TRAINING REPORT ON CATIA, UNDERTAKEN AT CETPA INFOTECH PVT. LTD, LUCKNOW
Under the guidance of: Mr. Vineet Kr. Mahali Submitted By:
Vishal Pandey
Roll No.:
108305
Department:
Mechnical
Institute:
NIT Kurukshetra
CONTENTS
y
INTRODUCTION
1. Introduction to CATIA 2. History 3. Industry using CATIA 4. Comparison of Computer Aided Design software for Engineering 5. y
SOLID MODELING 1. About Solid Modeling
2. Constraints in solid modeling 3. Solid modeling vs. Surface modeling y
PROJECT DOCUMENTATION DOCUMENTATION
DOUBLE BEAR ING ING ASSEMBLY of different parts parts 1. Drafting of different 2. Creating different parts different parts 3. Assem bling BUTTERFLY VALVE ASSEMBLY 1. About Butterfly Valve 2. Structure 3. Types of different parts parts 4. Drafing of different 5. Creating different parts different parts 6. Assem bling
CONTENTS
y
INTRODUCTION
1. Introduction to CATIA 2. History 3. Industry using CATIA 4. Comparison of Computer Aided Design software for Engineering 5. y
SOLID MODELING 1. About Solid Modeling
2. Constraints in solid modeling 3. Solid modeling vs. Surface modeling y
PROJECT DOCUMENTATION DOCUMENTATION
DOUBLE BEAR ING ING ASSEMBLY of different parts parts 1. Drafting of different 2. Creating different parts different parts 3. Assem bling BUTTERFLY VALVE ASSEMBLY 1. About Butterfly Valve 2. Structure 3. Types of different parts parts 4. Drafing of different 5. Creating different parts different parts 6. Assem bling
INTODUCTION Intoduction to CATIA V5R19 CATIA (Computer Aided Three-dimensional Interactive Application) is a multi-platform CAD/CAM/CAE commercial software suite developed by the French company Dassault Systemes and marketed worldwide by IBM. Written in the C++ programming language, CATIA is the cornerstone of the of the Dassault ystemes product lifecycle management software suite. T hrough its exceptionally Systemes product easy ± toto- use state of the of the art user interface, CATIA delivers inno vative technologies for maximum for maximum producti productivity and creativity, from concept to the final bility of using product. CATIA reduces yhe learning cur ve ,as it allows the flexi b based and parametric feature- b and parametric designs .
CATIA provides three basic platforms: P1, P2, P3. P1 is for small and medium sized process oriented companies that wish to grow the large scale digitized product definition. P2 is for advanced design engineering companies that require product, process and resources modeling. P3 is for high end design application and it is basically for Automotive and Aerospace industry, where high quality surfacing or Class-A surfacing is used for designing for designing.
History :
CATIA started as an in-house development in 1977 by French aircraft manufacturer Avions Marcel Dassault, at that time customer of customer of the the CADAM CAD software.
Initially named CATI (Conception Assistée Tridimensionnelle Interactive ² French for Interactive Aided Three-dimensional Design ) ² it was renamed CATIA in 1981, when Dassault created a su bsidiary to develop and sell the software, and signed a non-exclusive distri b bution [2] agreement with IBM. In 1984, the Boeing Company chose CATI A as its main 3D CAD tool, becoming its largest customer . In 1988, CATIA version 3 was ported was ported from mainframe computers to U NIX.
In 1990, General Dynamics E lectric Boat Corp chose CATIA as its main 3D CAD tool, to design the U.S. Navy's Virginia class su bmarine. In 1992, CADAM was purchased from IBM and the next year CATIA CADAM V4 was pu blished. In 1996, it was ported from one to four Unix operating systems, including IBM AIX, Silicon Graphics IR IX, Sun Microsystems SunOS and Hewlett-Packard HP-UX. In 1998, an entirely rewritten version of CATIA, CATIA V5 was released, with support for U NIX, Windows NT and Windows XP since 2001. In 2008, Dassault announced and released CATIA V6. While the ser ver can run on Microsoft Windows, Linux or AIX, client support for any operating system other than Microsoft Windows is dropped.
Industries using CATIA
CATIA is widely used throughout the engineering industry, especially in the automotive and aerospace sectors. Aerospace
The Boeing Company used CATIA V3 to develop its 777 airliner, and is currently using CATIA V5 for the 787 series aircraft. They have employed the full range of Dassault Systemes' 3D PLM products ² CATIA, DELMIA, and E NOVI A LCA ² supplemented by Boeing developed applications. Chinese Xian JH-7A is the first aircraft developed by CATIA V5, when the design was completed on Septem ber 26, 2000. European aerospace giant Air bus has been using CATIA since 2001. Canadian aircraft maker Bom bardier Aerospace has done all of its aircraft design on CATIA. The Brazilian aircraft company, EMBRAER , use Catia V4 and V5 to build all airplanes. Vought Aircraft Industries use CATIA V4 and V5 to produce its parts. The British Helicopter company, Westlands, use CATIA V4 and V5 to produce all their aircraft. Westlands is now part of an Italian company called Finmeccanica the joined company calls themselves AgustaWestland.
The main supplier of helicopters to the U.S Military forces, Sikorsky Aircraft Corp., uses CATIA as well. Automotive
Many automotive companies use CATIA to varying degrees, including BMW, Porsche, Daimler AG, Chrysler, Audi,[11] Volkswagen, Bentley Motors Limited, Volvo, Fiat, Benteler AG, PSA Peugeot Citroën, R enault, Toyota, Ford, Scania, Hyundai, koda Auto, Tesla Motors, Proton, Tata motors and Mahindra & Mahindra Limited, [[MLR motors, Hydera bad][International cars & motors ltd(Sonalika group0,http://www.icml.co.in]. Goodyear uses it in making tires for automotive and aerospace and also uses a customized CATIA for its design and development. Many automotive companies use CATIA for car structures ² door beams, IP supports, bumper beams, roof rails, side rails, body components ² because CATIA is very good in surface creation and Computer representation of surfaces. Shipbuilding
Dassault Systems has begun ser ving ship builders with CATIA V5 release 8, which includes special features useful to ship builders. GD Electric Boat used CATIA to design the latest fast attack su bmarine class for the United States Navy, the V irginia class. Northrop Grumman Newport News also used CATIA to design the Gerald R. Ford class of supercarriers for the US Navy. Other
Architect Frank Gehry has used the software, through the C-Cu bed Virtual Architecture company, now Virtual Build Team, to design his award-winning cur vilinear buildings. His technology arm, Gehry Technologies, has been developing software based on CATIA V5 named Digital Pro ject. Digital Pro ject has been used to design buildings and has successfully completed a handful of pro jects.
Comparison of Computer Aided Design software for Engineering
A pplication and developer
2D/3D or S pecialty fields
R uns on Support for Support Windows? Building for
Support
for Information Industry Drawing Modelling? Foundation Exchange Classes? Format?
Ali bre Design by Ali bre, Inc. ArchiCAD by Graphisoft Auto CAD 2011 by Autodesk Bricscad by Bricsys BRL-CAD by United States Army R esearch La boratory
Caddie Professional by Advanced Computer Solutions CATIA by Dassault Systèmes Co balt by Ashlar-Vellum Co balt by Ashlar-Vellum DataCAD by DATACAD LLC DDS-CAD Architect & Construction by DDS Building Innovation Digital Pro ject by Gehry Technologies A pplication and developer
2D/3D + Yes R endering 2D/3D Yes Architecture 2D/3D AEC Yes
Unknown
Unknown
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
2D/3D AEC Yes
Yes
Unknown
Yes
3D design
Yes
Unknown
No
Yes
XP Vista
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
2D/3D CAE Yes
Yes
Unknown
Yes
2D/3D R endering CAE CAM 2D/3D MCAD 2D/3D MCAD
XP Vista
No
No
Yes
& Windows 7 Yes
Unknown
Unknown
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
2D/3D A/C
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
2D/3D/4D AEC
32bit and 64bit
Yes
Yes
Unknown
2D/3D or S pecialty
Yes
Unknown
Unknown
Yes
3D
Yes
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
3D
Yes
Unknown
Unknown
Yes
and simulation for military vehicles
2D/3D CAE, R endering
& Windows 7
fields
FreeCAD by Juergen R iegel freeCAD (AikSiong K oh) by Aik-Siong K oh
formZ by Auto DesSys, Inc. HiCAD by ISD Group IntelliCAD by IntelliCAD Technology Consortium Autodesk Inventor by Autodesk MicroStation by Bentley Systems NX by S iemens PLM Software Pro/E NGINEER by Parametric Technology Corporation Progecad (based on IntelliCAD) by progeSOFT QCad Community Edition by R i bbonSoft QCad Professional by R i bbonSoft R evit Architecture by Autodesk R evit Structure by Autodesk R evit MEP by Autodesk Solid Edge by Siemens PLM Software Solidworks by SolidWorks Corp. Sweet Home 3D by eTeks
2D/3D AEC XP, Vista R endering 32bit and 64bit 3D/2D Yes
Yes
Unknown
Yes
Unknown
Unknown
Yes
2D/3D AEC Yes
Yes
Unknown
Yes
3D
Unknown
No
Yes
2D/3D AEC Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
2D/3D
Yes
Unknown
Unknown
Yes
3D
Yes
Unknown
Unknown
Yes
2D/3D R endering
Yes
No
No
Yes
2D
Yes
No
Unknown
Yes
Unknown
Yes
No
No
Yes
2D/3D BIM Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
2D/3D BIM Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
2D/3D BIM Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
3D/2D
Yes
Unknown
No
Yes
3D
Yes
Unknown
Unknown
Yes
2D placing
Yes
Unknown
Unknown
Yes
furniture
Yes
and 3D preview
Tur boCAD by 2D/3D IMSI/Design, LLC VariCAD by 2D/3D VariCAD Vector Works by 2D/3D Nemetschek ZWCAD by ZWCAD Software Co., Ltd.
2D/3D
Yes
Unknown
Unknown
Yes
Yes
Unknown
Unknown
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Unknown
Unknown
Yes
Solid Modeling 'Solid Modeling' is a method used to design parts by com bining various 'solid o bjects' into a single three-dimensional (3D) part design. Originally, solid modelers were based on solid o bjects being formed by primitive shapes such as a cone, torus, cylinder, sphere, and so on. This evolved into solid o bjects being created and formed from swept, lofted, rotated, and extruded 2D wireframe or sketch geometry.
Because of their limited use, some solid modelers have a bandoned the primitive shapes altogether in favor of predefined li brary solid o bjects. 'Stock' li brary o bjects pro vide the designer with a similar shape to begin the design with, eliminating some of the initial tedious design work .
The real power of a solid modeling application is how it can take the solid o bjects and com bine them together by intersecting, joining, or su btracting the o bjects from one another to create the desired resulting shapes. Because everything in a solid model design is a 'watertight' model of the part, the solid modeler is a ble to know the topology of the entire model. By topology we mean that it knows what faces are ad jacent to each other and which edges are tangent.
Since the solid modeler's data base knows so much a bout the entire part model, it can perform functions virtually impossi ble with surface modeling. F or example you can fillet all the ad jacent edges of a face to other faces in a single command. Another popular example is the 'shell' function of solid modelers. This allows you to define a constant wall thickness for the entire model with a simple task with a single command
constraints in solid modeling
Most solid modelers support 'geometric constraints'. A geometric constraint is the relationship of an entity to other entities. Constraints are only used on the underlying sketch or wireframe entities that define the solid o bject bounaries. Some common 'constraints' for these entities are coincident, collinear, intersect, parallel, perpendicular, and tangent . When one or more entities are 'constrained' to each other, changing any of the entities will most likely have an effect on the others. In the example , the lines and arcs have been assigned tangent constraints to each other and two arc are mirror to each other . When one of the arcs in the solid's boundary sketch is changed other one is also changed.
Some solid
modelers automatically assign the constraints for you as you design the part. O thers provide the a bility to assign constraints as you are designing. CATIA will automatically assign constraints where it thinks you want them and then allow you to modify or remove them manually later . In following example tangent constraint is automatically assign by CATIA
Single entity attri butes such as 'horizontal' and vertical' are also considered to be constraints, since tagging an entity with one of these attri butes will keep the solid modeler from changing it when other entities that have relationships to it are changed. Constraints are one of the system basics needed to provide true geometric associativity. Most solid modelers will allow you to add and modify constraints as needed. There are even some solid modelers that will attempt to automatically assign the required geometric constraints logically from the steps you take to design the part Solid modeling vs. Surface modeling:
For designs that require any com bination of fillets along multiple edges, contain drafted surfaces, or constant wall thickness, solid modeling is far superior to surface modeling. For designs that require sculptured surfaces with a lot of cur vature (the mouse you are using on you computer comes to mind) a surface modeler is far easier than a solid modeler . In fact it may be virtually impossi ble to create some shapes with a solid modeler and hold exact dimensions for very complex shapes.
Pro ject Documentation DOUBLE BEAR ING ASSEMBLY: Consist of following components: 1. Base
2. Cap
3. Bolt
4. Bushing
Creating dou ble bearing assem bly : Step 1: Creating different parts in parts in Part Design Work bench Step 2: Assem bling different part in Assem bly Design Work bench
STEP 1: Creating Base: y
y
y
y
Enter into CATIA by dou ble clicking on the icon. Select ³start´ > Mechanical design >Part design to create new part Name this part as ³base´.
Click on XY plane and then on Sketch icon
y
Following sketch is made .
y
Exit to Sketcher on clicking exit sketch icon
y
Padding is done by clicking on the ³ pad´ icon.
y
Mirror og the whole body was taken.
y
Following step was taken as shown in tree
y
Following sketches are made to complete the base as la beled in the tree expansion
y
Final model of the base after applying material is shown below
Creating Cap : y
Following step was taken as shown in tree expansion
sketch 1 sketch 2 sketch 3 sketch 4 3D view of cap
Creating Bushing : y
Following step was taken as shown in tree expansion
sketch 1 sketch 2 3D view of bushing
Creating Bolt : y
Following step was taken as shown in tree expansion sketch 1 sketch 1 is made
padding of 4 mm
Edge fillet is applied having radius 1mm and made it as body 1 sketch2 Hexagonal sketch is made for bolt head as body 2
boolen operation intersect of two body
sketch 3 sketch waas made and pading is done for the bolt length
3D view of bushing
STEP 2: Different parts are assem bled in following order : y y y y
Base Bushing Cap Bolt
3D view and exploded views are shown below:
BUTTERFLY VALVE ASSEMBLY:
A butterfly valve is a valve which can be used for isolating or regulating flow. The closing mechanism takes the form of a disk . O peration is similar to that of a ball valve, which allows for quick shut off . Butterfly valves are generally favored because they are lower in cost to other valve designs as well as being lighter in weight, meaning less support is required. A butterfly valve is from a family of valves called quarter-turn valves. The "butterfly" is a metal disc mounted on a rod. When the valve is closed, the disc is turned so that it completely blocks off the passageway. W hen the valve is fully open, the disc is rotated a quarter turn so that it allows an almost unrestricted passage of the fluid. T he valve may also be opened incrementally to throttle flow.
Structure Butterfly valves are valves with a circular body and a rotary motion disk closure mem ber which is pivotally supported by its stem. A butterfly valve can appear in various styles, including eccentric and high-performance valves. These are normally a type of valve that uses a flat plate to control the flow of water . As well as this, butterfly valves are used on firefighting apparatus and typically are used on larger lines, such as front and rear suction ports and tank to pump lines. A butterfly valve is also a type of flow control device, used to make a fluid start or stop flowing through a section of pipe. The valve is similar in operation to a ball valve. R otating the handle turns the plate either parallel or perpendicular to the flow of water, shutting off the flow.
Types 1. Resilient butterfly valve , having a flexi ble ru bber seat. Working pressure 232 psi 2. High performance butterfly valve , usually dou ble eccentric in design. Working pressure up to 725 psi 3. Tricentric butterfly valve , usually with metal seat design. Working pressure up to 1450 psi
Butterfly valve consist of following components: ITEM
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
QTY
1 2 1 1 1 3 1 1
NAME
BODY ROU ND HEAD MACHINE SCREW PLATE SHAFT RETAINER ROU ND HEAD MACHINE SCREW ARM HEX ROU ND NUT
DRAFTING OF COMPO NE NTS: 1. BODY
DESCR IPTIO N CAST IRO N #4-4U NF X .250 ALUMINIUM STEEL STEEL #10-32U NF X .500 STEEL .375-24U NF
2. ARM
3. SHAFT
4. RETAINER
5. PLATE
6. SCREW
7. NUT
Creating Butterfly Valve assem bly : Step 1: Creating different parts in parts in Part Design Work bench Step 2: Assem bling different part in Assem bly Design Work bench
STEP 1: Creating Body :
y
3D view of body
y
Following step was taken as shown in tree expansion with help of following sketches
sketch 1 sketch 1 is made and padding is done
sketch 2 sketch 2 is made and padding is done
tritangentfillet cmd is applied
sketch 3
sketch 4 sketch 4 is made padding is done
sketch 4
sketch 5
sketch6
sketch 7
Creating Arm: y
Following step was taken as shown in tree expansion with help of following sketches
sketch 1 sketch 2 3D view of Arm
Creating Shaft:
y
Following step was taken as shown in tree expansion with help of following sketches
sketch1 sketch 2 sketch 3 sketch4
3D view of Shaft
Creating Plate:
y
Following step was taken as show n in tree expa nsion with help of follo wing sketc hes
3D view of Plate
Creating R etainer:
y
Following step was taken as shown in tree expansion with help of following sketches
3D view of Plate
Creating Screw: y
Following step was taken as shown in tree expansion with help of following sketches
Cr eat ing Nut: y
Following step was taken as shown in tree expansion with help of following sketches