaw < = & subjetedtohiswill publilawonurrenewiththerightsoanother VY

B.Y Bundle of Rights included in Ownership 1.' righttoexlude &enjoyment disposal * ,& & repelorprevent Y ñ

; Y ñ

; & Y ñ

Y ñ

,& , & Y ñ

C.Y Other Specific Rights found in the Civil Code ( Y +@ 7 @# % 7 1.' ÊÊ ÊÊ !Ê . Y 1C& & & ,, , & & Y ;& + 1!6 + ompetentauthority publiuse just ompensation 1 Y 1$: , 6,& propertyoanother, útate , byhane G / trespasser, / ointeresttosieneorthearts,% & >& ; , & 1' , , hiddenandun nowndeposit money,jewelry,preious objets,lawulownership ! Y 19 " Y 11C 3

c c c VY VY

c Æ

< = / , < =

9 Y

B < "

= Y cB

Y *&& (=Y "

7 & @& & .=Y 7 & =Y * 7 *,/& ,% , % <*/%%= 1=Y ? 7 B B + B < ,( & & &= !=Y 4 "=Y 4 ; HILARIO v SALVADOR (2005) SAMPAYANG v CA (2005) SANTOS v AYON (2005) GANILA v CA (2005) ROSS RICA SALES CENTER v SPS. ONG (2005) PERALTA-LABRADOR v BUARIN (2005) Y *& (=Y

Y > 11/ ,propertymustbeidentiied, &relyonthestrengthohis title A H & Y / SERINA v CABALLERO (2004) Y c A PEREZ v MENDOZA (1975) DIZON v CA (1993) D.Y Limitations of Real Right of Ownership ( Y ) & Y c # 1"4 &D & , , & ,?6%% & D;

Y + Y && 1! . Y % & Y

Y & & & Y Y % Y & & 1( & A & injuretherightsoathirdperson. ÕY

c c c

c O

1. prohibittheintererene &, && & ,& & & & & & & & & & ÕY .('(c & 3 <(=Y explosionomahinery A , && + A > <.=Y exessivesmo e,& & <=Y allingotrees , & ; <1=Y emanations & , , & , "9C# , , & ; > "99 "9$ >,,, ,&, , ,& "9'c & "1' & "!.> "9 & "9" & "11& & & > "$17"$9 ; US v CAUSBY ( ) LUNOD v MENESES ( )

c c c

c OO

Y YY Y A.Y Concept 11C , , Ê$$$%%Ê$ Y 3 & & & , Y ñ3+ < & = 7Y / & ,&;+ 7Y & > 7Y / B.Y General Principles of Accession ( Y : Y <& =

Y 6 ; + . Y %%/66/6? Y 4 built,plantedorsown improvementsrepairs& , , ; 11!

Y A, &madebyowner athisexpense, 11" Y annotbeseparatedinjuryA destrution ,A . ,119 Y & > Y D 1! Y %%/6#/% Y 6? ,/6#?% / /E/ 11( Fc/6%3 Y c Y / Y / < = Y / C.Y Obligations of Receiver of Fruits to Pay Expenses by 3rd person in production, gathering and preservation 11: + & prodution,gathering preservation ÕY %/%3& ;& + ÕY + 3 VY # annualprodution improvement VY & ,+ +, & &naturallyreuired A & ÕY + + ,& + ; &, & A : & A ÕY 4:08?%/*667c06** ?/%3& & & ÕY * 3 <11'= ÕY * 3 , & && & A

c c c

c O9

D.Y Kinds of Accession 1.Y Accession Discreta (Fruits) 11C 3 VY < = VY , < = Y 6 &

Y / & &A Y , A & & BACHRACH v SEIFERT ( ) BACHRACH v TALISAY ( ) 2.Y Accession Continua Over Immovables O.Y rtiiialorIndustrial uilding,clanting,úowing a.Y wneris cúusingmaterialoanother- cúandP 119& A, , ,A& , , & 0 && ;A, , A :, ,0& && , & & Y >c% & Y

Y c% , H & < c%700= 11$ 11' 1!C 1!( 1!. 1! 1!1 Y c% 11$ Y c% 11' 1!C 1!( Y (=Y > , ÚY c 7Y 7Y 6 @ & .=Y c % ÚY c& & c@ c ÚY c%

c c c

c O?

Y

Y

c% 1!. 11 c% 1!1 119 Õ 119 c% , H & 1!! 6 3) + 1!"

BERNARDO v BATACLAN ( ) IGNACIO v HILARIO ( ) SARMIENTO v AGANA ( ) DEPRA v DUMLAO ( ) TECHNOGAS PHIL v CA ( ) ORTIZ v KAYANAN ( ) GEMINIANO v CA ( ) PLEASANTVILLE DEV͛T CORP v CA ( ) FELICES v IRIOLA ( ) SPOUSES NUGUID v CA (1993) SPOUSES NUGUID v CA (2005) 9.Y aturalessionÌontinua atural Y & 1!9 ; A & ÕY 2?/%/%* 6# /6-c* :6*/*: /c /646 <(=Y # & 7+A <.=Y 0 <=Y A ; A ÕY @ A I D & ÕY 4 &54 & ÕY && && REPUBLIC v CA ( ) GRANDE v CA ( ) MENESES ( )

Y 1!'4 ,A & A A , , & &. NAVARRO ( ) Y 1"( 1". 1" BAES v CA ( ) BINALAY v MANALO

c c c Y *& / 1"( 1". 1" 1"1 1"! %c#(C"9 ?.Y everseession (.C,* .(, Over Movables O.Y Ìonjuntionanddjuntion Y $ &

Y % Y c& & Y *& && Y 4 Y Ê 4 Y c 9.Y ÌommixtionandÌonusion SIARI VALLEY ESTATES v LUCASAN (1955) SANTOS v BERNABE () ?.Y úpeiiation

c O

c c c

c OS

Y YY Y A.Y Differences between Action to Quiet Title and Action: tiontouietitle % +

c && , &withoutoundation natureohislaimsothatitmaybe determinedbyderee tiontouietitle

tionto emoveaÌloud c , , &, & & & H & ;+&;& c H &, ,

tiontocreventaÌloud +, & >

ÕY ÕY ÕY ÕY

@ I &,, &,& ,

& & ; /& & & & & & / & +

B.Y Prescription of Action to Quiet Title

Y Y

/ 3& / 3 ,

OLVIGA v CA (1993) PINGOL v CA (1993) C.Y Who are Entitled to Bring Action? "1,% (,c ., D.Y Notes ( Y 19"4 , &,, &, & , , , , & ; , & &> & & . Y c > ;B Y /& &,& , , , , 1 Y c & & TITONG v CA (1998) ! Y > > SPS. PORTIC v CRISTOBAL (2005)

c c c

c Oj

Y Y A.Y Definition

Ì- úHIc Y

&&&& < = B.Y Characteristics of co-ownership ( Y , . Y , Y 7 1 Y 0 &7 ;& PARDELL v BARTOLOME ( ) C.Y Differences between Co-ownership and Joint Tenancy Ìo-ownership ointenany D.Y Differences between Co-ownership and Partnership Ìo-ownership cartnership GATCHALIAN v COLLECTOR ( ) E.Y Source of Co-ownership ( Y Y (19,* (1$,* 'C Y c (1!. Y % Y / 3(1!. Y 3c .& Y # 9! !9,.c Y 19. SIARI VALLEY ESTATE v LUCASAN () Y : 1$ Y &

c c c

c O

"!$ Y PUNZALAN v BOON LIAT ( ) + Y

&& %"<=, 19."

. Y Y & # 7 31'1

Y ? (99$ (99' (9$C Y (99! F.Y Rights of each co-owner as to the thing owned in common ( Y & &,+ & , 3 Y /; ; 7 @

Y 4 7 1$" PARDELL v BARTOLOME ( ) . Y , & 1$! Y Y c& > Y 7& ;& 1$9 RESUENA v CA (2005) ACABAL v ACABAL (2005) 1 Y & 7 3 Y + &&

Y & + 1$$ Y 7H > & + 3 ; 7 Y > & & + & && && & 1$' Y 7 ! Y & 7 1'( Ìúµ I

c c c

Y Y Y

c O

;&& 7 & , + & 7

Y # & & 1'. tsolteration tsodministration Y & 77

~UERY: Is lease of real property owned in common an act of alteration? "19 ($9$<$= " Y & ; ; & 1'.,c LAVADIA v COSME () MELENCIO v DY TIAO LAY () TUASON v TUASON () 9 Y + & (".C (". MARIANO v CA () VERDAD v CA () $ Y A 1'1 RAMIREZ v RAMIREZ () AGUILAR v CA (1993) VDA DE APE v CA (2005) ' Y & (".( (".. HALILI v CA (1998) FRANCISCO v BOISER (2000) G.Y Implications of co-owners right over his ideal share ( Y 7 3 Y

Y ,& & ?37& + & Y ;& Y & + 1$$ . Y 7 Y &

Y > Y 7& A & ;

c c c

c OÆ

1'' Fc A 1'9 CARVAJAL v CA () PAMPLONA v MORETO () CASTRO v ATIENZA () ESTO~UE v PAJIMULA () DIVERSIFIED CREDIT v ROSADO () PNB v CA () H.Y Rules on co-ownership not applicable to conjugal partnership of gains or absolute community of property I.Y Special rules on co-ownership of different stories of a house as differentiated from provisions of Condominium Law (Act No. 4726) ( Y && . Y > && Y && SUNSENT VIEW CONDOMINIUM v JUDGE CAMPOS (1981) J.Y Extinguishment of co-ownership ( Y . Y 0 Y > Y

Y 7 7 Y 2?/%/%7?> 3 Y ?> 7 < & 7=A 7 Y ,& > + > Y & 7 CAPITLE v DE GABAN (2004) 1 Y c Y A &,Fc3 Y 4 < (C = Y 4 & < =+.C 1'1 Y 4 && < = Y 4 && Y 4 < & 7 = 1'1 ÚY >

c c c

Y (C'( !1 (C'. (C' 1'' !CC !C( Y 7 1'9 Y c "',

c 9

c c c

c 9O

Y Y A.Y Definition and Concept

cúúúúI Y Y

/ ;& , & ; / & < = & <

=

B.Y Essential Requisites of Possession ( Y : < = Y &

Y + Y < = RAMOS v DIRECTOR OF LANDS ( ) DIRECTOR v CA ( ) . Y / <

= C.Y Degrees of Holding of Possession ( Y 0 B

. Y c ; , , , ,,, Y neverripenintoullownership norepudiation Y c ; , & & Y & 1 Y c ; & Y , A,

D.Y Cases of Possession ( Y c onesel +one͛sownname nameoanother !.1 . Y coneptoanowner oneptoamereholder !.! Y cgoodaith badaith !." PLEASANTVILLE DEV͛T CORP v CA ( ) Y 0 A > KASILAG v RO~UE (1939)

c c c

c 99

E.Y What things or rights may be possessed !Csuseptibleoappropriation& ; F.Y What may not be possessed by private persons ( Y && . Y c & Y B7 & G.Y Acquisition of Possession ( Y 4 > !( Y 0

Y % ; Y # Y / (=Y " H Y , .=Y & H Y , && & Y c & Y > 3 7Y % 7Y $ "" 7Y 7Y Y / , ,< =, ,; , + ;&,+ & BANCO ESPANOL FILIPINO v PETERSON ( ) . Y & > !. Y & ÊÊ ÊÊ%'$$$ ( Y > . Y / Y c >

Y Ê'$$Ê Y Y ; , ; .(11 1(.' .(!C Y 2 ,& !! Y 4

c c c

c 9?

!9 (((' Y & !9 MACASAET v MACASAET (2004)

Y + A !9 Y ;< = !" CUAYCONG v BENEDICTO () ASTUDILLO v PHHC () PERAN v CFI () 1 Y !$ )6 ?3c D Fc/63/ 7 7 & / , 3 Y cresent

Y / .& ,longer Y / &,presentsatitle Y / > , plaedinjudiialdeposit & H.Y Effects of Possession ( Y / , righttoberespetedinhispossession@ , proteted restored !' Y Y %&& 7Y c & A & & ; 7Y 4(C & & !' YU v HONRADO ( ) Y , Y "

, Y &

Y & 7 1.' . Y ntitlementtoruits B !11 !1' Y eimbursementorexpenses B Y !!

c c c

c 9

!!. 1 Y c & > < =euivalenttotitle !!' Y c atualtitle Y lostamovable unlawullydeprived & reoveritbutwithoutreimbursement Fc3/ > I.Y Effect of possession in the concept of an owner ( Y c& & , ; + . Y c& ; !1( Fc/63((( Y c& + "

1 Y 0 & 7 1.' ! Y c& A c " Y : & & + < & = 9 Y ? ,& & & $ Y ) , D ' Y c !.$ Y 0 A > !.",c J.Y Presumptions in favor of the possessor ( Y goodaith !.$ . Y ontinuityoinitialgoodaith && + &&& & & !.$ CORDERO v CABRAL ( ) Y ;& sameharaterinwhihpossessionwasauired !.' 1 Y 7 provespossessionataprevioustime !!1 ((.C ((.( ((.. ((. ((.1 ! Y 7 wrongullydeprived & !"( " Y &

c c c

c 9S

Y extension allmovablesontained

+ 1." b.Y 67 hereditaryproperty ! (C9$ Y justtitle !1( ((1( K.Y ( Y . Y Y 1 Y

Possession may be lost by & &, # && c @ @ (C Y % ;!9< & ,=

c c c

c 9j

Y

Y Y A.Y Concept !".

úµ Ì Y

/ ,& D; & & + H , , & & , >

B.Y Historical Considerations C.Y Characteristics of Usufruct D.Y Usufruct Distinguished from Lease; from Servitude surut surut E.Y Classes of Usufruct ( Y Y E

Y .( ..",* Y 0+ . Y ; Y %&

Y 0 Y %& Y % & 9!" $" $"' Y ; Y !91

Y Y 6& Y & , > 7 1 Y + Y Y Y c

ease úervitude

c c c

!'$

Y ; Y % Y ? !'! % ; 3 9!$ 9!' ! Y & !"1 Y c

Y Y 4 &< = F.Y Rights of Usufructuary ( Y Y possess enjoy , Y * , Y , !"" 1" Y * !"9 Y !"' !$$

Y lease !9. Y & Y !'C Y + FABIE v DAVID () Y improve !9' . Y a.Y mortgage !9.

Y alienate Fc3 Y / Y 4 & G.Y Rights of Naked Owner ( Y ,, & <% =

c 9

c c c

c 9

. Y # Y

Y :& & 3 !$( H.Y Obligations of Usufructuary ( Y + Y & A !$ Y Ê'$$Ê$Ê( (=Y /&& .=Y 0 Y Ê%Ê$Ê'$Ê Ê$Ê( (=Y 6 ; !$! .=Y +& A =Y & A

Y & Y 6 > 3 (=Y 6 ; !$! .=Y ? !$1 =Y + 1=Y / A Y !$$ Y !$" !'' . Y # Y A A & !$' & "(C

Y A !'. (I cI ú Y A+ 7 !' - (I cI ú (=Y + .=Y 6 A A& & , & !'1,( c =Y 6 A & A+ ÚY / A+ ,& & @ ÚY

c c c

c 9Æ

!'1,. c Y + BD. OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS OF ZAMBOANGA DEL SUR v SAMAR MINING COMPANY INC () Y & "C( Y "C. Y , !'C Y & & Y , A Fc/63 & I.Y Special Cases of Usufruct ( Y ? & !9C . Y ? && !$. Y ? !'( 1 Y ? !9! !9" ! Y ? !9$ " Y ? & "CC 9 Y ? & !'$ $ Y ? !9$ ' Y ? & <> 7 = !91 J.Y Extinguishment of Usufruct "C ( Y # Fc/63 . Y + & & Y && , + + "C"

c c c

c ?

BALURAN v NAVARRO () NHA v CA () BULACAN GARDEN CORP v MANILA SEEDLING BANK () Y 0 A 1 Y Y &

Y 0 + Y / & , & & ($( ! Y + Y / & "C$ ( Y 4 && byownerandusurutuary )*+,- Y / , Y / , . Y 4 Abyowneronly

)*+,. Y &< = Y / , & B& )*/ Y / , , & & Y 4 Abyusurutuaryonly H < = Y / Y 6 Y ? Y

Y / "C9 ( Y / & && Y / , & Y / , & & A & ,

&

Y Y Y / &7 > $ Y 4 +& Y + "C'

Y $(C

c c c Y

H ? "C9 "C$

c ?O

c c c

c ?9

- Y

Y Y Y Y

A.Y Definition

úP or ú I(ú Y Y

/ & +;& & , / && , & & & &

B.Y Essential feature of easements/real servitudes/praedial servitudes ( Y / , . Y / ; < @ = +H < "@ I= Y / && < =,&& 1 Y /&H & &, & & , & ! Y / & " Y / > <"

& @& & I= < = 9 Y ) ,& & & rerainromdoing something<"

=, permitthatsomethingbedone <"

=, not& ownerotheservientestatetodosomething<"

=Fc aessoryobligation < = %!%Ê$$%ÊÊ Ê6+ -- $ Y / & "(9 ' Y / & , && , (C Y / "(" (( Y / & , ,, & & C.Y Classification of Servitudes ( Y Y c

Y c 6 3? & , , " K "(1 . Y Y , "1

Y E

c c c

c ??

Y + "(! Y

Y # 1 Y + "(! Y

Y 67 ! Y ; & "(" Y c

Y 6 Y c & D.Y General rules relating to servitudes ( Y 6 < "= . Y <"

& = Y <" " = 1 Y & +", & ! Y & E.Y Modes of acquiring easements NORTH NEGROS v HIDALGO () ( Y Y 8 , , DUMANGAS v BISHOP OF JARO () Y / & > + & , & >

,L Y 0 Y ;& Y + ".1 AMOR v FLORENTINO () . Y RON~UILLO v ROCO () F.Y Rights and obligations of owners of dominant and servient estates (ominantstate ( Y & Y & "." + & ".!

Y , + , A & ".9

c c c Y

c ?

/ , A & & "!(

DE LUNA v ENCARNACION () . Y & Y & && & "."

Y & A & A & ".9 Y 6 && & ".9 VALDERRAMA v NORTH NEGROS () Y + A , & , ".$ úervientstate Y Y "C

Y & & ".',. c 1 Y Y 6& & ".$,(c

Y + & ".$,.c G.Y Modes of extinguishment of easements "( & + 3 ( Y Perger & & Y 0 , ,&& . Y on-user (C Y & Y # & & Y & & +A

Y 7 & " Y %+ + 7 Y +& & 1 Y + & & ! Y & Y 0 , ,+ < &7= " Y &

c c c

c ?S

9 Y &"( Y & &

Y & Y & Y && Y % + & @ H.Y Legal Easements ( Y & Y * & Y % (=Y c#(C"94 .=Y c#9C!* & Y c .,E//,A// < &=

Y * & Y & ; Y .,E//,A// < &= . Y c & 6 =Y & (=Y 6 "9 ONGSIAKO v ONGSIAKO () .=Y & A "$ %4 =Y & & "' 1=Y > "1. "1 "11 "1! "1" !=Y # & "1C "1( "=Y % A "1'

=Y & "1' "!C "!( "!. "! "!1 "!! "!"

c c c "!9 ~UIMEN v CA (1996) CHAN v CA () LA VISTA ASSN v CA (1997) VDA. DE BELTAZAr v CA () SPS. DELA CRUZ v RAMISCAL (2005) =Y & "!$ "!' ""C ""( "". "" ""1 ""! """ =Y & ""9 ""$ ""' "9C "9( "9. "9 =Y & "91 "9! "9" =Y & "99 "9$ "9' "$C "$( =Y & "$. "$ =Y & ; "$1 "$! "$" "$9

c ?j

c c c

c ?

Y YY Y YY Y Y Mode and Title Differentiated

P( Y Y

& 7+ , & > c+&

I Y Y

; & > &

Modes of Acquiring Ownership /)/60#% Y 4 > 7+ ,, &

& Y

Y / # /E/E0#% Y , ; & , , Y 7 VY 1'" VY (11 VY 0 c VY : VY 11! VY H 1"( VY & 1"" ""$( (1!" (.C =Y #

=Y % =Y c =Y Ê'$$Ê <(=Y c7+ <.=Y 8 & <=Y /< = <1=Y < & >=
c c c

"$$$

Y Y Y %& Y # & Y & Y & Y & & Y 2 7 Y Occupation Y 6 9(1

Y c 9(! Y & & & 9(" !"C Y c 9(9 Y : 9($ 1$ 1' Y & 9(' 9.C c & Intellectual creation / c < $.'= Intelletualcroperty ightsIc Y M

Y & AM& A Y ) Y / Y c Y Y &, M Y c & Y /c %.' / c , 3 Y c#1'/ c #,c#.$! & Y ("!, &c Y ("", & Y ($$ ($' c

c ?

c c c

c ?Æ

Y

Y Nature of donation Y H Requisites of donation Y

Y

< = Y # Y *& 6 Y & impoverishment< = H & enrihment Kinds of donation ( Y A Y $ "" 9.' 9C 9(

Y 9.$ Y $.,* $9,* . Y Y %&

Y & Y & Y /& > Y & & $$. Y 0+ # Y +& Y c

Y 9C 9( ÚY ÊÊ%$ $Ê%$$ Y 4 & 1 Y /& Y &

Y Y & 9.9 (($ ! Y Y H

Y H , Y " Y # ""

c c c

c

Y 4 & & & ; &

Y /& Who may not give or receive donations 9! 99 9$ 91( 91. Who may give or receive donations 9" 9' (C.9 (C. 91C 91 911 Acceptance of donation ( Y 4& 91! 919 . Y & Y "" 91"

Y Form of donations ( Y c 91$ . Y 91' Y 91$ 91' 3 Y

Y 0 Y Y # What may be donated ( Y , , Y c E/##, , & & & 9!C

Y c E/##, & , ,& & 9!. , H ,, 9!' ($9

c c c

c O

. Y / + , inoiious Fc/6% Y # marriagesettlements uturespouses& (B! $1,* (C,

Y # byanasendant ;, +(B(C (C9C Y 4 & not Y * 9!( & Fc/6 Y 0 & + 3 & $1,* (C Effect of donation Y / SHOPPER͛S PARADISE REALTY v RO~UE (2004) ( Y #& & . Y # 9!1 Y # ,Fc + 9!1 1 Y # 9!1 ! Y / ,& && & , ((, " Y # ;7 ,Fc Y #

Y # ; <; =?6%% 9! Y % ( Y < =& 9!! . Y # A 9!" Y 9!9 1 Y c & H 9!$ Y / + VY # ,?6%%

c c c

c 9

VY + ,?6%%

Y / VY # H ! Y / & 9.9 (($ Revocation and Reduction of Donations Y & evoation Y B ( Y / 9!. 99( 99 '(( '(. Y 4& A 99.

Y 3/ .& 99 . Y % > , & 9"C Y ( Y / Y 9"!

Y & 9"' Y 4& 99C Y & 9"" 9"9 . Y E Y c

Y & YULO AND SONS v ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF SAN PABLO (2005) Y

edution

c c c 9". 9"1c . 9"9 1 Y 9"$

c ?

c c c

c

c c c

Y Y A.Y General characteristics of every lease ( Y & . Y Y c + B.Y Kinds of leases ( Y & && . Y A (9CC (9C( (9C. (9C (9C1 (9C! (9C" (9C9 (9C$ (9C' (9(C (9(( (9(. Y Y :

Y A (9( (9(1 (9(! (9(" (9(9 (9($ (9(' (9.C (9.( (9.. (9. (9.1 (9.! (9." (9.9 (9.$ (9.' (9C (9( Y && (9. (9

c S

c c c

(91 (9! (9" (99 (9$ (9' (91C (91( (91. (91 (911 (91! (91" (919 (91$ (91' (9!C (9!( (9!. (9! (9!1 (9!! (9!" (9!9 (9!$ (9!' (9"C (9"( (9". (9" C.Y Lease of things ( Y ("1 . Y & ;& Fc ("1! Y & < =

Y ) & Y % Y & ;&

Y Y Y c + ;& Y & 1 Y &% ,? ,&& & ! Y c Y # & ''

Y / Y ("$. Y ? ("$9 " Y &

c j

c c c

("1' 9 Y % ("!C Y : < '"!=

Y ("!( * ("!. $ Y Y ("!1 (""(

Y ("!9 ("". ("" (""! (""$ (""9 Y & ("!$ Y A ("!' (""C Y & (""1 ' Y ) ;& ("9 6: 2? 3 5 (C Y A & & ; ("91 !',c . (( Y /& + ("9C ("$. ("$9 ("9! (. Y ("9" ("99 ( Y ? & & & ("9$ (1 Y % ("$C ("$(

c

c c c ("$. ("$ ("$1 ("$! (! Y % ("$" ("$9 ("$$

c

Property Law Reviewer

Recommend Documents