"o
/24
634
yes
INERPREAI!N:
Out of )** "espondent =7+ were not satisfied with "ecruitment process% while C?+ respondent was satisfied.
!RGANI5AI!NAL DIMENSI!N
G:. Indicate the e-tent of satisfaction regarding the followingM ;/3/"(& !I>! =@+
/9"/>9 @C+
3O1 5+
INERPREAI!N:6
The study reeals that more than half of the total employees are quite satisfied with their salary structure. 1e came across% that )0@ of employees seems to be dissatisfied with the salary.
?. 1O"N 3O/ !I>! =7+
/9"/>9 @?+
3O1 )*+
IET9"4"9T/TIOE&'
8ore than half of the total respondents @?+P are satisfied and =7+P of the employees are quiet satisfied with their workload. )*+P of the respondent mentioned it to be low.
5. ,39QIBI3IT( O, 1O"IE> !O2;9
!I>! =7+
/9"/>9 @C+
3O1 )7+
IET9"4"9T/TIOE&'
The employees of ;T/E/" /2TO />9E
)*. "91/";
!I>! ):+
/9"/>9 ):+
3O1 CC+
IET9"4"9T/TIOE&'
Though% roughly ):+ of respondent hae stated the reward system of ;T/E/" /2TO />9E
)). 1hat methods is used for the performance appraisal system in your organizationM Table no : "9;4OE;9
EO. O, "9;4OE9ET;
"anking
:7
,orced distribution
):
Other
))
TOT/3
)**
others &&4
&>4 forced distri%ution
ranking >24
IET9"4"9T/TIOE& Out of )** "espondent :7+ told ranking is the performance appraisal system . Only ):+ respondent told forced distribution and ))+ are think to other.
&)' Are (o, satisfied +ith (o,r #ro"otion acti/ities in (o,r
!rganization.
ab$e no 7
"9;4OE;9
4ercentage of respondents
(es
::+
Eo
7=+
.
no 2/4
yes >>4
INERPREAI!N:
Out of )** "espondent 7=+ were not satisfied with 4romotion actiities% while::+ respondent were satisfied
&0'
Does the #resent #erfor"ance a##raisa$ s(ste" "eet (o,r Career
ad/ance"ent.
ab$e no 8
"9;4OE;9
EO. O, "9;4OE9ET;
(es
CC
Eo
C
7?
TOT/3
)**
>raph no 5
can?t say 234
yes no 64
664
INERPREAI!N:
Out of )** "espondent C+ were not satisfied with 4erformance /ppraisal ;ystem% whileCC+ respondent were satisfied. 7?+ told they donDt know about that.
&2'
Are (o, co"fortab$e +ith the +or-ing en/iron"ent.
ab$e no &9
"9;4OE;9
4ercentage of respondents
(es
C?+
Eo
=7+
>raph no )*
no /24
yes 634
INERPREAI!N:
Out of )** "espondent =7+ were not satisfied with "ecruitment process% whileC?+ respondent were satisfied
FINDIN*
?C+ "ecruitment are done by management % ?+ has done by references% while 6+ recruitment by newspaper and only 7+ has done by other
•
=7+ were not satisfied with "ecruitment process%
•
while C?+ respondent were satisfied
•
5+ were not satisfied with "ecruitment process%
•
while 5)+ respondent were satisfied.
•
76+ were not satisfied with "ecruitment process%
•
while :C+ respondent were satisfied.
•
=7+ were not satisfied with "ecruitment process% while C?+ respondent were satisfied.
•
:7+ told ranking is the performance appraisal system .
•
Only ):+ respondent told forced distribution and ))+ are think to other.
•
"espondent 7=+ were not satisfied with "ecruitment process%
•
while::+ respondent were satisfied
•
C+ were not satisfied with "ecruitment process%
•
whileCC+ respondent were satisfied.
•
7?+ told they donDt know about that.
•
=7+ were not satisfied with "ecruitment process% whileC?+ respondent were satisfied
•
The employees seem to be quiet comfortable with the working proided to them.
•
The communication channel is strong enough to satisfy the employees of /QI; B/EN.
•
The salary is comparatiely satisfactory and so majorities of respondents are comfortable with it.
LIMITATIONS
I. 1ithin the short span of time aailable and considering the large organization% it has not been possible to make a complete and e-haustie study. ata was collected and analyzed on the basis of questionnaires. II. Eo secondary data and preious records based on studies made earlier related to the subject were aailable at the time% which would hae gien a better insight about the topic. III. ;ome of the employees seemed to be reluctant in sharing their iew and reealing their feelings regarding certain dimensions mentioned in the questionnaires. I. 8any of the employees who were willing to cooperate with us in our research studies% were not able to find sufficient time as they seemed to be quiet busy and oerload with their work.
SU**ESTIONS G
There are the following suggestions being an !" researcher would like to gie the organization&
•
Organization should keep the eyes on the recruitment process they should recruit the employees from outside as well means from where they get the employees they should recruit them.
•
/s the organization is growing faster they should emphasis on the Job ;atisfaction een though their Job ;atisfaction programs are quite good.
•
Organization should regularly gie the increment on the salary so that who are not satisfied they would become also satisfied.
•
Organization should analyze the training methods and should adopt those methods which are good for the employees and promotion actiities should be good so that employees are satisfied as we know this is the basic requirement of the success.
CONC5USIONS
There are the following conclusions come up after the research of the project by filling the questionnaire&
•
The working enironment of the organization is e-cellent this is reason why employees are doing the work their and they are stable there.
•
>enerally organization appointed the employees through the recommendations that is references een though other sources are there.
•
The employees are satisfied with the recruitment process of the organization.
•
8ost of the employees consider that the salary increment policy is good.
•
>enerally ranking method is used in the organization for the performance appraisal system and with the promotion actiities.
•
/s they accept that the working enironment is really good this shows they are satisfied and the satisfaction of the employees of the organization is ery necessary.
•
/nd at last researcher would like to say that satisfied employees contribute more to the organization this is the reason why
BIB5IO*RA6HY 1!!S;
!uman resource management prentice !all of India 4t. 3td. Eew ehli. Nothari% <.".% "esearch 8ethodology% 1ishwa 4rakashan% India.
•
Notler% 4hilip% 8arketing 8anagement% 4rentice hall India.
•
N./swathappa.% !." and 4.8 Third 9dition
•
Tata 8c >raw'!ill 4ublishing
CERTIFICATE OF +UIDE
:A3ALPUR
This is to 1erti0 that the 6ro/e1t Re!ort on
To:-Anal1sis on A(is
ani !urgavati "ishvavidya#aya $aba#%ur whi1h has #een 1o+!-ete, '()(*
3ank=
s%#+itte, theMaster eerti In Lieu of Course #0 Code 405 of Arts %+ar in Human Shak0a at @aster o Arts in H%+an Reso%r1e
A,+inistration
is
a
SU3MITTED TO #0 hi+. This SU3MITTED 3Y #onaf,e work re!ort D%. A%!ana M't!1e
has&on. Di%eto% #een
4ee%ti 4'"a% S!ak1a
1o+!-ete, %n,er Roll No2 7>7?8@5
Cente% ;o% Manage"ent B&RA ? $%i,an1e o Dr. Ar1hana MA @%th0e St'#ies
%#
Se"
Signature
Date*
o+
,uide Plae* :abalp'%
ACN!
ith the na+e o a-+i$ht0 *o,) or $i"in$ +e stren$th an, hea-th) with his $ra1in$ an, $%i,an1e to 1o+!-ete this !ro/e1t s%11ess%--0 witho%t his -essin$ this !ro/e1t wo%-, ne"er r%n s+ooth. 5ast #%t not the -east) to a-!eo!-e !ro/e1t.
aro%n,
those
1ontri#%tes
to
this
4ee%ti 4'"a% S!ak1a
Dec$aration of the St,dent
I here#0 ,e1-are that the !ro/e1t work entit-e, M A
St'#1 o; :ob Anal1sis on A(is 3ank S%#+itte, to Dire1tor 1enter or @ana$e+ent st%,ies *.S. Co--e$e o Co++er1e E1ono+i1s Ja#a-!%r @.6. is a re1or,e, o an ori$ina- work ,one #0 +e with the !ro/e1t $%i,e %n,er the $%i,an1e o Dr. Ar1hana @%th0e Dire1tor Center or @ana$e+ent st%,ies an, work is neither s%#+itte, an0where e-se or another ,e$ree nor 1o!ie, ro+ an0where e-se.
Signat'%e
Na"e S!ak1a
* 4ee%ti 4'"a%
C!NENS S.NO
PARTICULARS
1.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
2.
INTRODUCTION
3.
OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY
4.
COMPANY PROFILE
5.
CONCEPTUAL BACKGROUND
6.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
.
S!OT ANALYSIS
".
DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
#.
FINDINGS
1$.
LIMITATIONS
11.
SUGGESTIONS
12.
CONCLUSION
13.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
PAGE NO.
A )$./T .)T
SU3MITTED FOR T&E PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF DE+REE OF MASTER OF 3USINESS ADMINISTRATION 3at! 56752567>
UNDER T&E +UIDANCE OF PR%&. N'('N )A*R
Name of (he Project )uide
+,%. - MBA
Mrs. Ka"pana Sin!h
S%1MIED 1Y
SHALINI ARAL M1A III SEMESER
ENR!LL N! = 1C>&)0)0 DEPARMEN !? MANAGEMEN S%DIES
RANI D%RGA@AI @ISH25678
ACN!
I am greatly obliged to% for proiding me with the right kind of opportunity and facilities to complete this enture. I a" i""ense$( gratef,$ and dee#$( indebted to Prof Nitin Ga,r H'!'D'
1,siness Ad"inistration of a-shshi$a Instit,te of
Engineering and echno$og( Baba$#,r for this "ora$ s,##ort and enco,rage"ent thro,gho,t the #roect +or-'
I am highly thankful to 4rof. Mrs' a$#ana Singh #,aculty$ my internal faculty guide under whose able guidance this project work was carried out. I thank his for his continuous supports and mentoring during the tenure of the project. ,inally% I would also like to thanks all my dear friends for their cooperation% adice and encouragement during the longs and arduous task of carrying out the project and preparing this report. I take this opportunity to e-press my deep sense of gratitude of all those who hae contributed significantly by sharing their knowledge and the e-perience in the completion of this project work.
ated 4lace & Jabalpur
SHALINI ARAL
CERI?ICAE
I hereby certify that MS' SHALINI ARAL has completed her project entitled KA S%DY !? B!1 ANALYSIS IN AFIS 1AN 2nder guidance of 4rof. Nalpana ;ingh #Internal >uide$ ,aculty of #!"$ partial fulfillment of the degree of 8aster of Business /dministration. The 4roject is forwarded to e-aminer for ealuation
DAE :
PR!?' NIIN GA%R
H'!'D
ASHSHILA C!LLEGE
BA1ALP%R
DECLARATION
I hereby declare that the project entitled KA S%DY !? B!1 ANALYSIS IN AFIS 1AN In the fulfillment of the partial requirement
for the award do the degree of master of business /dministration submitted at "ani urgaati ishwaidyalaya Jabalpur #8.4$ is an authentic of my work. The facts and figure embodied in this report is original and is not substantially the same as one which has been submitted for degree or diploma at any
ated & 4lace & Jabalpur
SHALINI ARAL
8.B./. III ;emester ASHSHILA C!LLEGE BA1ALP%R
