Concordia University ECON 201 Introduction to Micro Economics Assignment #1 (Scored 100%) Winter 2004
IITHFull description
Full description
Full description
MOSFETS
Business Intelligence And Data Mining- Cell2Cell - The Churn Game
MATH3871 Assignment 1 UNSW
ethicsDeskripsi lengkap
AnushaFull description
system verilog assignFull description
engg941Full description
ethics
Assignment
a
Definition of Hypertext
Full description
Western Mindanao State University College of Law Legal Logic and Techniques
______________________________________________________ ________________ Assignment Item No. 3. Exerci Exercise se II (Page (Page 240) 240) - Ident Identif ify y the the rule rule that that is broke broken n by any any of the the foll follow owin ing g syllogisms that are invalid, and name the fallacy that they commit. Answers with solutions: 1. All crim crimina inall actions actions are are wicked wicked deeds deeds.. All prosecutions for murder are criminal actions. Therefore all prosecutions for murder are wicked deeds.
Mood and Figure = AAA-1 The argument is VALID.
2. No tragic tragic actors actors are idiots idiots.. Some comedians are not idiots. Therefore some comedians are not tragic actors.
Rule Broken: Avoid two (2) negative premises. Fallacy : Fallacy of Exclusive Premises
3. Some Some parr parrot ots s are not not pest pests. s. All parrots are pets. Therefore no pets are pests.
Rule Broken: Any term distributed in the conclusion must be distributed in the premise. Fallacy : Fallacy of an Illicit Process – Illicit Minor
4. All perpetual perpetual motion motion devices devices are are 100-percent 100-percent efficie efficient nt machines. machines. All 100-percent efficient machines are machines with frictionless frictionless bearings. There Therefo fore re some some mach machin ines es with with fric fricti tion onle less ss beari bearing ngs s are are perp perpet etua uall moti motion on devices.
Rule Broken: Avoid four terms Fallacy : Fallacy of Four Terms
5. Some good actors are not powerful athletes. All professional wrestlers are powerful athletes. Therefore all professional wrestlers are good actors.
Rule Broken: Fallacy: Fallacy of Drawing an Affirmative Conclusion from a Negative Premiss
6. Some diamonds are precious stones. Some carbon compounds are not diamonds. Therefore carbon compounds are not precious stones.
Rule Broken: Any term distributed in the conclusion must be distributed in the premise. Fallacy: Fallacy of an Illicit Process – Illicit Major
7. Some diamonds are not precious stones. Some carbon compounds are diamonds. Therefore some carbon compounds are not precious stones.
Rule Broken: Fallacy: Fallacy of the Undistributed Middle
8. All people who are most hungry are people who eat most. All people who eat least are people who are most hungry. Therefore all people who eat least are people who eat most.
Rule Broken: Avoid four terms Fallacy: Fallacy of Four Terms
9. Some spaniels are not good hunters. All spaniels are gentle dogs.
Therefore no gentle dogs are good hunters.
Rule Broken: Any term distributed in the conclusion must be distributed in the premise. Fallacy : Fallacy of an Illicit Process – Illicit Minor Exercise III (Page 241) - Identify the rule that is broken by any of the following syllogisms that are invalid, and name the fallacy that they commit. 1. All inventors are people who see new patterns in familiar things, so all inventors are eccentrics, since all eccentrics are people who see new patterns in familiar things.
Standard Form: Since all eccentrics are people who see new patterns in familiar things All inventors are people who see new patterns in familiar things So all inventors are eccentrics.
Rule Broken: Fallacy: Fallacy of the Undistributed Middle
2. Some snakes are not dangerous animals, but all snakes are reptiles, therefore some dangerous animals are not reptiles.
Standard Form: All snakes are reptiles Some snakes are not dangerous animals Therefore some dangerous animals are not reptiles.
Rule Broken: Any term distributed in the conclusion must be distributed in the premise. Fallacy: Fallacy of an Illicit Process – Illicit Major
3. Some foods that contain iron are toxic substances, for all fish containing mercury are foods that contain iron, and all fish containing mercury are toxic substances.
Standard Form:
All fish containing mercury are toxic substances All fish containing mercury are foods that contain iron Some foods that contain iron are toxic substances.
Rule Broken: Fallacy: Existential Fallacy
4. All opponents of basic economic and political changes are outspoken critics of the liberal leaders of Congress, and all right-wing extremists are opponents of basic economic and political changes. It follows that all outspoken critics of the liberal leaders of Congress are right-wing extremists.
Standard Form: All right-wing extremists are opponents of basic economic and political changes All opponents of basic economic and political changes are outspoken critics of the liberal leaders of Congress It follows that all outspoken critics of the liberal leaders of Congress are rightwing extremists.
Rule Broken: Any term distributed in the conclusion must be distributed in the premise. Fallacy: Fallacy of an Illicit Process – Illicit Minor
5. No writers of lewd and sensational articles are honest and decent citizens, but some journalists are not writers of lewd and sensational articles; consequently some journalists are honest and decent citizens.
Rule Broken: Fallacy:
6. All supporters of popular government are democrats, so all supporters of popular government are opponents of the Republican Party, inasmuch as all Democrats are opponents of the Republican Party.
Rule Broken: Fallacy:
7. No coal tar derivatives are nourishing foods, because all artificial dyes are coal tar derivatives, and no artificial dyes are nourishing foods.
Rule Broken: Fallacy:
8. No coal tar derivatives are nourishing foods, because no coal tar derivatives are natural grain products, and all natural grain products are nourishing foods.
Rule Broken: Fallacy:
9. All people who live in London are people who drink tea, and all people who drink tea are people who like it. We may conclude, then, that all people who live in London are people who like it.