USA vs. Guinto



Search



Home



Saved

0

22 views



Upload

Sign In

Join

RELATED TITLES

0

USA vs. Guinto Uploaded by Neil bryan Moninio



Top Charts



Books



Audiobooks

not mine









Save

Embed

Share

Print

Download



Magazines



News



Documents



Sheet Music



Wood v. Milyard, 10th Cir. (2011)

1

of 2

 

1 - 2.Sander v. Veridiano and US

USA v. Guinto

 Search document



United States of America vs. Guinto 182 SCRA 644

Facts:  These cases have been consolidated consolidated because they all involve the doctrine of Immunity. In GR No. 76607, the private respondents are suin several o!cers of "S #ir $orce in %lar& #ir 'ase in connection (ith the biddin conducted by them contracts for barber services in the said base (hich (as (on by a certain )i*on. respondents (anted to cancel the a(ard to the bid (inner because they claim that )i*on had included in his bid an area not included in the invitation to bid, subse+uently, to conduct a rebiddin. In GR No. 7-70, $abian Genove led a complaint for damaes aainst petitio /amachia, 'elsa, %artalla and rascion for his dismissal as coo& in the "S #ir $o Recreation centre at %amp 1ohn 2ay #ir Station 'auio %ity. It had been ascerta after investiation, from the testimony of 'elsa, %artalla and rascion, that Gen had poured urine into the soup stoc& used in coo&in the veetables served to club customers. /amachia, as club manaer suspended him and thereafter refe the the case case to a boar board d of arbi arbitr trat ator ors s conf confor orma mabl bly y to the the coll collec ecti tive ve bar bar areement bet(een the centre and its employees. The board unanimously fo him uilt uilty y and reco recomme mmende nded d his dis dismis missal sal.. Genove Genove3s 3s react reaction ion (as to le complaint aainst the individual petitioners. petitioners. In GR No. 40054, /uis 'autista, (ho (as employed as a barrac&s boy in % 3)on 3)onnel nell, l, an eten etensi sion on of %lar& %lar& #ir 'ase, 'ase, (as arre arreste sted d follo( follo(in in a buy operation conducted by the individual petitioners (ho are o!cers of the "S $orce and special aents of the #ir $orce !ce of Special Investiators. n basis of the s(orn statements made by them, information information for violation of R.#. 6 other(ise &no(n as the )anerous )rus #ct, (as led aainst 'autista in the of Tarlac. Tarlac. Said o!cers testied aainst him at his trial. 'autista (as dismissed f his employ employmen ment. t. 2e then then led led a compl complain aintt aains aainstt the the indiv individu idual al petiti petiti Sign up to vote on this title claimin that it (as because of their acts that he (as removed. Useful Not useful In GR No. 40894, a complaint for damaes (asled by  the private responde aainst the herein petitioners :ecept the "S;, for inict of factual alleati





Home



Saved



Top Charts



Books



Audiobooks



Magazines



News



Documents



Sheet Music



Upload

Sign In

Join



Search



Home



Saved

0

22 views



Upload

Sign In

Join

RELATED TITLES

0

USA vs. Guinto Uploaded by Neil bryan Moninio



Top Charts



Books



Audiobooks

not mine









Save

Embed

Share

Print

Download



Magazines



News



Documents



Sheet Music



Wood v. Milyard, 10th Cir. (2011)

1

of 2

 

1 - 2.Sander v. Veridiano and US

USA v. Guinto

 Search document



5. ?hether or not the defendants (ere also immune from suit under the R@ 'ases Treaty for acts done by them in the performance of their o!cial dut

Rulin: "S vs G"INT :GR No 76607;  The court nds the barbershop sub




Home



Saved



Top Charts



Books



Audiobooks



Magazines



News



Documents



Sheet Music



Upload

Sign In

Join