28728452 Slab Formwork Design[1]

Civil Engineering Dimension, Vol. 8, No. 1, 47–54, March 2006 ISSN 1410-9530

Technical Note

SLAB FORMWORK DESIGN Octavian George Ilinoiu Technical Manager Alpine S.A., Sos. Vergului no. 18, sector 2, Bucharest, Romania Email: [email protected]

Catatan Redaksi: Perencanaan bekisting (form work) di Indonesia sering kali dilalaikan dan diserahkan kepada pelaksana/ mandor, padahal kegagalan bekisting akan menimbulkan masalah yang sangat rumit. Bekisting juga merupakan komponen biaya pelaksanaan struktur beton bertulang yang cukup besar. Makalah ini memaparkan praktek perencanaan bekisting untuk lantai di Romania, dimana perencanaan bekisting merupakan salah satu syarat untuk mendapatkan sertifikasi insinyur professional. Makalah ini adalah kelanjutan dari makalah Wall Formwork Design, yang dimuat dalam Dimensi Teknik Sipil, Vol. 6, no.2, September 2004.

Note from the Editor: In Indonesia, although cost of formwork contributes significantly to the total reinforced concrete construction cost and formwork failure will result in a very complicated construction problem, formwork design is often neglected and left to the foreman to design. This paper presents slab formwork design practice in Romania, where formwork design is a requirement to obtain professional engineer certification. This paper is a continuation of previous paper ” Wall Formwork Design” by the same author published in Dimensi Teknik Sipil, Vol. 6, no. 2, September 2004.

GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS Although formwork is temporary in nature, the methods used in building formwork must adhere to code specifications [1] that apply to the particular material being used. Each component of the form must be able to support its load from two points of view: (1) strength, based on the physical properties of the material used, and (2) serviceability, the ability of the selected sections to resist the anticipated loads without exceeding deflection limits. The usual format of a modular plywood panel, consists of framed plywood sheet screwed/nailed on a timber studwork (Figure 1). Plywood is a sheathing product made of several wood veneers with their grain lying (normal to one another) at right angles and firmly glued together under pressure, producing a panel that has uniform properties in both directions, an advantage regarding increased bending, shear, and deflection properties. [4] When designing modular formwork for concrete, there is frequent intermixing of standard size units that have the following nominal dimensions, as shown in Table 1. Note: Discussion is expected before June, 1st 2006. The proper discussion will be published in “Dimensi Teknik Sipil” volume 8, number 2, September 2006.

Table 1. Formwork Panel Nominal Dimensions [3] Size Type of Length Width panel (mm) (mm) P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8

2400 2400 2400 1200 1200 1200 600 600

300 400 600 300 400 600 300 400

Components No. of No. of No. of traverse studs braces frames 2 2 3 3 2 6 3 2 6 2 2 1 3 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 3 2 -

Thickness of panel

100 mm

SHORING MEMBERS Shoring members support formwork and their contents, bearing loads and limiting their deflections. They can be divided into two major categories according to type and shape of concrete member that will be supported: a. Horizontal shores (also known as joists) range from small units 1,8 m, to large members 9,0 m, used to carry much heavier loads, usually manufactured from wood or high-tensile steel, typical steel joists are illustrated in Figure 2. They are placed one along side another at allowable spans as specified in Table 2, and in accordance with bearing load imposed upon formwork.

Civil Engineering Dimension ISSN 1410-9530 print © 2007 Thomson GaleTM http://puslit.petra.ac.id/journals/civil

47

O. G. Ilinoiu / Slab Formwork Design / CED, Vol. 8, No. 1, 47–54, March 2006

(a)

(b)

(c) Figure 2. Typical Steel Telescopic Joists. a. Joist Length 1,8..3,0 m; b. Joist Length 3,0..5,0 m and c. Joist Length 3,6…6,0 m [1] b. Vertical shores (also known as props) support the horizontal shores (joists) from a firm base below. They may be manufactured of wood or steel, with various shapes, depending on the particular scope, typical adjustable steel pipe shores are illustrated in Figure 3. Vertical wood shores may be single wood posts, with wedges to adjust the height, double wood posts, two-piece adjustable posts, or T head shores.

Figure 1. Typical Plywood Panel Caption: 1. Plywood sheathing; 2. Batten (Stud); 3. Brace; 4. Transverse frame: e = 8; 15 mm, d = 92; 85 mm, c = 48 mm, i = 68 mm, f = 38 mm. [1, 2, 3]

Table 2. Allowable Spans “d” (m) Between Joists in Accordance With Length and Imposed Load [3] Load (N/m2) d (m) 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2

2000

2500

3000

2.97 2.77 2.60 2.46 2.34 2.24 2.15 2.07

2.82 2.62 2.46 2.33 2.21 2.12 2.03 1.96

2.69 2.50 2.34 2.21 2.10 2.01 1.93 1.86

Telescopic joist 1,8…3,0 m Span of joist “D” in accordance with “d” distance between joists 3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 6000 6500 7000 7500 2.58 2.39 2.24 2.12 2.01 1.92 1.84

2.39 2.30 2.15 2.03 1.93 1.84

2.34 2.21 2.07 1.96 1.86

2.31 2.14 2.00 1.89

2.24 2.07 1.94 1.83

8000

8500

9000

2.18 2.01 1.88

2.17 1.96 1.83

2.06 1.91

2.01 1.86

1.96 1.82

1.92

1.80

3.74 3.44 3.21 3.02

3.63 3.34 3.11

3.53 3.25 3.03

3.44 3.17

3.36 3.09

3.28 3.02

3.21

4.62 4.25 3.96 3.72

4.48 4.12 3.84 3.61

4.36 4.01 3.73

4.25 3.91 3.64

4.14 3.81

4.05 3.72

3.96 3.64

Telescopic joist 3,0…5,0 m d (m) 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2

5.00 4.83 4.51 4.23 4.04 3.85 3.69 3.55

4.93 4.55 4.25 4.01 3.80 3.63 3.47 3.34

4.68 4.32 4.04 3.80 3.61 3.44 3.29 3.16

4.47 4.13 3.85 3.63 3.44 3.28 3.14

4.29 3.96 3.69 3.47 3.29 3.14

4.13 3.80 3.55 3.34 3.17 3.02

3.98 3.67 3.42 3.22 3.05

3.85 3.55 3.31 3.11

Telescopic joist 3,6…6,0 m d (m) 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2

6.00 5.98 5.59 5.27 4.99 4.76 4.56 4.38

6.00 5.64 5.27 4.96 4.70 4.48 4.29 4.12

5.80 5.35 4.99 4.70 4.46 4.25 4.07 3.91

5.54 5.11 4.76 4.48 4.24 4.05 3.87 3.72

5.31 4.89 4.56 4.29 4.07 3.87 3.71

5.11 4.70 4.38 4.12 3.91 3.72

4.92 4.53 4.23 3.97 3.76

4.76 4.38 4.08 3.84 3.64

48


Vertical metal shores may be adjustable pipe shores or shores made up of prefabricated steel tubing. Scaffold-type shoring, is usually assembled into towers by combining a number of units into a single shoring structure.

Table 4. Types of Loads According to Weight of Material or Equipment [1] Item

Type load

a

Weight of the formwork itself and the scaffold

b

Weight of fresh concrete

:c

Uniform distributed load of runways for concrete transport and impact loads of the crowding of crewmen Concentrated one crew member that load form weight carries loads of work crews wheel barrow/ buggies for and transport concrete transport equipment: Load from the vibrating effect of the concrete compaction:

d

e

Figure 3. Typical Adjustable Steel Pipe Shore (Prop) [3] Table 3. Allowable Axial Load “P” (daN) on Shore in Accordance With Length Item name

Hmax (mm) Hmin (mm)

Steel shore Steel shore PE 3100 R PE 5100 R

3100 1700 min 20000 Load (N) max 45000

5100 3100 18000 45000

Light Steel Light Steel steel shore steel shore telesco telescopi with with pic spatial c shore spatial shore PU 1200 base base PES 3100 PES 5100 PU 3100 3100 5100 3100 1220 1700 3100 1700 232 2000 18000 6000 3000 45000 45000 12000 45000

Building material, equipment lumber in panels lumber in shoring elements plywood normal weight (heavy) concrete lightweight concrete panel design horizontal shoring (joists) of panels vertical shoring elements (e.g. props, columns)

Value 7500 N/m3 6000 N/m3 8500 N/m3 plain 24000 N/m3 reinforced 25000 N/m3 7000–19000N/m3 2500 N/m2 1500 N/m2 1000 N/m2

1300 N 2800 N 1200 N/m2

Table 5. Combination of Loads According to Member Design [1, 3] Item name Slab and arch forms and horizontal props (joists) Vertical props for slabs Column forms with the maximum edge of 30 cm and walls of maximum 10 cm width Column forms and walls with larger values Lateral faces of forms for beams and arches Bottom of beams Centers and scaffolds < 6 m Centers and scaffolds > 6 m

Combination of loads Strength Deflection a+b+c+d

a+b

a+b+c

a+b

f+g

f

f f a+b+e a + b + c (e) a + b + c (e) + h

f f a+b a+b a+b

FORMWORK PRINCIPLES AND LOADS ON CONCRETE SLABS

SLAB FORMWORK AND SHORING SYSTEM DESIGN

The principles behind good formwork are based on the same basic frame theories used in the design and construction of structural frames. Formwork must be able to withstand loads that, in many respects, can be more severe than those experienced by the completed structure. It is imperative that each component of the formwork be erected according to the formwork drawings to ensure that all construction loads are safely supported.

Formwork must be checked to ensure that they withstand bending and shear, and that deflection will not exceed the specified value according to surface finishing.

For the design of formwork, the loads on concrete slabs (Table 4) must be taken into account differently, in combination, according to Table 5. The design of formwork components will be made according to the following characteristics: type of material used, nature of the load, number of reuses, moisture conditions and deflection limitations.

Evaluation of Loads 1. Weight of 8 (15) mm panel sheathing. 2. Weight of fresh concrete (hslab). 3. Uniform distributed load of runways for concrete transport and impact loads of the crowding of crewmembers. 4. Concentrated load weight of work crews and transport equipment. 5. Load from the vibrating effect of concrete consolidation.

49


Note 1: The loads on plywood are usually considered as being uniformly distributed over the entire surface of the plywood. The concentrated load “d” can by transformed in a uniform distributed load, by dividing it to the span “l”.

Table 6. Properties of form Material PROPERTIES OF FORM Allowable bending stress (σa) Allowable bending stress (σa)

Note 2: This design recommends three basic span conditions for computing the uniform load capacity of plywood panels. The span may be single span, two-spans or three–span according to the panel’s width.

Material

Value

lumber

12 N/mm2

plywood

Allowable bending stress of steel (σa) Modulus of elasticity lumber plywood

Plywood Panel Design Recommended standard thickness of plywood (δpanel), 8 or 15 mm. When calculating the allowable pressure of concrete on plywood as limited by the allowable unit stress deflection of the plywood, use the clear span between supports.

When the face grain 13 N/mm2 is parallel to the span When the face grain 5 N/mm2 is perpendicular to the span 210 N/mm2 10.000 N/mm2 7.000 N/mm2

steel Allowable bending architectural concrete deflection limitations concrete surfaces with finishing

210.000 N/mm2 L maximum clear span/300 L maximum clear span/200

Allowable tolerances length and width of panel thickness of panel length of diagonals of panel

+ 2 mm - 5 mm ± 5 mm

a. For 30 cm width panel: q (daN/m)

q l/2

l = 25.2 cm

q l/2

Reactions for a simple beam with a uniformly distributed load q = uniformly distributed load pre unit length (ml) [Nml] Verification for bending stress: The calculation is made for a width of b=1m. q = (a + b + c) x 1.00 + d/l (N/ml) Where: l = span between supports (25.2 cm) The maximum bending moment that will occur at the center of the beam, will be calculated as follows: M = ql2/8 The applied bending stress must not exceed the allowable bending design stress:

Verification for deflection: The calculation is made for a width of b=1m. q = (a + b) x 1.00 m (N/ml) For a rectangular beam subjected to bending the applied deflection f can be calculated form the following equation: 5 qxl 4 fe = x 384 ExI The applied deflection must not exceed the allowable design deflection:

Where: σ e = applied bending stress;

Where: f e = applied deflection;

σe ≤σa

σ a = allowable bending design stress; M = bending moment [Nmm]; I = moment of inertia of the cross section [mm4]; W = section modulus of the cross- section [mm3] y M σe = M = ≤σa I W

M = q x l2/8; W= b x h2/6 h = 8 or 15 mm

fe ≤ fa

f a = allowable design deflection; I = moment of inertia of the cross section [mm4]; E = modulus of elasticity [N/mm2] fe =

5 qxl 4 l ≤ fa = x 384 ExI 200

I = bxh3/12 (mm4) h = 8 or 15 mm E = 7000 (N/mm2)

50


b. For 60 cm width panel: q (daN/m)

l = 27.6 cm

l = 27.6 cm

Reactions for a simple beam with a uniformly distributed load spanning over three or more equally spaced supports. q = uniformly distributed load pre unit length (ml) [Nml] Verification for bending stress: The calculation is made for a width of b=1m. q = (a + b + c) x 1.00 + d/l (N/ml) Where: l = span between supports (27,6 cm) The maximum bending moment that will occur at the center of the beam, will be calculated as follows: M = ql2/10 The applied bending stress must not exceed the allowable bending design stress:

σe ≤σa

σ e = applied bending stress; σ a = allowable bending design stress;

M = bending moment [Nmm]; I = moment of inertia of the cross section [mm4]; W = section modulus of the cross- section [mm3].

y M = ≤σa I W

qxl 4 ExI

The applied deflection must not exceed the allowable design deflection: Where:

f e = applied deflection; f a = allowable design deflection; I = moment of inertia of the cross section [mm4]; E = modulus of elasticity [N/mm2].

f e = 0.005 x

qxl 4 l ≤ fa = 200 ExI

I = bxh3/12 (mm4) h = 8 or 15 mm E = 7000 (N/mm2)

M = q x l2/10; W= b x h2/6 h = 8 or 15 mm

Horizontal Steel Telescopic Joist Design q

15

H

f e = 0.005 x

fe ≤ fa

Where:

σe = M

Verification for deflection: The calculation is made for a width of b=1m. q = (a + b) x 1.00 m (N/ml) For a rectangular beam subjected to bending the applied deflection f can be calculated form the following equation:

Joist

Loads: q = a + b (N/m2) From Table 2, according to the type of joist used, the load “q” and the span of the joist “D” the spacing “d” of joists under paneling is given. q = uniformly distributed load pre unit length (ml) [Nml] Technical note: If the value “d” is not a common measure of the standard panel length, the joists will be placed at equidistance, but not more than “dmax” for Table 2.

Shore (prop)

Batten (Stud) Design The design will be made in the most unfavorable situation; this will be, the design of the central stud of the 60 cm width plywood panel. Loads:

15

Figure 4. Typical View of Joist and Prop Requirement: Spacing of joists under paneling “d” (m).

For verification for bending stress: q = (a + b + c) x l.00 + d/l (N/ml) For verification of deflection: q = (a + b) x 1.00 m (N/ml)

51


a. For panel with L = 1.20 m and spacing between joists d = 1.20 m P q (daN/m) h=85 or 92

L = 1.20 m

b=48

P = concentrated load do to work crews and transport equipment [N] q = uniformly distributed load pre unit length (ml) [Nml] Verification for deflection:

Verification for bending stress:

M σ e = x ≤ σ a = 12 N/mm2 W

fe =

M = bending moment [Nmm]; W = section modulus of the cross section [mm3]

M=

l 5 qxl 4 ≤ fa = x 384 ExI 200

f e = applied deflection; f a = allowable design deflection; I = moment of inertia of the cross section [mm4]; E = modulus of elasticity [N/mm2] bxh 3 (mm4) I= 12 b = 48 mm, h = 85 mm E = 10000 (N/mm2)

qxL2 PxL + 8 4

bxh 2 4,8x8,5 2 = 6 6 h = thickness of stud 85 or 92 mm W=

b. For panel with L = 2.40 m and spacing between joists d = 1.20 m P

P q (daN/m)

L = 1.20 m

L = 1.20 m

P = concentrated load do to work crews and transport equipment [N] q = uniformly distributed load pre unit length (ml) [Nml] Verification for bending stress: M σe = ≤ σ a = 12 N/mm2 W M = bending moment [Nmm]; W = section modulus of the cross section [mm3] qxL2 PxL M= + 0,203x 8 4

bxh 2 4,8x8,5 2 = 6 6 h = thickness of stud 85 or 92 mm W=

Verification for deflection: f e = 0,005 x

qxl 4 l ≤ fa = ExI 200

f e = applied deflection; f a = allowable design deflection; I = moment of inertia of the cross section [mm4]; E = modulus of elasticity [N/mm2] bxh 3 (mm4) I= 12 b=48 mm, h = 85 mm E = 10000 (N/mm2)

52


Steel Pipe Shore Design

8.

Chudley, R., Building Site Works, Substructure and Plant, Longman Scientific and Technical, 1988.

9.

Chudley, R., Advanced Construction Technology. Pearson Education Ltd., England, 1999.

P

10. Ilinoiu, G., Construction Engineering. Conspress, 2003.

H

11. Ilinoiu, G., Construction Project Engineering. Conspress, Bucharest 2004. 12. Plesca, A., Manualul Dulgherului, Editura Tehnica, 1998. Figure 5. Schematic View of Prop (Shore)

13. Nunnally, S.W., Construction Methods and Management. Pearson – Prentice Hall, 2004.

The design will be made for the most loaded shore. D P = (a + b + c )xdx (N) 2 Where: d = spacing of joists support under the paneling (m); D = span of telescopic steel joist (m); P = concentrated load do to work crews and transport equipment [N] The type of steel pipe shore will be chosen if:

Pa = Pmax −

(P

max

)

− Pmin x (H story − H )

(H max − H min )

≥ P (N)

REFERENCES 1.

C11-1974, Instructiuni Tehnice Privind Alcatuirea si Folosirea in Constructii a Panourilor Din Placaj.

2.

Popa, R. and Teodorescu M., Cofraje Modulate de Lemn, ICB, 1978.

3.

Teodorescu, M., Tsicura, A, Ilinoiu, G., Îndru-Mator Pentru Examenul de Licenta la Disciplina “Tehnologia Lucrarilor de Constructii”, UTCB, 1998.

4.

Peurifoy, R., and Oberlender G., Formwork for concrete structure, McGraw-Hill, 1996.

5.

Andres, C., and Smith, R., Principles and Practices of Heavy Construction. Prentice Hall, 1998.

6.

Andres, C., and Smith, R., Principles and Practices of Commercial Construction. Prentice Hall, 2003.

7.

APA, Concrete forming. Design and Construction Guide, The Engineering Wood Association, 1999

53

28728452 Slab Formwork Design[1]

Recommend Documents