Paper is very useful for our daily life. We get lots of new information and ideas in our daily life but these ideas and information may lose if we don't save it. And the paper is very basic …Full description
Paper is very useful for our daily life. We get lots of new information and ideas in our daily life but these ideas and information may lose if we don't save it. And the paper is very basic …Full description
Kasar
strength properties of kraft paperFull description
proses industri kimia, digester, pulp and paper, teknik kimia, kertas dan pulp, proses pengolahan, alat industri kimia. penjelasan mengenai bagian bagian pada digester di pabrik kertas dan p…Full description
Corporation Law SEC jurisdiction
you will check important paper mills and paper mill members list for your reference
pulp and paperDeskripsi lengkap
partnership
IAC VALVULA
DIGEST
Corporation Law caseFull description
gfFull description
Ajuste de válvula IAC y TPS motores de inyección electrónicaFull description
Rustan Pulp and Paper Mills v. IAC Facts: Sometime in 1966, petitioner Rustan established a pulp and paper mill. In 1 967, respondent Lluch who is a holder of a forest products license transmitted a letter to petitioner Rustan for the supply of raw materials by the former to the latter. Petitioner, in response thereto, proposed that the contract to supply to not be exclusive because Rustan shall have the option to purchase from other qualified suppliers. These prefatory business proposals culminated in the execution of a contract of sale whereby Lluch agreed to sell and Rustan undertook to pay the price of the pulp wood raw materials to be delivered in the buyer’s plant. Buyer in the contract stipula ted
that he shall have the right to stop delivery of the said raw materials by the seller covered by the contract when it shall become necessary with sufficient notice to seller. In the installation of the plant facilities, the technical staff of Rustan recommended the acceptance of deliveries from other suppliers which corresponding deliveries were made. During the test run of the pulp mill, the machinery line had major defect while the deliveries of the raw materials piled up which prompted the Japanese supplier to recommend the cessation of the deliveries. The suppliers were informed to stop the deliveries. Private respondent LLuch sought to clarify the tenor of the letter as to whether the cessation of delivery or the termination of the contract of sale was intended but to no avail. With the ambiguity notwithstanding, Lluch and the other suppliers resumed the deliveries. In 1969, the complaint for contractual breach was filed but was dismissed so they took it with the respondent court which ordered the payment by the petitioners of damages to private respondents. ISSUE: W/N the contractual stipulations by Rustan as regards to stoppage of delivery o f the materials are valid. W/N Petitioners should be held liable for damages. HELD: Lluch was correctly apprehensive as to the stipulations as regards the delivery considering that the conditions resented was solely dependent upon the will of Rustan. The resumption of the delivery was dependent also on the sole will of Rustan. Futher, given that the company continued receiving the supplies from Lluch and the other suppliers, it was doubtful that Rustan had sufficient suppliers. Because of the purely potestative imposition, the stipulation should be stricken out without affecting the other validly stip ulated conditions relating to the fulfillment of an a lready existing obligation. The condition which is both potestative and resolutory may be valid however it would only be valid at the beginning of the contract and not during the fulfillment of an already existent obligation. However, the private petitioners may not be held liable for damages as individuals even if they entered into the contract in their official capacities because the corporation has a distinct and separate identity from their members. Absent stipulations to the contrary, they may not be held liable in their personal capacities.
