Bunge Corporation v Camenforte.docx

BungeCor por at i onvCame menf or t e( 29August1952) Baut i s t aAngel o,J . FACTS: •

•

•

• •

•

Pl ai nt i ffs cl ai m t hata cont r actwas ent er ed i nt o bet ween t he Vi sayan Pr oduct s Comp mpany ( r epr esent ed by Ca me me nf o r t ea ndc o mp mp an y )a ndBu ng eCo r p .f o rt h es a l eo f5 00l o ngt o nsofc o pr ai nb ul kat$ 18 8. 8 0p ert o n. I twa ss t i p ul a t edt h atVi s a y anPr o duc t swo ul ds hi pt h ec o pr ao nNo v emb ero rDe ce mb mb er1 94 7t ot h epl a i n t i ffi nSF , CAf ordel i v er y . Vi s ay anPr oduc t sf ai l edt omak et hed el i v er y .Bel i e vi ngi ngo odf ai t ht hatt hec opr awoul dbedel i v er edont i me, pl ai nt i ffsol dt oEl Dor adoOi l Wor k st hequant i t yofc opr ai tpur c has ed. Bec aus eoft hef ai l ur et os hi pan ddel i v ert hec opr ao nt i me,pl ai nt i ffc l ai msi ts uff er eddamageswor t hP1 80, 00 0. De f e nd an tVi c e nt eKh oa dmi t t e dt h ati twa sVi s a y anPr o du ct s T ac l ob ant h ate nt e r e di nt ot h et r a ns ac t i o na ndn ot Vi s a y a nPr o du c t s Ce bu . Hewa st h eman age ra ndco nt r o l l i n gs t o ck ho l d ero fVi s a y anPr o du ct s T ac l o ba n. o Kh oc l ai mst h ath e“ d i dh i sb es t ”t oc omp l ywi t ht h ec o nt r a ctb utf a i l e dt od os obe c au s eo ff or c ema j e ur e.He s t at edt hath ear r ange df oras hi pt omak et h edel i v er y ,butb ef or et hes hi par r i v ed,as t or mo cc ur r edc aus i ngt h e d es t r u ct i o no ft h eb od eg awh er et h ec o pr awa ss t o r e d.

I SSUES+RULI NG:

WoNt hec i v i l l i abi l i t yoft hedef endant ssubs i s t sdes pi t eoft hef or t ui t ousev ent . YES. Thes ubj ec toft hec ont r ac ti s500t onsofc opr a;i tdoesnotr ef ert oan ypar t i c ul arors pec i fi cc opr a,nordoesi t me nt i ont h ep l a cewh er et h ec opr ai st ob ea cq ui r ed . Thesubj ec tmat t eroft hesal ei st her ef or egener i candnots pec i fi c. o I ta ppe ar i ng t hatt he o bl i gat i on ofa ppel l anti st o del i v erc opr ai n a ge ner i cs ens e,t he obl i g at i on c an no tbe d ee me me de x t i n gu i s he db yt h ed es t r u c t i o no rd i s a pp ea r a nc eoft h ec o pr a . Thei robl i gat i ons ubs i s t sasl ongast hatc ommodi t yi sav ai l abl e.A gener i cobl i gat i oni snote xt i ngui s hedbyt he  g .Genusnunquanper i t l os sofat hi ngbel ongi ngt oapar t i c ul a r enus . Ac c o r d i n gt oMa Ma nr e s a:   ac onc r e t e,par t i c ul ar i z edobj ec t ,i ndi c at edbyi t sowni ndi v i dual i t y Speci fict hi ng: o   newhos ed et er mi nat i oni sco nfi nedt ot hatofi t sna t ur e,t ot h egen us( gener o)t owhi c hi t Ge ne r i ct hi ng: o per t ai ns •

•

•

•

YES. Wo Nd ef e nd an t sar el i a bl ef o rd a ma ma ge s . Ac cor di ngt ot hepl ai nt i ff ,i ts uff er eddamageswor t h$84, 630. 86asi tf ai l edt odel i v ert hec opr at oEl Dor ado. Th el o we rc o ur tr u l edt h att h es al et oElDo r a dowasc on cl u de db ef o r et h es al eb et we enp l ai n t i ffa ndd ef en dan t c or p or a t i o n.Ass uc h ,t h ec opr as ol dt oEl Do r a doc ou l dno th av ebe ent h eo nepu r c h as edf r o md ef e nd ant . Ho we v er ,t hel o werc our ts t i l l f ou ndi tpr opert oa war ddamag es .   t hel owerc o ur ti ni t sr ul i ng;t h e di ff er enc ei nt hed at esi smer el ynomi nalbec aus eo ft het i medi ff er e nc e SC: bet weenNYandCebu. • •

• •

  Affir me d.Co s t sa ga i n s td ef e nd an t . DI SPOSI TI ON: