Analysis Work Procedure_V1.0.2

CLOT Analysis Work Procedure


Contents I. Actix KPI Report generation procedure II. KPI PASS CASE work procedure III.KPI FAIL CASE work procedure IV. Analysis work procedure for each Layer V. Appendix

© Samsung Electronics. All Rights Reserved. Confidential and

2


Actix Report generation process


3

CLOT Analysis Work Procedure ActixOne Report Check N o

1

Owner

Coordinat or

Job Category

Check DT information

2 Analyzer Coordinat or

Description

Check Log File Count

- This stage is can be apply KPI Pass case only - If KPI fail case, go to next slide

Check Drive Test Date & Duration

- Drive start and end date

Compare Log file count

- Compare Log file counts with FMS and processed logs in Actix

Report Generation

3

4

Job Title

Generate Report

Analyzer

Preparatio n

- Check whether the KPI results are properly visible or not

Tool

- Acti x

Output

Next Step

Reference Material

- If mismatch log file count with Actix processed and FMS, request to roupload missing logs to FMS - If generated KPI report is having problems, request to NEO team to fix the problems

Preparation for create analysis Report


ActixOne report gen eration methods

4

CLOT Analysis Work Procedure Preparation for Actix KPI Report Circle

FMS

ActixOne

Coordinator

Analyzer

NEO Team

Description

Upload Log files Inform to how many logs, DT start date and end date

Automatically synchronized log files

Request to re-upload missed log files

Log check

Should be check whether the log file counts are same with FMS and Actix Generate KPI Report

If KPI report is not properly generated such as not visible KPI result and etc, request to NEO Team to fix the problems

Infirm that cleared Actix problems Log check

Report Actix problem to responsible person (Codi)

Request to fix Actix Problems


5


KPI PASS CASE work procedure


6

CLOT Analysis Work Procedure Work Procedure for KPI All pass case N o

Owne r

1

Analyze r

2 Analyze r

Job Category

Preparatio n for Report

Job Title

Description

Check KPI Result

- This stage is can be apply KPI Pass case only - If KPI fail case, go to next slide

Create X-Cap input data

- Need to create X-Cap input data through the CellRef

Tool

Output

X-Cap input file (Excel) - Excel Macro

Create Anyplan input data

- Need to create Anyplan input data through the CellRef

4

PCI Observed

- Check whether the PCIs in the cluster is detected all or not. If not must be describe why can’t detected

- AnyPlan

5

Sector Swap

- If observed sector swap, request to fix it to circle

- AnyPlan

Stationary Test

- Need to check how long time stationary test. If more than 20 min, Drive Reject.

- X-Cap - Excel Macro

- Check Result - Reject Report

Log files Re-used

- If there have log files are reused case, Drive Reject

- Actix Report

- Reject Report

3

6

Analyze r

Check Points

7

Next Step

Reference Material

Excel tool for create input data and check basic information

Anyplan Input file (CSV)

- If not observe on-air site PCIs, must be request to additional drive for that missed PCIs coverage

PCI Observed check method

Sector swap check method Stationary test che ck method

Mandatory - Compare update before submit SiteForge with items actual drive 8

9

Missing route check

Report Submit

and planned drive route. If (On-air) sites / Observed PCI) C1: Total scope (Planned sites / Actual - X-Cap - Compare Result less than 80% covered If mismatch count with Actual and observed PCI cell,- then must be include justification report - Mapinfo Reject Report planned DT route, Drive C2: Planned DTR (KML Format) C3: ActualReject. DT route If Actual DT covered is less than 80%, then must be include justification report) C4: DT Sequence and DT cycle.

Submit KPI PASS report to SiteForge

- If have no any issues that above mentioned issues, than upload KPI PASS report to SiteForge.

DT Route calculation method

- Excel Macro


7

CLOT Analysis Work Procedure KPI PASS Case work procedure Circle

FMS

Whole Re-Drive

-

ActixOne

Below 80% covered DT rout Observed Stationary test Observed Log file ReUsed

Additional Drive Additional drive is below 2 cases only Not observed PCI / If between 80% and 99% DT Covered Verification test after fix sector swap issue

Coordinator

Analyzer

SiteForge

Description

KPI Result Check

Check several points - PCI Observed - Sector swap - Stationary test - Log file Reused - Missing route check

Pass Report

andatory update items before submit SiteForge

Request to Validate : Total scope (Planned sites / Actual (On-air) sites / Observed PCI) If mismatch count with Actual and observed PCI cell, then must be include justification report : Planned DTR (KML Format) : Actual DT route Request to upload SiteForge If less then 80% of Actual DT covered, then must be include justification report) : DT Sequence and DT cycle. Upload all KPI PASS report on SiteForge

Reject report

Share with Circle team


8

Analysis DT2 KPI Pass rate

plan for Circle issue (Information mismatch with Actual and SiteForge)  Not properly implemented on the field base on optimizer recommended parameters. [ NOPT ]

[ LSMR]

[ Circle Team]

[ SOLPAR ]

Most of non-observant step is here 1 Recommendatio n

2

Region Coordi.

2

 Analyzer do not know whether the azimuth and tilt properly change or not until check related photos  Anytime can request If analyzer needed related photos that antenna azimuth and tilt

SiteForge Physical parameter change by SOLPAR according to siteforge suggestion value Change PHY Suggestion Para. On site field

1

Change request E-Tilt/NBR through Jira LSMR Engineer

Provide changed E-Tilt/NBR value through Jira

Input Actual value into siteforge Inform Changed value to NOPT Region Coordi (Fill in value at recommend sheet feedback & Remark column)

013 © Samsung Electronics

RF Lead

Feedback updated value

CLOT Analysis Work Procedure Decisions for next step (KPI PASS Case)

Check points

Case of detail points


Conclusion

10


KPI FAIL CASE work procedure


11

CLOT Analysis Work Procedure Work Procedure for KPI Fail case N o

1

2

3

4

5

Owner

Job Category

Job Title

Analyze r/ LSM Enginee r

Information Acquisition

Request LSM Information

Analyze r

Check antenna parameter

Compare with suggested physical antenna parameter and RET Status

Analyze r

Analyze r

Analyze r

Compare DT Route

Check points

Analysis

Missing Route Check

Description

Tool

Output

Next Step

Reference Material

Alarm History Neighbor List Ping Test Result UL Interference VSWR RET Status PKG Information Golden Parameter - GTP Loss -

- Should be check whether the physical antenna parameters are applied on the field or not

- Compare with actual drive and planned drive route. If less than 80% covered planned DT route, Drive Reject.

- LSM Info

- Compare Result

- MapInfo - X-Cap

- Compare Result - Reject Report

DT Route calculation M ethods

Stationary test check Methods

Stationary test

- Need to check how long time stationary test. If more than 20 min, Drive Reject.

- X-Cap - Excel Macro

- Check Result - Reject Report

Log file Re-Used

- If there have log files are reused case, Drive Reject

- Actix Report

- Reject Report

- In case of included L1 fail, perform to Anyplan analysis KPI Fail analysis - In case of without L1 fail, © Samsung Electronics. Rights perform to X-Cap All analysis

- In case of not properly applied Physical antenna parameters on the field, drive reject

AnyPlan X-Cap Mapinfo Global Mapper - Excel Macro Reserved. - LSM Info -

- Analysis Result - Recommendatio n Confidential and

L1 Analysis Methods L2 Analysis Methods L3 Analysis Methods

12

CLOT Analysis Work Procedure KPI FAIL Case work procedure Circle

FMS

ActixOne

Coordinator

Analyzer

KPI Result Check

Request LSM Information Below 80% covered DT rout - Observed Stationary test Re-Drive - Whole Observed Log file ReUsed

LSM -

Description

Alarm History Neighbor List Ping Test Result UL Interference VSWR RET Status PKG Information Golden Parameter GTP Loss

-

Check several points - PCI Observed - Sector swap - Stationary test - Log file Reused - Site Alarms - Missing route check

Additional Drive Additional drive is below 2 cases only Not observed PCI / If between 80% and 99% DT Covered Verification test after fix sector swap issue

Below than 80% Check DT Route

Between 80% and 99% Check whether the X-Cap Analysis any reason of impact to KPI results are there or not Anyplan Analysis - Sector Swap - Used wrong FTP server - Missing drive for KPI Analysis Report major road

Request to Validate

Share with Circle team Reject report


13

CLOT Analysis Work Procedure Decisions for next step (KPI Fail Case)

Check points

Case of detail points


Conclusion

14


Analysis work procedure for each Layer


15

CLOT Analysis Work Procedure L1 FAIL Analysis work procedure RF Design

SiteForg e

Coordinat or

Analyzer

LSM

Should be considering about SITEFORGE EMF Report That included surrounding photos.

Gathering the information

LSM Information - RET Information - Alarm history - UL RSSI - VSWR

Preparation for Analysis data

Refer to Tackle RSRP KPI Fail-Antenna parameter check process as next slide 25

Detail process for exceptional case

Preparation for necessary report

Slide 18

If not possible to reduce BSP, need to create exceptional case report

Drive route (KML) BSP (KML) RSRP Plot (KML) PCI Plot (KML) Analyzer opinion

★ Basic checks : implemented in system that tx_atten as type3 Ant 3dB(20 -> 50), type4 is 1dB(20 -> 30)

Define RSRP Fail area

Analysis for L1 KPI Fail reason

Poor Coverage (Need Optimization)

BSP Issue Terrain Block Block by high –Rise building or heavy dense trees or ETC Neighbor Issues

Anyplan Analysis

Site Alarms UE Issue SOLPAR Issues Should be reflect above issue in analysis report

Recommendation Create Report Request to validate

NEO Team

BSP Issue raise regulation - In case of DT1, should be try to more analyze. If the case is obviously BSP problem such as in correctly selected morphology, than can be BSP issue raise. - Basically, BSP issue can be raise only beyond DT2

Recommendation regulation - Electrical tilt: should be less then 7 degree (if necessary, may apply more then 7 degree but should describe to reason why? In analysis report. - Should be considering about Google Earth map and EMF Report if available when suggest to physical antenna parameters.

Share with circle team Create exceptional case Report

Analyzer decide, if can’t achieve for L1 KPI PASS


16

CLOT Analysis Work Procedure Exceptional case detail process Circle

Analyzer

Adnan, Siksha

RJIL

CLOT fail reason analysis

Suggest physical antenna parameter Possible to improve via OPT Factor of Exceptional Unstable terrain High-Rise building block Heavy visitation location Scattered Clutters

Preparation for exceptional Report

Study

Discuss with RJIL for exceptional case


17

CLOT Analysis Work Procedure RSRP KPI fail – antenna parameter check Circle

Complete DT1 Drive test

Coordinator

Analyzer

Check KPI Result If RSRPKPI is fail and < 90%

Description

Currently a large number of clots are failing due to only RSRP KPI failing. On of the reasons for this KPI failing, is that antenna parameters on field are not matching cellref So the suggestion is that, every time for a clot, RSRP KPI is fail-antenna parameter recommendations should be verified as left process

Plot RSRP KPI on Map

Check areas of very poor RSRP

Need to take photos of antenna and provide to optimization engineer

If the very poor RSRP area are suspected that particular sites antenna status is not properly implement on the field such as wrong azimuth, and tilt setting

Request to verify antenna parameters to circle team

Only once antenna parameter values are match with CellRef then proceed normal analysis process

Fallow normal analysis process


18

CLOT Analysis Work Procedure L2 FAIL Analysis work procedure Coordinator

Analyzer

LSM

Refer to L1 analysis process

NEO Team

Check KPI Fail items

Define low throughput area

X-CAP Analysis

RF Issue

Other Issue

Overshooting Poor Coverage Shadow area

FTP Issue Backhaul Issues High UL Interference (RSSI) PCI Collusion Handover Issues UE Issues Site Alarms SOLPAR Issues

Create KPI Analysis Report

Request to Validate

Share with circle team


19

CLOT Analysis Work Procedure L3 FAIL Analysis work procedure Coordinator

Analyzer

Refer to L1 analysis process

NEO

SI Team

Check KPI Fail items

Define L3 Fail Location

X-CAP Analysis For all of third party issue cases are must be inform to SI team to analysis with SI Tracker

SI Issue RF Issue

Other Issue

Overshooting Poor Coverage Shadow area

UE Configuration Error High UL Interference High GTP Loss 64QAM OCNS Loading Site Alarm SOLPAR Issues

Create KPI Analysis Report

Request to Validate Share with circle team


20


Appendix


21

CLOT Analysis Work Procedure Any case of antenna optimization

Need to check other band cluster status

Not start CLOT Optimization

Physical antenna parameter Recommendation

KPI All passed

In-Progress CLOT Optimization

Should be same physical antenna parameters with configuration of other band settings


22


23

Analysis Work Procedure_V1.0.2

Recommend Documents