Doctrine of Separate Legal PersonalityFull description
case digestFull description
LBP vs Listana DigestFull description
Gonzales vs LandbankFull description
Case DigestFull description
lossFull description
Full description
xDescripción completa
Full description
Full description
cv
Preset List v-Ampire v-Amp v-Amp Pro
.Full description
protocolo de ejecución, para los subtest: Búsqueda de símbolos y Claves de WISC VDescripción completa
fajas en v
Descripción: Economía
Desarrollo de los Componentes Didácticos 5.1- Los planes de clase. 5.2- Integración de las Áreas del conocimiento. 5.3- Aprovechamiento de las inteligencias múltiples. 5.4- Los cierres Pedagógi...Full description
CASE TITLE: Landbank v. Listana GR NO.: G.R. No. 152611 DATE: August 5 2!!" #ETITIONER: #ETITIONER: Landbank o$ t%& #%i'i((in&s RES#ONDENT: S&v&)ino Listana *ACTS: R&s(ond&nt Listana o+&)&d to s&'' %is 'and,2-6.!561 %a. in So)sogon to t%& gov&)n/&nt t%)oug% t%& DAR und&) t%& CARL. DAR va'u&d t%& ()o(&)t0 at #5163.!" but Listana )&$us&d to s&'' at t%at ()i4&. An ad/inist)ativ& ad/inist)ativ& ()o4&&ding und&) t%& D&(a)t/&nt o$ Ag)a)ian R&$o)/ Adudi4ation oa)d ,DARA d&t&)/in&d t%& ust 4o/(&nsation o$ t%& 'and at #1!35636" and o)d&)&d #&tition&) #&tition&) LANDAN7 to (a0 t%& sa/& to Listana. A 8)it o$ &9&4ution 8as issu&d b0 #ARAD,#)ov. Ag)a)ian R&$o)/ Aduti4ato) to 8%i4% LANDAN7 did not 4o/('0. A otion $o) Cont&/(t 8as ;'&d b0 Listana 8it% t%& #ARAD against (&tition&) LANDAN7. #ARAD g)ant&d t%& otion $o) Cont&/(t 4iting $o) indi)&4t 4ont&/(t and o)d&)ing t%& a))&st o$ ALE< A. LORA=ES t%& anag&) o$ L#. L# obtain&d a ()&'i/ina)0 inun4tion $)o/ t%& R&giona' T)ia' Cou)t o$ So)sogon to )&st)ain DARA $)o/ issuing t%& o)d&) o$ a))&st. Listana ;'&d a s(&4ia' 4ivi' a4tion $o) 4&)tio)a)i 8it% t%& Cou)t o$ A((&a's. CA nu''i;&d t%& o)d&) o$ t%& RTC. #&tition&) L# t%&n ;'&d a (&tition $o) )&vi&8 8it% t%& Su()&/& Cou)t. ISS>E: ?%&t%&) o) not t%& #ARAD@s o)d&) o$ 4ont&/(t 8as inva'id. ELD: =&s. =&s. It 8as inva'id inva'id $o) t%& $o''o8ing $o''o8ing )&asons: )&asons: a. t%& Ru'&s o$ Cou)t 4'&a)'0 )&Bui)& t%& ;'ing o$ a v&)i;&d (&tition 8it% t%& R&giona' T)ia' T)ia' Cou)t 8%i4% 8%i4% 8as not 4o/('i&d 8it% in t%is 4as&. 4as&. T%& 4%a)g& 4%a)g& 8as not initiat&d initiat&d b0 t%& #ARAD motu proprio; )at%&) proprio; )at%&) it 8as b0 a /otion ;'&d b0 )&s(ond&nt. )&s(ond&nt. b. n&it%&) t%& #ARAD no) t%& DARA %av& u)isdi4tion to d&4id& t%& 4ont&/(t 4%a)g& ;'&d b0 t%& )&s(ond&nt. T%& issuan4& o$ a 8a))ant o$ a))&st 8as b&0ond t%& (o8&) o$ t%& #ARAD and t%& DARA.
Quasi-judicial agencies that have the power to cite persons for indirect contemp t (u)suant to Ru'& 1 o$ t%& Ru'&s o$ Cou)t can only do so by initiating them in the proper Regional Trial Court. It is not 8it%in t%&i) u)isdi4tion and 4o/(&t&n4& to d&4id& t%& indi)&4t indi)&4t 4ont&/(t 4as&s. T%&s& /att&)s a)& sti'' 8it%in t%& ()ovin4& o$ t%& R&giona' T)ia' Cou)ts. In t%& ()&s&nt 4as& t%& indi)&4t 4ont&/(t 4%a)g& 8as ;'&d not 8it% t%& R&giona' T)ia' Cou)t but 8it% t%& #ARAD and it 8as t%& #ARAD t%at 4it&d ). Lo)a0&s 8it% indi)&4t 4ont&/(t. T%us t%& o)d&) o)d&) 8as REERSED REERSED and SET SET ASIDE. #&tition #&tition g)ant&d.