Three indicted for SWATting incident, attempt to cover it up.
ATP
a
PIL case
US v. Ross Ulbricht IndictmentDescripción completa
US v. Ross Ulbricht Indictment
Criminal Law Case Digest
US v. Ross Ulbricht IndictmentFull description
US v. Ross Ulbricht Indictment
Full description
US v Manalinde FACTS:
Igual (Spaniard) was seated in front of a store store when Manalinde attacked him from behind and wounded him on the head with a kris. Meanwhile, M eanwhile, Choa was just passing along the street, was just putting his load in front of the store and was about to enter, when Manalinde attacked him with the kris and seerel! wounded him on the left shoulder. shoulder. "oth men were taken to the hospital where the t he Chinaman died within an hour. hour.
#espondent #espondent was charged with murder for the death of the Chinaman. $hen arrested, Manalinde pleaded guilt!. guilt!. %e confessed that his wife died &'' da!s before and that atu #ajamudah Mupuck actuall! ordered him to go juramentado in Cotabato in order to kill somebod! because Mupuck had certain grieances to aenge against a lieutenant and a sergeant.
Manalindes reward once he accomplished the task was a prett! woman. In case he gets caught, Manalinde was ordered b! Mupuck to sa! that he performed the act in accordance to the orders of Matica!o, atto *iang, +ambal +ambal and Inug.
1. Juan
2.
3.
4. +o +o
carr! out his plan, he proided proided himself with a kris, which he concealed in banana leaes. %e traelled da! and night before arriing at the town and going juramentado.
5. +he
respondent further confessed that he had no uarrel uarrel with the assaulted persons.
ISSU SS UE:
$- the the crime perpetrated uali/es for aggraating circumstances
HELD/RATIO :
01S. +he crime was committed with treacher! and premeditation. +reacher! was committed because the accused attacked the deceased when the latter was unable to defend himself or een to 2ee from the danger. +he accused performed the act of his own olition and with the knowledge of the irreparable damage that he would in2ict upon others. *remeditation was present in the sense that upon accepting the order and undertaking the journe! in order to compl! with the said order, the accused deliberatel! considered and carefull! and thoughtfull! meditated oer the nature and conseuences of the acts which he was about to carr! out. %e een proided himself with a weapon (een going to the e3tent of concealing the weapon b! wrapping it up) and traelling for a da! and a night for the sole purpose of taking the life of two unfortunate persons whom he did not know and with whom he had neer an! trouble. +he crime was considered to be premeditated since it was eident that there was a /rm and persistent intention of the accused from the moment when he /rst receied the order until the crime was committed. o mitigating circumstance can be a4orded to the accused because his act was not a matter of proper obedience. %is allegation that he acted according to the atus order cannot e3culpate him because it is the barbarous and saage custom of a juramentado to kill an!one without an! motie or reason whateer, and as such, it cannot be accepted or considered under the laws of ciili5ed nations. Such e3hibitions of ferocit! and saager! must be restrained.